Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Impromptu shot of Xandra, while shooting family portraits for her family.

 

X-T1, 56 1.2 APD. Just classic chrome and minor skin cleanup.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

And another.

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently it's the weekend of headshots. :lol:

 

My wife needed a headshot for her student card at teacher's college (don't ask me why they didn't take it themselves, I've never seen it done this way before). It's supposed to be pretty plain, so I just did one light.

 
20952155143_af78dec0db_c.jpgDawnHeadshot by Phil Babbey, on Flickr
 
And here's a candid one.
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

 

attachted two portraits both taken with X-T1 and the XF 90mm. The first picture (shot at f2 at 1/750 sec.) is available light only ("golden hour sunset"), the second picture (shot at f8 at 1/180 sec.) was lit with a strobe and a 50cm Beauty Dish.

From my point of view the results one can get from the XF 90mm are supreme. I also own the XF 56mm but most of the time I favor the compression the XF 90mm gets me. Though you have to take into consideration that you need significant more distance to you subject what can be an issue if you are in a tight place or if you are aiming for a more intimate look. In terms of postproduction: Both pictures are RAWs converted with Capture One and retouched (picture1 only color graded) in Photoshop. (SOOC Jpegs, for this kind of work? Not on my page!)

 

Cheers!

Markus

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

X-T1, 56/1.2

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sooc jpeg. No adjustments at all!

X-T1 56mm f1.2

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

X-T1 :: Fujinon 1.2R @ 1.2 :: ISO 200 :: 1/420 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fujifilm X-E1 

Fujinon 35/1.4

Fujinon 56/1.2

 

Leyla

 

21692362550_46669acd3b_b.jpg0001 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr

 

21692342510_1630cfd41d_b.jpg0002 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr

 

21259255703_3d32b93697_b.jpg0004 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr

 

21692378608_23e04f070d_b.jpg0010 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr

 

21693312189_514ca81f0c_b.jpg0012 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr

 

21693665849_d56f67e6cd_b.jpg0011 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr

 

21257411344_73144b5a6f_b.jpg0014 by Kirill Sokolov, on Flickr

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a job today shooting portraits for a local financial group. There's some staged stuff indoors that looks like stock photography :lol: but for the nicer portraits I shot them outside - it was too cramped in the building and I couldn't find a nice background. It was beautifully overcast today, so I didn't have to light them.

 

All shot with the 35mm. The outdoor stuff is I believe f/4 for the group and 2.8 for the rest.

 

21818095728_1b38b8cac7_c.jpgDSCF0042 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr

 

21979738466_d561e645d6_c.jpgDSCF0107 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr

 

21384784463_207eaa8949_c.jpgDSCF0148 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr

 

And this is what the indoor stuff was like. Not sure if this counts as portraiture or not. :lol:

 

21818082648_d0ff19713d_c.jpgDSCF0195 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr

Link to post
Share on other sites

The iPad

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...