Jump to content

Hermelin

Members
  • Posts

    426
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by Hermelin

  1. Thanks for the review! I'm going o try the trial of ON1. I'm just wondering about what product to buy? 1. If I just purchase "ON1 Photo RAW" do I have to pay everytime there's a a new upgrade? Since "ON1 Plus Pro MEMBERSHIP" says "Free upgrades with active membership" 2. Is ON1 Effects 10.5 with all those filters included when I purchase "ON1 Photo RAW" or do I have to buy it seperatetly? Same question regarding ON1 Resize 10.5.
  2. Well since Irident only exist for Mac, ON1 is probably the best choice for us Windows users, correct?
  3. Is Irident Developer for MAC OS only and and Irident X-Transformer for Windows only? But they do basically the same thing?
  4. ISO 8000. SOOC. NR -3 I believe. Not wideangle though. Shot with the 35 f/2 @ f/2 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8046037/DSCF7411.JPG
  5. Coming from Canon I have to say that Fujifilm is really impressing me with how fast they put out new lenses and listening to what their customers really wants. So many great lenses out already and they're stll pumping new ones out. I love owning a Fujifilm body, only issue is that I want to buy more and more all the time
  6. Here's ISO 10 000 in LOW lit situation. Ofcourse it's not as detailed as ISO 6400 @ a better lit situation but I still find it impressive and terrific for aps-c. -3 in NR, no post editing. JPEG Straight out of cam. DSCF9672 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr
  7. ISO 10 000 DSCF9672 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr
  8. Not sure if it qualfies as street DSCF9473 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr DSCF9637 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr
  9. Straight out of cam. Classic Chrome DSCF9473 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr
  10. Saw this in the manual Today I shot some fencing and I was unsure if I should use zone or single point when photographing the subject coming towards me.
  11. Picture of what the body and lenses looks like now?
  12. And now I'm also thinking about the rumored 18 f/2 MK II
  13. Some of these makes no sense to me. Why a 90 f/2 II? The existing 90 f/2 is perfect and is only like 1 ½ years old. What would you want in a MK II version?
  14. So you're basically screwed if you only shot JPEG?
  15. Post your shots of people taken with the xf 16 f/1.4
  16. If IBIS makes the camera bigger I have no interest in it.
  17. I honestly wouldn't want one because of size and cost. 35 f/2 is fine is a terrific lens, enough DOF for me at that focal lenght (and if it isn't there's always the 1.4). If I really want thin DOF I grab my 90 f/2, yes sure 90mm is too long a lof of times, but for outdoor portrait it's terrific.
  18. I think I'll go with the 16 f/1.4. Ill just wait for next black Friday or something
  19. Too much $ to justify both for a simple hobby photographer like me I'm actually thinking of selling the 18-55 so I can purchase either 16 or 10-24 with a good conscience
  20. It says "You do not have permission to view this image" when I try to view the images
  21. Some pics from Sthlm today DSCF8424 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr DSCF8425 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr DSCF8450 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr DSCF8479 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr DSCF8484 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr
  22. Which combo would you go for if you could only have only only have 1 of these 2 combos and why?
  23. Good! Then I'm still at the dilemma between chosing between just the 16 and 10-24
×
×
  • Create New...