Jump to content

18-55 or sell and get the 18-135?


Mike B

Recommended Posts

Whoever said that the 18-135 is soft or inferior to the 18-55 is an idiot, please don't listen to what photocrappers over the net have to say, just go to flickr and see what this lens can do, here is some of my 18-135 creations out of the camera jpgs....

 

https://www.flickr.com/gp/basharar/17w404

 

First of all, I love my 18-135 lens, that one stays on my X-T1 the most often but even I admit that the 18-55 is sharper, it's not a mountain high difference in sharpness, but it is sharper, just like the 18-55 is sharper than the 18mm prime @F2.8.

 

Fuji vs Fuji has some nice comparison between these lenses.

 

Does that make the 18-135 a bad performer ? Hardly at all, it is still a great lens that is super versatile and will be able to almost always get you an image of whatever you point it at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have been looking for an alternative to my Nikon D800 + lens gear due to weight and obtrusiveness when travelling. I have debated between the 18-55/55-200 combo and the 18-135 (plus a fast prime like the 35 mm for night time and interiors). I usually use my 24-120 f/4 on my full frame camera as my walk around lens and did a sort of focal lengths used in my photos in Lightroom 5. Aside from nature shots (where I might need 400 mm), I discovered that I would frequently be changing lenses if I used the 18-55/55-200 combo. I decided that the 18-135 would work as a one lens solution for daytime, then I can use the 35 mm lens in the evening which is fast and less obtrusive. For a cropped sensor, my ideal one travel lens would be ~18 to 85 mm and faster than the 18-135 mm lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I have both, the 18-55 is mainly for night photography, and taking wave shots in Hawai'i because I picked up a Hoya 58mm ProND1000 Filter, 10 Stops (3.0) to get the effects that I want on the waves and water.  I use the 18-135 quite a bit, both in normal and very low light, here are a couple of 18-135 hand held examples shot this last Sunday at our church gathering at Canvas Church in Kalispell, MT.  Then yesterday while I was in Starbucks, I used the 18-55 which did not attract any attention from anyone while I was using it.  And then at the Holiday Inn Express last night, while my wife was shopping at a local store.

 

So while heading over to Hawai'i this Saturday, I will be shooting some indoor shots at the different airports, and different static shots looking at sharpness and over all image quality.  So far, I am very impressed with the X-T1 and either of these two lenses.
 

18-135

Crystal said, this is my bad side Jon
25277704951_bfd3532442_c.jpgCrystal Lynn by Jon Erdmann, on Flickr

 

The stage is 50 feet from where I am shooting from

24741028684_64892ddee5_c.jpgCelebratiion by Jon Erdmann, on Flickr

 

18-55

At the counter in Starbucks

25377144752_032c1c4c90_c.jpgStarbucks by Jon Erdmann, on Flickr

 

Holiday Inn Express

25128148119_b897564a4a_c.jpgHoliday Inn Express by Jon Erdmann, on Flickr

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have both the 18~55 and the 18~135. Got the latter for a trip to Hawaii (4 islands). Didn't rain on us even on the rainy side of Hilo. So, didn't test the weather resistance with my X-T1. It is bigger than the 18~55; but after I got home, I left it on the camera for several months and carried it on many hiking trips in the Superstition Mountain area of AZ. (Good for dust protection also).

 

Just now put the 18~55 back on the X-T1. Don't have any distinct opinion about one being sharper than the other. Guess I should set up a tripod and do comparison shots. But, I've been satisfied with images from both lenses. Full size image is here: http://www.lonetreeimages.com/Imgs/Hawaii_5132.jpg

 

I too own both, this about sums it up.  I keep the 18-55 in the bag with the 10-24 and 55-200.  When seriously out to shoot the wide range of focal lengths with extension tubes can shoot anything from Macro to telephoto - whatever catches my eye.  

 

The 18-135 I keep in a holster bag I carry with me most anywhere I go - I love the versatility and can keep one lens on the camera ready to go at any time.  I do find slight differences in bokeh, but IQ is very good on both.  I enjoy having both lenses available for different purposes.

Edited by Lumens
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I also bought the X-T1 with the 18-55 and loved the compact size. (Hey! It was my first lens in the switch from Nikon so it WAS small at the time! Ha! Ha!) I took it and the 55-200 to Hawaii and found that I hardly used the 55-200. I have since bought the 18-135 for use as the travel lens and use my 18-55 for walking around. The 55-200 I use for Motocross races.

 

Norseman's comments are bang on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I am out photographing an event in the daytime with one body and one lens, it would be the 18-135

 

The 16-55 or the 18-55 kit lens are both just not quite enough reach for me as a single lens option.

 

I'd love to see a 16-80 f4 OIS WR Fuji lens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • It is really easy to find out if the wifi is on. Your computer or tablet or cell phone will have a network settings dealing with wifi, bluetooth, ethernet or “other”. Open that up and go into the section for wifi, and take note of which networks are listed. Turn on the camera and keep watching the list of networks. If your camera’s wifi is turned on, a new network should suddenly show up in your computer/tablet/phone’s network listings. Now go into the camera’s menus and start a wireless connection (the x-app or camera remote app can help you with this). You should see a network show up now. It is not hidden because it has to be visible so that your computer/tablet/phone can join the camera’s network to transfer images. Turn the camera off and that network should disappear. Turn the camera back on and see what happens.
    • Sweet Creek Falls, Oregon. X-H1, Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Acros.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I think my Fuji 150-600 F8 is a brilliant wildlife lens in terms of sharpness, portability and value but the small aperture does cause issues at the start and end of the day - even pushing the ISO as far as I dare, I can see shutter speed down to 1/25s - stabilisation isn't an issue but asking a deer to stand still for that is too much! In the same situation, an F4 would give 1/100s so the difference to the success rate would be phenomenal... and that's without the other improvements like shallower depth of field. I also find that the Fuji's subject detect AF gets pretty iffy in low light - I keep updating to the latest firmware but it doesn't seem to get any better. I was originally looking at the Nikon 500mm F4 E but good examples secondhand are still reasonably expensive but like-for-like Sigma lenses are around half the price. Reviews I have read suggest that they are as good optically, AF performance and IS-wise but you gain a few hundred grams of weight (but less than the older Nikon model). For a couple of grand, I can live with that. Does anyone have any experience mounting one on an XH2S? What about with the 1.4 teleconverter? It feels like that is pushing it anyway - hefty lens + TC + Fringer all sounds a bit...wobbly? It is on the Fringer approved list but I am wary about AF speed in particular. I had also considered looking for a used Nikon 400mm F2.8, which would be even faster (and heavier) and could couple with a TC to give 560mm F4 but again, it is that lens+TC+Fringer combination that worries me as being just too many links in the chain. Of course, what I really want is a native Fuji prime but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon - and if you look at what Nikon and Sony are doing, if Fuji do ever bring out a 500mm prime, it will probably be a small, light and cheapish F5.6, which is only 2/3 stop better than my zoom at the same focal length. Any thoughts anyone?
    • The Amazon link is an annoying feature of this forum - its automatic and is applied to every post for advertising purposes. My question was - how do you know the camera wi-fi is on and requires turning off? I would have thought this would just use up the battery for no purpose if you aren't specifically using a function that requires wi-fi.
    • I've made a point to push Angelbird memory products as they are the best performance cards you can get, The sustained write speed is important.
×
×
  • Create New...