Jump to content

X-pro2 launch, keep or sell your x-pro1?


Recommended Posts

As the release of the fuji x-pro2 is iminent (see latest post on Fuji rumours http://bit.ly/1XoRXcE) will you keep or sell your x-pro1 when the x-pro2 comes out?

 

I'm sitting on the fence regarding this. I like the xpro1 and have bought some expensive accessories also. Also i think it is kind of a classic camera of its time but of course as we all know it has its weaknesses. But who knows, the x-pro2 could be a complete flop and the xpro1 coukd become some kind of collectors item like the contax t3 that still fetches nearly $800-$1000 despite its age.

 

What would speak for keeping it or selling your x-pro1? What will you do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that wait and see is the best strategy.

 

My take on this issue (and many other things) is that the great majority of the photographers don’t even use the older camera which they have to the fullest of its possibility and they are only missing what others are telling them that they are missing but have never found the limits of their equipment but rather think that they can expand their own personal limits ( those they are finding every time they pick up any camera) by buying some “ chops in a box”.

 

Most of these folks would take the same pictures of their girlfriend or grandchildren even if you give them a X-Pro-2000.

 

 

If I have to judge from what I see published by many, very few indeed need an upgrade compared to the X-Pro-1 which they have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going to depend on what each individual likes about the XP1 IMO...

 

Those that have been asking for "guts of the XT1 in a XP1 body shape, with a OVF" (assuming any XP2 ticks that box) might see little reason to keep the old model.

 

Those that love the X-Trans 1 rendering and different NR, might find they want to hang onto their original copy (assuming that any XP2 doesn't have a X-Trans 1 sensor and identical rendering)

 

I HATE XP Leica M comparisons, so please forgive my following indulgence...

 

I think it'll be like when the M240 replaced the M9

 

Some will jump to the newer model, enjoy the improvements and never look back

Some will say that although the newer one is better, it doesn't have the charm of the original, sell the 2 and re-buy the 1

Some will own both!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Most of these folks would take the same pictures of their girlfriend or grandchildren even if you give them a X-Pro-2000.

 

I fear this is even more true of many Leica users, is it not? In which case photographing trophy wives also becomes a high priority. I would hope that Fuji users have at least a touch more intelligence and creativity.

 

I for one can at least say I feel I am often pushing my X-Pro1 to its limits. I have had reasonable sized prints made to exhibit at an art gallery, and just wish it had a few more MP of resolution to optimise things here. I often overload the data flow bottle neck and find myself waiting for it to finish writing before I can review shots. I often need to work just a tiny bit faster in studio than it will allow (and I don't think I shoot that fast compared to many spray-and-pray types these days who take thousands of shots). I do occasionally miss shots because of the shutter lag. Getting fully functional focus peaking would also be nice.

 

Yet for all that, I hold my X-Pro1 in great regard. I like to shoot with primes and having two bodies with different primes on them will be good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go to any camera group on Flickr (or whatever) and you'll find plenty of mediocre shots, or cliche shots.

 

Any camera can take a great picture. Any camera can make a shot with soul, or emotional impact or beauty or whatever.

 

The cameras that people chose to own are dependent on their budgets, not their photographical ability.

 

You don't need to pass a test to be allowed to buy a Leica or a Hasselblad or whatever, and nor should you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Precisely, so for the majority of the people who take those shots improving the camera will make no sense at all.

 

With a little bit of self criticism one can look at the picture that one takes and ask himself: “ Do I really need a new X-Pro? Or could I take these pictures with the camera that I already have? "

Link to post
Share on other sites

Precisely, so for the majority of the people who take those shots improving the camera will make no sense at all.

 

With a little bit of self criticism one can look at the picture that one takes and ask himself: “ Do I really need a new X-Pro? Or could I take these pictures with the camera that I already have? "

You're not wrong.

 

Speaking PERSONALLY I have a XT1 and a XP1. I usually use the Pro, because I like it. Even though it's an older camera and a lot slower

 

But speaking GENERICALLY people should buy what ever makes them happy....

 

....it's not really about the camera, but if someone has a emotive connection to their tool, they'll always strive to try harder with it, even if that connection is merely 'I've got the latest Fuji'

 

At the end of th day... The first X ILC was a APSC camera, the XP2 will be a APSC camera, the lenses available when the XP2 hits the stores are the same lenses available now (give or take the 35 mk2) so in terms of IQ I can't see there ultimately being a lot of difference between the XP2 and say the XT10 or XT1 etc,

 

so I guess no one should buy it and Fuji should not have even bothered to make it! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this thread is a about keep the older camera or sell it. I say keep it.

