I'm with Hermelin. It does look like a random snapshot without any thought to composition, framing, or subject matter. If it's intended as street, I also see no decisive nor interesting moment. The stone arch looks like it would be interesting in person, as would the two tattooed characters. But a photo of interesting subjects does not necessarily make an interesting photo.
Random snapshots can be fun and have lots of personal value to the photographer. But that doesn't mean they have to mean anything to the rest of us. For me, one of the most challenging aspects of learning photography was/is learning the difference between photos that have a personal, sentimental value and photos that have value to unbiased, neutral viewers.
Harry-angel, by going after Hermelin's photos you might be getting a little too defensive. Criticism is OK, especially when people are directly asking for it (OP: "Do you think the photos are nice?" Hermelin: "No."). There was nothing rude or mean about Hermelin's response. Not everyone needs hand-holding or coddling. Just my two cents. Not trying to rant or offend, just stating my own opinion. Feel free to disagree.