Hermelin

Do you guys think it will be smaller or bigger or about the same size as the 10-24?

I printed this out on a 70cm x 50cm canvas (27 x 20 inches I think?). Looks terrific. Best part of all, I didn't do any editing what so ever on the digital file. Straight out of cam. Canvas is expensive though!

One of the most important criterias when it comes to a camera for me -Ergonomics.

I guess, but 4 lenses and 2 of them being expensive (The 90 and the 10-24) is bad on my conscience

Well I finally got what I wanted 18-55, 35 f/2 and 90 f/2. But now I'm thinking of selling the 18-55 and get the 10-24 instead since I enjoy using the 35 f/2 so much as a everyday lens (instead of the 18-55).

Across straight out of cam with the 18-55 DSCF7907 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

Which one you rather use if you also wanna be able to do some occasional candid shot of family? I already have the 35 and 90 for this and I know it's not why you get a wideangle but it's still doable. 16 f/1.4 blows out the background better than 24 @ f/4 but 24 is a better focal lenght for shots of people.

I'm kinda on the fence on this one as well. Everyone rave about the 16 f/1.4 sharpness but looking at lenstip resolutions graphs comparing the 2 the 10-24 seems equally sharp @ f/4 and 5.6 in the centre. Here's the 16. "On further stopping down the resolution improves and its peak can be noticed by f/4.0, where you see almost 70 lpmm" And here's the 10-24 "By f/4.0 and f/5.6 (so near the maximum relative aperture) you get 69-70 lpmm so a level worth of a good quality fixed-focal lens. For a difficult construction such as a zoom lens it is a really excellent achievement"

Sounds like a smart move by Fuji.

DSCF7401 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr DSCF7411 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

DSCF7411 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

Wife and second born with the 90 f/2 indoors @ ISO 5000 DSCF7356 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

DSCF7137 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

Snow is back again DSCF6994 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

DSCF5409 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

Did some editing (not the exact same pic but same series and light). DSCF6076 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

First pics of the new year. My 4 year old on his bike ISO 4000 looking great. DSCF6511 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr ISO 8000 still looking solid! DSCF6546 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

ISO 6400 shot in JPEG straight out cam (no noise reduction). NR set to -3. Looks great to my eyes. What more do you want? This is terrific results DSCF6204 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

DSCF6084 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

That 90 f/2 ain't no joke. Just some snapshots of my wife's cousin. Straight out of cam, no editing what so ever. DSCF5967 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr DSCF5952 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

Still contemplating on the 16 f/1.4 or more reasonable but less fun choice samyang 12 f/2

All 4 with the 18-55. Straight out of cam shot in JPEG. No editing DSCF4991 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr Shot at 55m @ the slow shutterspeed 1/13 thanks to the wonderful IS DSCF5380 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr 2016_1126_15142800 (1) by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr DSCF4221 by Filip Hermelin, on Flickr

I'm very close to consider this lens, but I just got the X-T2 with the 18-55 and 90 f/2 so I feel like i need to relax and shot more for a while before buying more stuff with a good conscious

I was thinking of this one Expert Shield *Lifetime Guarantee* - The Anti Glare Screen Protector for : FujiFilm X-T2 There is also a crystal clear version. Which one is suitable for what situation?

According to this review the X-T2 seems to hold up great and in some aspect even better than the D500 IQ wise https://youtu.be/iYf7t9lzslQ