Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Foam Museum, Amsterdam

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amsterdam

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amsterdam

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amsterdam

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

II wouldn't say that. I'd say the title is very unfortunate, not because I am shocked but because I firmly believe a phtograph's interpretation should be up to the viewer, it's not the role of the photographer to tell people how they should interpret it. Something like Street Name - Year would be much better imo. I don't like titles that are oriented because they seem to imply the viewer is not intelligent enough to make a link on his own about what's happening, so he needs the help of the pohotgrapher to explain him what it's about.

 

 

Interesting point. I, sometimes, keep thinking about a title to put on my shots, because I feel weird about leaving the camera file name.  Never thought of just putting the location and letting the view figure out whatever they want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you citral. Bilbao, Spain.

Where they built the Guggenheim museum

 

attachicon.gif2013.06.07_unbenannt_166-Bearbeitet_Snapseed.jpg

 

sorry for the OT pic

 

Beautiful Shot!! Planning to go there in september! What lens did you use on this shot?

 

10mm with the 10-24, beautiful.  Just checked on your site.  I can't seem to find a way to delete the post, so I just edited with the info :-)

Edited by marcelo_valente
Link to post
Share on other sites

Khua Din Market, Vientiane Laos. Fuji XT1 w/35mm

 

For more of my work:

Blog- thientravelography.blogspot.com

500px- 500px.com/thienbui

 

Thien

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heaven or hell? Modern times in Ladakh, 2014. 

 

(X-T1 & 35mm)) 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bremen Townmusicians on Tour in Oman (2015)

 

(X-T1 & 55-200mm)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Cownilingus" (in German it sounds even better: Kuhnilingus...) 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Police

 

(Carnival in Krefeld, Germany) 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nepal with the Xpro-1

 

10341449725_aa9e75fabd_h.jpgLook out over Bhaktapur by Manolo, on Flickr

Hi,

 

excellent shot and perspective! 

But please allow me a little criticism concerning the image processing: the sky is obviously darkened a little bit sloppy and as a result of this the transition between sky and the wooden beams in the foreground shows a pretty visible white edge... The same with the hills in the background: towards the houses you forgot to ad polarization or what ever you used. I think a little bit more editing of this stunning pic and will be perfect! 

 

 

Sadly this place probably doesn't exist anymore due to the earthquake.... Bhaktapur was hit pretty hard. I wish all the best to the Nepalese people!!! 

 

Cheers

Harry Angel 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14701143783_988a6c6fee_c.jpg

Hiding the wide-angle? Failed! by KwyjiboVanDeKamp Oh sorry, this isn't a Fuji cam shot. Hope you still like it.

 

14611620726_eb4bf31ab4_c.jpg

Black & white night snack by KwyjiboVanDeKamp, auf Flickr

 

16199598611_ed99c914c3_c.jpg

Tomatoes by KwyjiboVanDeKamp, auf Flickr

 

16305232318_947ea21e4e_c.jpg

Roaring by KwyjiboVanDeKamp, auf Flickr

 

15329344629_762232d8d0_c.jpg

Through the flames by KwyjiboVanDeKamp, auf Flickr

 

15302437208_786997fa51_c.jpg

Workin' by KwyjiboVanDeKamp, auf Flickr

Link to post
Share on other sites

These pictures of couples, taken with an X100T are related to my project 'The Embrace' (thread in People). My favourite is of the two old gentlemen sharing a joke.

 

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...