Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can't understand why you did this to a new camera. If you want a used camera, make it because you're traveling and shooting a lot, not because you think it is stylish. For me it is stupid to have a fake used camera.

Wow. I'm new to this forum, but I'm on a few other hobby related ones. I'm always amazed by people's negativity. Photography is an art, and the camera is the tool. If someone chooses to personalize their tool and share it, let them. If you don't care for it, then keep your snippy little comments to yourself.

 

If you don't have anything nice to say, than don't say it all. Something we all should have learned in kindergarten.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. I'm new to this forum, but I'm on a few other hobby related ones. I'm always amazed by people's negativity. Photography is an art, and the camera is the tool. If someone chooses to personalize their tool and share it, let them. If you don't care for it, then keep your snippy little comments to yourself.

 

If you don't have anything nice to say, than don't say it all. Something we all should have learned in kindergarten.

 

 

No, Pierre pretty much nailed it.  Unless we are misunderstanding the OP, that camera is a fraud.  It does not sound like it earned its scrapes and dings through actual use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. I'm new to this forum, but I'm on a few other hobby related ones. I'm always amazed by people's negativity. Photography is an art, and the camera is the tool. If someone chooses to personalize their tool and share it, let them. If you don't care for it, then keep your snippy little comments to yourself.

If you don't have anything nice to say, than don't say it all. Something we all should have learned in kindergarten.

When you write on a forum you expose yourself especially if you destroy a camera as he did! Edited by Pierre
Link to post
Share on other sites

Writing this with a smile I thank everyone of you for their non sugar coated comments on my latest "crazy act".

Pierre comments is no surprise and understandable , my dad actually act the same way, slapping on my 40 years old head when he saw what I did.

But let me explain why I did it beside the fact that I like to do it. I'm a modeler, scale car modeler that is. Replicate the old worn out look of old cars on to 1/10 scale. When I was young I was fascinated with old cameras especially those from war photographers. So yes you're right that what I did is not real and fake but I know for sure being just a enthusiasts, my gear won't look like that even when I'm dead. So I replicated to my taste. I loved I even more now and it's a keeper.

Digital cameras comes and goes, I'm not destroying it just cosmetic enhancements, every scratch I have made is well thought and calculated.

Writing this is by no means to win Pierre or anybody over to like what I did. You don't like? Me happy ;) Meaning there won't be any other like mine.

 

Here's a picture of my other hobby beside taking pictures.

Thanks for watching and feel free free to comment.

DSCF5078_zps9zby4xlt.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kind of makes my heart race, but if you're happy with it then have at it.

 

I prefer my camera to get scratched the old fashioned way, so I try not to baby them in the field, but no matter how hard I try, they still look fantastic.  I still don't have the guts to take some sand paper or something to them though.  Still, they do look cool when they "appear" well used.

 

Clearly, it's a thing.

 

X-Pro2_BK_AkiraSakamoto-11-720x405.jpg

 

The Lenny Kravitz Edition...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kind of makes my heart race, but if you're happy with it then have at it.

 

I prefer my camera to get scratched the old fashioned way, so I try not to baby them in the field, but no matter how hard I try, they still look fantastic.  I still don't have the guts to take some sand paper or something to them though.  Still, they do look cool when they "appear" well used.

 

Clearly, it's a thing.

 

X-Pro2_BK_AkiraSakamoto-11-720x405.jpg

 

The Lenny Kravitz Edition...[/size]

That's Xpro2 is actually my inspiration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually think it looks awesome. The OP is obviously an artist. What he does with his gear should be his business. Calling the camera a 'fraud'...really? Does that mean all the pics he takes are fraudulent images? Lol. I'm loving my x70 more every day and if I had his skills I might take a crack at personalizing mine as well. Thanks for sharing that @fujiglitch.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, it's your camera. I think it looks awesome.  I also wish it came from long-term use.  But thats neither here nor there.  In today's "buy new" world, most of our gear will never look like that.  I shoot with an X-T1.  I've owned it since February 2014;  It's worn a bit, some brass is showing, i've used it literally IN saltwater, wet sand, mud, rain, sleet and snow, but it still looks new.  And trust me it is NOT attributed to any of my housekeeping attributes.  

Now, my 1978 Minolta X-E7 which I still own, that thing looks worse than your camera does -- and it still functions!!  And if you think that would like bad, the prism, where the word "Minolta" is printed, is held in place by black electrical tape with a small cutout for the light meter.  If you take the tape off, the entire meter, prism, and wires just dangle outwards.  The results of four very rough and tumble years in Alaska from Valdez to North of Fairbanks!!!

 

Anyway, to each his own.  I like the look; I prefer it were natural, but either way, it's rocks.

 

Best.

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

To each their own.  I'm with your dad, FujiGlitch, and would be giving you a slap on the head (even though I'm only a few years older than you).  ;)  I don't necessarily baby my equipment, but I do like keeping it look as new as possible.

 

To a non-Fuji owner - and someone who doesn't know what the camera really is - the beaten up looking X70 will look vintage and well used as per the intent of FujiGlitch.  So while we wouldn't be fooled, more than 99% of the public will be.  And this is a photography forum.  We take pictures that are either seen as good or not good based on a bunch of subjective factors.  Like HDR, this camera may not be to everyones taste, but what WE do isn't to everyone's taste either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I think that looks great (and very well done) !

People that think they gear is like precious and cannot bear a scratch need to think again about photography.

 

My X-T1 has some scratches, my 18/2 lens hood is in a bad shape and cannot be removed form the lens.

But being careless about the gear is what lead you to get great pictures. If you worry about the scratches, rain, dust and other problems, you may loose a shot. Maybe you're fine with it, but I'm not :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like it a lot, well done!

 

I'm a big fan of worn out items, and jlmphotos is right in saying that most of our actual electronic stuff won't get used long enough to get this kind of look from use only.

 

I bought a second hand X-E1 which doesn't look good at all when scratched though, just boring dark grey under the scratched light grey.

I would like to see a "real color" photo of your modification if you don't mind, perhaps I could go with a black camera next time if the scratches are more aesthetically pleasant!

 

On the other hand, I hate scratches on some of my electronics, like laptop, smartphone, tablet.

For this old look, I go with leather cover on my phone which takes every ding and scratches, and the mix of brand new screen surrounded by worn out leather is somehow fascinating.

 

Anyway, to each their own, and keep the photo coming!

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you scratch up the LCD screen too?? lmao.  

 

 

I unintentionally scratched the LCD on my X100T by throwing it on top of my 50-140 in my Pelican.  If I can only turn back time to correct my stupidity :(

 

That being said, it's his camera and his choice to do what he wants.  I like the look of a brassed camera....Leica buyers will pay a premium for a celebrity endorsed brassed camera....which is crazy to me!

Edited by noeltykay
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it looks cool. I mean, it's a bit like pre-distressed jeans but it's damn near impossible to put that much wear on a camera these days if you're going for that look. I have a few nicks on my X-T1 but I doubt it will ever look as "vintage" as that.

 

LOL people saying you "destroyed" it. I assume it still functions 100%...it just looks badass now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...