Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well, I finally snagged a silver one in VG condish, for $170 on Ebay. It's silver, not black like I wanted, and missing the front lens cap, but I'll finall get to see what all the fuss is about.

Enjoy! And like johant said, there are very cheap generic 39mm caps on eBay!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's more of a case of "what are you able do with it", vs. is the 27mm any good.

 

The '27' is easy to master and does not disappoint.
I wont say how "good" it is, or speak on the build, or the lens cap or the stinking box it came in, it's just an easy lens to get to know.  Like a cheap taco, it's just satisfying to use at a good price.

 

Those quick to poke at it with a stick maybe aren't patient with other Fuji lenses either. They may also be the crowd that thinks they need a full size sensor, and then find out those often have less pixel density than an M43 Olympus Pen.

"Mastering what you have" is typically a better initial practice then hopping around from lens to lens, blaming glass on one's ability, or "inability" to hit the metaphoric side of barn with 16 MP's of gamma...

 

Great conversation just the same. At least we all shoot Fuji, right?   You guys probably hate motorcycles,

my humble apologies......

 

Some stray pot shots with an XE-1 (does anyone even shoot with those anymore?) and the crappy 27mm.

 

Horrible, complete lack of color saturation

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Nearly no contrast at all, a bit bland.... snooze...

 

 

 

 

Rotten, worthless bokeh. You can't get bokeh from a 27, forget it.  It's crap. Good luck!

 

 

 

The pics without any feeling at all, flat, boring, very run of the mill "snaps" at best.

 

 

 

Very prone to blowing out the whites, (whoops!) worthless!

 

 

 

 

It's not capable of finding focus with both hands and a flashlight. 
Especially running around with no flash at an indoor event. Forget it. Just stay home. Buy a Canon!

 

 

 

As a 'beater" lens, it's ok, but no better than an iPhone 4. 
Maybe good enough so you remember where some of the big parts go... but that's it. Not a good lens for anything "expressive",

everything pretty flat, bla-meh....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's more of a case of "what are you able do with it", vs. is the 27mm any good.

 

The '27' is easy to master and does not disappoint.

I wont say how "good" it is, or speak on the build, or the lens cap or the stinking box it came in, it's just an easy lens to get to know. Like a cheap taco, it's just satisfying to use at a good price.

 

Those quick to poke at it with a stick maybe aren't patient with other Fuji lenses either. They may also be the crowd that thinks they need a full size sensor, and then find out those often have less pixel density than an M43 Olympus Pen.

"Mastering what you have" is typically a better initial practice then hopping around from lens to lens, blaming glass on one's ability, or "inability" to hit the metaphoric side of barn with 16 MP's of gamma...

 

Great conversation just the same. At least we all shoot Fuji, right? You guys probably hate motorcycles,

 

my humble apologies......

 

Some stray pot shots with an XE-1 (does anyone even shoot with those anymore?) and the crappy 27mm.

 

Horrible, complete lack of color saturation

 

900 BMW HDR.jpg

 

 

Nearly no contrast at all, a bit bland.... snooze...

 

load me2.jpg

 

 

 

Rotten, worthless bokeh. You can't get bokeh from a 27, forget it. It's crap. Good luck!

 

test_003.jpg

 

 

The pics without any feeling at all, flat, boring, very run of the mill "snaps" at best.

 

dry-nasty.jpg

 

 

Very prone to blowing out the whites, (whoops!) worthless!

 

fz_mike.jpg

 

 

 

It's not capable of finding focus with both hands and a flashlight.

Especially running around with no flash at an indoor event. Forget it. Just stay home. Buy a Canon!

 

800c.jpg

 

 

As a 'beater" lens, it's ok, but no better than an iPhone 4.

Maybe good enough so you remember where some of the big parts go... but that's it. Not a good lens for anything "expressive",

 

everything pretty flat, bla-meh....

 

versed_frame1100.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you the person who writes rhe blog "photos the X Pro-1 Can't take"? I love that blog and your satirical photo commentary is similar in style. If not no worries, but I agree with you about mastering the lenses you have. In this case, I bought the 27 not for the FL, but to turn my XE-1 into a more totable "XE100" to see if I take it with me more than my 18-55. So far, it seems like I do

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I just got the XF 27mm F2.8 lens last week. On my X-E1 I must say, it's absolutely impressive. I find the focal length to be perfect for so many things, general walk-around, people, street, and more. I find mine to be stunningly sharp, just amazing. Autofocus is very quick. It's tiny and lightweight. Bokeh is pleasing. Rendering is nice, perhaps not "magical" like some faster primes but has nice dimensionality, excellent color and contrast. For the moment, it's my favorite prime, all things considered. 

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted this in another thread but I think its more appropriate here, has anyone had any issues with the 27mm lens hunting to focus? Mine seems to hunt quite a bit before it focus's even on a landscape shot. The image quality is great and the lightness and portability are great for hiking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted this in another thread but I think its more appropriate here, has anyone had any issues with the 27mm lens hunting to focus? Mine seems to hunt quite a bit before it focus's even on a landscape shot. The image quality is great and the lightness and portability are great for hiking.

 

Do you have the latest firmware for camera and lens? Mine hunts some in low light but is super fast in good light on my X-E1, anything newer should work even better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

it is not a great lens, optically, like some of the other fuji offerings. You trade off the "specialness", optically, for the form factor. 

 

But neither is it a "dog" lens, either. I got some good images with it, and liked the form factor. Ultimately, though, I sold it. My personal preference is to only put on lenses that have special properties to them. And when you have those, there is little reason to reach for much else. This lens has a HUGE convenience factor, and that's meaningful, but optically it had the weakest argument for that single slot on the body of the camera--which is pretty valuable creative real estate. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it a sharp and versatile lens

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean the breakfast lounge for gold members? Not my favourite one by far, to be honest. If you mean another lounge, then I haven't been there yet.

The evening lounge, with the fireplace and the all night buffet with scallops, oysters, lobster, etc... And all the good booze you can drink. Must be a different lounge then

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I got one used to add to my "collection" and I really like what I get from it at such a compact size!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...