Jump to content

Fuji Open Zoo Thread ...


Enzio

Recommended Posts

So I went to the zoo with a 35mm f/1.4 and 18-55 that didn't leave my bag. I immediatly thought : what about we humans get into small show-boxes and lose our liberty for the profit of another specy? Aren't the humans some strange animals worth documenting after all? Just a thought I tried to translate into pictures, no morals here. Disclaimer : technically imperfect pictures, OOC jpegs.

 

18317505442_b273fa88b8_b.jpgDSCF6204 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18321475725_fcf7ac0588_b.jpgDSCF6203 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

17698624054_5a045f5f8b_b.jpgDSCF6208 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18322627121_067a52e20f_b.jpgDSCF6209 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

17700420503_154088026a_b.jpgDSCF6216 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18133179308_0613763053_b.jpgDSCF6217 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18316896362_cf3e23ef14_b.jpgDSCF6221 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18294150276_12225547cf_b.jpgDSCF6233 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18134118969_a3e2c4cb42_b.jpgDSCF6247 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I went to the zoo with a 35mm f/1.4 and 18-55 that didn't leave my bag. I immediatly thought : what about we humans get into small show-boxes and lose our liberty for the profit of another specy? Aren't the humans some strange animals worth documenting after all? Just a thought I tried to translate into pictures, no morals here. Disclaimer : technically imperfect pictures, OOC jpegs.

 

18317505442_b273fa88b8_b.jpgDSCF6204 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18321475725_fcf7ac0588_b.jpgDSCF6203 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

17698624054_5a045f5f8b_b.jpgDSCF6208 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18322627121_067a52e20f_b.jpgDSCF6209 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

17700420503_154088026a_b.jpgDSCF6216 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18133179308_0613763053_b.jpgDSCF6217 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18316896362_cf3e23ef14_b.jpgDSCF6221 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18294150276_12225547cf_b.jpgDSCF6233 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

 

18134118969_a3e2c4cb42_b.jpgDSCF6247 by Christophe Branchereau, on Flickr

Hi,

 

sorry but I don't get the point. Why did you poste these pics? Looks just like snapshots from the zoo... 

I miss something special, an interesting composition or a situation with some content. 

 

Greetings 

Harry 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Please don't quote my whole long message in your message, it's really unnecessary.

 

I've refined the project as a flickr Album since then, it's here : https://www.flickr.com/photos/132271152@N08/sets/72157653375780539

 

Someone got it already, it's about an overturn of point of view. Also compositions are on purpose. You don't often see zoo pictures including fences or people zooming almost directly on the head of the animals for a good reason : zoo pictures are some kind of propaganda pretending the animals are happy and "free", or simply to present them the best possible way.

 

I present a different point of view. I won't explain everything, but the point of view turns, and at some point you see people behind fences. People actually paid to put themselves behind fences heh, funny not?

 

Overall the pictures represent how I felt that day and I tried to turn it into a story

 

(disclaimer : I hate zoos like this one, was there for a 2 yo not for me, and didn't want to get into the train of people assaulting the animals with huge zooms while their kids stomp on the windows because I'm not one who thinks it's ok to capture a polar bear and put it in France to make money with it. I have nothing against animal "parks" or "educative farms" tho where local or totally adapted animals have a lot of space to live)

 

This is counter-propaganda if you like, although I could have get really dirty and showed (or exagerated) how miserable the polar bear looked, how unhappy the lama was (I just suggested it there) or how the long haired wolf was running in circles forever in 3 square meters.

 

Now before you judge me as being negative, I'm not, I just document stuff. Here is an album of a park where animals are all very happy and live in great synergy with the humans working there and the public : https://www.flickr.com/photos/132271152@N08/sets/72157653723456006

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Please don't quote my whole long message in your message, it's really unnecessary.

 

I've refined the project as a flickr Album since then, it's here : https://www.flickr.com/photos/132271152@N08/sets/72157653375780539

 

Someone got it already, it's about an overturn of point of view. Also compositions are on purpose. You don't often see zoo pictures including fences or people zooming almost directly on the head of the animals for a good reason : zoo pictures are some kind of propaganda pretending the animals are happy and "free", or simply to present them the best possible way.

 

I present a different point of view. I won't explain everything, but the point of view turns, and at some point you see people behind fences. People actually paid to put themselves behind fences heh, funny not?

 

Overall the pictures represent how I felt that day and I tried to turn it into a story

 

(disclaimer : I hate zoos like this one, was there for a 2 yo not for me, and didn't want to get into the train of people assaulting the animals with huge zooms while their kids stomp on the windows because I'm not one who thinks it's ok to capture a polar bear and put it in France to make money with it. I have nothing against animal "parks" or "educative farms" tho where local or totally adapted animals have a lot of space to live)

 

This is counter-propaganda if you like, although I could have get really dirty and showed (or exagerated) how miserable the polar bear looked, how unhappy the lama was (I just suggested it there) or how the long haired wolf was running in circles forever in 3 square meters.

