Jump to content

People -- Anything about People (Open Thread)


Recommended Posts

XT1 & XF23/2

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Heart melting moment.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by czcianka
Link to post
Share on other sites

X-e1 + 35mm f2

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Angler.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love my 90 but still playing with the thought of changing to the 56 f/1.2 for the more practical focal lenght and wider aperture. The 90 has superior AF but I rarely use I think. Most shots are just candid shots of my family like this where I'm sure the AF speed of the 56 would be sufficent. Not sure how it would keep up with kids running around though

 

8dQhR6A.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love my 90 but still playing with the thought of changing to the 56 f/1.2 for the more practical focal lenght and wider aperture. The 90 has superior AF but I rarely use I think. Most shots are just candid shots of my family like this where I'm sure the AF speed of the 56 would be sufficent. Not sure how it would keep up with kids running around though

 

Filip,

otoh, when you are outside you would miss the 90. Or when you need to reach to the stage in not so good light when your kid starts playing in school plays. So I provide you a good excuse to keep the 90 and buy another lens. For inside I would say the 35 (f2?) is maybe an ever better focal length than the 56.

 

Cheers

George

Link to post
Share on other sites

Filip,

otoh, when you are outside you would miss the 90. Or when you need to reach to the stage in not so good light when your kid starts playing in school plays. So I provide you a good excuse to keep the 90 and buy another lens. For inside I would say the 35 (f2?) is maybe an ever better focal length than the 56.

 

Cheers

George

I have the 35 f/2 as well :)

Im keeping the 90.

I want to sell my 18-55 and get wide angle prime instead, 18 or 16.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the beach 

Pro X2 / 16   1.4f WR

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ole Hippie...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

X-E2 + 16-55

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

XT1 & XF35/1.4

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Caballeros Cubanos de Holguin

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Fidel's grave at the St. Ifigenia cemetery in Santiago 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Santiago de Cuba Plaza de la revolucion Antonio Maceo monument

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Melilla, Holguin, Cuba. State Shop and employee.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Santiago de Cuba

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...