matteo

FUJI XF100-400 vs SEL70200 As I told already...there's a diff. in AWB because there were some clouds an hour later...don't let you cheat by the "darker" Sony image... Fuji left Sony right 100mm F4.5 Center 200mm F5.0 center 200mm F5.0 left corner 400mm F5.6 center Conclusion: I was quite impressed of the Fujis corner sharpness: I mean it's a APS-C lens...Sony is FF. Also wide open is not a problem for Fuji. In both tests so far, the vantage was on Sonys side (fixed lens vs zoom / 2.9x Zoom vs 4x Zoom) So should be an easy "win" for Sony. The SEL70-200 was beside my SEL50F18 one of the sharpest lens...now I sold it

Ohh, now OK?

Fuji XF18-55 vs Sony SEL35F18 Fuji left / Sony right CENTER LEFT CORNER My Conclusion: Center-sharpness is almoust the same when you add a bit more contrast to the Sony pics Corner-sharpness is almoust the same...(in my eyes Fuji looks a tick sharper) The winner for me is the Fuji XF18-55: sharpness on the same level (zoom vs fixed lens!!!) Sony has very slow and loud AF next review comming soon...

Hey there, Before I switched to the Fuji System (X-T2) I was using Sony E-Mount (A6000) with many lenses. My Idea was to use the X-T2 for "bigger" lenses and the A6000 for smaller primes and the 10-18. So I made a short (non scientific) comparison of some lenses... Test conditions inside: levelled Tripod both OIS off 10sec self-timer 6 shots p. Aperture 3x AF/ 3x MF (best result of them...so mainly MF)* Base ISO100 Distance +/- 2m-3m RAW files imported in LR (100% NO EBV) AWB (Sony is a bit darker because of the clouds coming up an hour later) *Sony MF pics were much better than AF. Fuji AF/MF pics were looking almoust the same So let's start:

have you seen already seen this? 35F2 VS 35F1.4 I would go for the WR 35F2.