 

Now before you judge me as being negative, I'm not, I just document stuff. Here is an album of a park where animals are all very happy and live in great synergy with the humans working there and the public : https://www.flickr.com/photos/132271152@N08/sets/72157653723456006

Hi,

 

I think I got the point already at first sight. Nice idea! But still I think that the pictures are not really interesting or well done. Sorry - no trolling but that's simply how I see these pics. I think there should still be some kind of story (e.g. people acting like monkeys themselves or eating like a pig.). But here - in my eyes - it's just pictures of people outside the fence that you can find in thousands of family albums or Facebook pages... 

 

But I'm totally with you when it comes to criticize zoos. That's why I never visit them. 

And by the way: how can I not post all the pictures when I just want to reply? I didn't find the right button. 

 

Cheers

HArry 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem, I'm trying to work on photobomb, "failed" or generally falsely naive picture done on purpose, and there is a long way before I manage to make it maybe more obvious, personally I like these pictures because there is attention paid to the framing and position of people in every single one so even if it's certainly not very good it's not brainless snapshots at all.

 

Maybe you are right and I should keep that for myself tho, and begin sharing only when I'll reach a better level.

 

Cheers, and you can just edit the quote (replace the content with "..." Or something)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Our local "animal park" is not photography friendly but does seem to be animal friendly. Since there is not generally a good way to avoid the fencing in the images I tried to get some shots that at least integrated it. The guy in most of these images was our tour guide and had climbed a barrier fence to close enough to offer the residents some food.

 

Laughing Hyenas

18879687706_3f9b02bce5_n.jpg

DSCF7768 by Michael Mount, on Flickr

 

Bear

18879693556_59d94632ac_n.jpg

DSCF7779 by Michael Mount, on Flickr

 

Lemurs

18285319573_1921549d04_n.jpg

DSCF7789 by Michael Mount, on Flickr

 

Feeding a tiger costs extra

18283445454_2ffa5e42de_n.jpg

DSCF7875 by Michael Mount, on Flickr

 

A tiger waiting room

18718294920_ec7081704d_n.jpg

DSCF7840 by Michael Mount, on Flickr

 

Not as impressive as the other images on this thread, I know, but I do think they show the experience fairly well.

 

Edit: These are all taken with an X-T1 and 18-135mm

 

Thanks for looking,

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • It is really easy to find out if the wifi is on. Your computer or tablet or cell phone will have a network settings dealing with wifi, bluetooth, ethernet or “other”. Open that up and go into the section for wifi, and take note of which networks are listed. Turn on the camera and keep watching the list of networks. If your camera’s wifi is turned on, a new network should suddenly show up in your computer/tablet/phone’s network listings. Now go into the camera’s menus and start a wireless connection (the x-app or camera remote app can help you with this). You should see a network show up now. It is not hidden because it has to be visible so that your computer/tablet/phone can join the camera’s network to transfer images. Turn the camera off and that network should disappear. Turn the camera back on and see what happens.
    • Sweet Creek Falls, Oregon. X-H1, Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Acros.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I think my Fuji 150-600 F8 is a brilliant wildlife lens in terms of sharpness, portability and value but the small aperture does cause issues at the start and end of the day - even pushing the ISO as far as I dare, I can see shutter speed down to 1/25s - stabilisation isn't an issue but asking a deer to stand still for that is too much! In the same situation, an F4 would give 1/100s so the difference to the success rate would be phenomenal... and that's without the other improvements like shallower depth of field. I also find that the Fuji's subject detect AF gets pretty iffy in low light - I keep updating to the latest firmware but it doesn't seem to get any better. I was originally looking at the Nikon 500mm F4 E but good examples secondhand are still reasonably expensive but like-for-like Sigma lenses are around half the price. Reviews I have read suggest that they are as good optically, AF performance and IS-wise but you gain a few hundred grams of weight (but less than the older Nikon model). For a couple of grand, I can live with that. Does anyone have any experience mounting one on an XH2S? What about with the 1.4 teleconverter? It feels like that is pushing it anyway - hefty lens + TC + Fringer all sounds a bit...wobbly? It is on the Fringer approved list but I am wary about AF speed in particular. I had also considered looking for a used Nikon 400mm F2.8, which would be even faster (and heavier) and could couple with a TC to give 560mm F4 but again, it is that lens+TC+Fringer combination that worries me as being just too many links in the chain. Of course, what I really want is a native Fuji prime but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon - and if you look at what Nikon and Sony are doing, if Fuji do ever bring out a 500mm prime, it will probably be a small, light and cheapish F5.6, which is only 2/3 stop better than my zoom at the same focal length. Any thoughts anyone?
    • The Amazon link is an annoying feature of this forum - its automatic and is applied to every post for advertising purposes. My question was - how do you know the camera wi-fi is on and requires turning off? I would have thought this would just use up the battery for no purpose if you aren't specifically using a function that requires wi-fi.
    • I've made a point to push Angelbird memory products as they are the best performance cards you can get, The sustained write speed is important.
×
×
  • Create New...