 

Consumerism is based on buying things that you don’t always need and that are mostly only things that you want. For some a new and better camera is a new tool with a chance to improve the image output, but for the majority it is only a way to own something new.

 

Companies update cameras to attract new and old customers that’s what they do. Customers have the choice and that’s what the thread is about, keep it or sell it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Money for the X-Pro2 is in the bank, should I choose to spend it. Highly satisfied with my X-Pro1 and would be willing to continue with it indefinitely. However, it is nice to be able to shoot with two similar cameras instead of switching lenses, and would be tempted to shoot with both. A Fuji honcho said in an interview that the X-Pro2 would not ship until they could include a significant technological breakthrough. Once I see the whole package, then I will decide whether I will add it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It's way too early to tell until the X-Pro2 is officially announced and tested. Typically I think most of us purchase a new camera and test it as a backup or non important work till we're confident that it'll be our primary camera. Most likely I'll sell one of my bodies and keep the other as backup, walk about camera. For me the X-Pro1 feels just right in my hand and I still love the output from the sensor. Since purchasing the X-Pro1 I've tried and sold both an X100 and X-T1 while keeping a backup X-Pro1 body and recently adding an XT-10 when I need a smaller option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope to score a brand new PRO 1 dirt cheap between now and spring next year. After that I will read up on reviews on the PRO 2 to see if improvements warrant buying that.

 

We novice photographers don't expect our images to improve because we buy a new camera, but we also appreciate such things as a faster focus, great dynamic range. longer battery life and so on. We aren't a snobbish lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • It is really easy to find out if the wifi is on. Your computer or tablet or cell phone will have a network settings dealing with wifi, bluetooth, ethernet or “other”. Open that up and go into the section for wifi, and take note of which networks are listed. Turn on the camera and keep watching the list of networks. If your camera’s wifi is turned on, a new network should suddenly show up in your computer/tablet/phone’s network listings. Now go into the camera’s menus and start a wireless connection (the x-app or camera remote app can help you with this). You should see a network show up now. It is not hidden because it has to be visible so that your computer/tablet/phone can join the camera’s network to transfer images. Turn the camera off and that network should disappear. Turn the camera back on and see what happens.
    • Sweet Creek Falls, Oregon. X-H1, Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Acros.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I think my Fuji 150-600 F8 is a brilliant wildlife lens in terms of sharpness, portability and value but the small aperture does cause issues at the start and end of the day - even pushing the ISO as far as I dare, I can see shutter speed down to 1/25s - stabilisation isn't an issue but asking a deer to stand still for that is too much! In the same situation, an F4 would give 1/100s so the difference to the success rate would be phenomenal... and that's without the other improvements like shallower depth of field. I also find that the Fuji's subject detect AF gets pretty iffy in low light - I keep updating to the latest firmware but it doesn't seem to get any better. I was originally looking at the Nikon 500mm F4 E but good examples secondhand are still reasonably expensive but like-for-like Sigma lenses are around half the price. Reviews I have read suggest that they are as good optically, AF performance and IS-wise but you gain a few hundred grams of weight (but less than the older Nikon model). For a couple of grand, I can live with that. Does anyone have any experience mounting one on an XH2S? What about with the 1.4 teleconverter? It feels like that is pushing it anyway - hefty lens + TC + Fringer all sounds a bit...wobbly? It is on the Fringer approved list but I am wary about AF speed in particular. I had also considered looking for a used Nikon 400mm F2.8, which would be even faster (and heavier) and could couple with a TC to give 560mm F4 but again, it is that lens+TC+Fringer combination that worries me as being just too many links in the chain. Of course, what I really want is a native Fuji prime but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon - and if you look at what Nikon and Sony are doing, if Fuji do ever bring out a 500mm prime, it will probably be a small, light and cheapish F5.6, which is only 2/3 stop better than my zoom at the same focal length. Any thoughts anyone?
    • The Amazon link is an annoying feature of this forum - its automatic and is applied to every post for advertising purposes. My question was - how do you know the camera wi-fi is on and requires turning off? I would have thought this would just use up the battery for no purpose if you aren't specifically using a function that requires wi-fi.
    • I've made a point to push Angelbird memory products as they are the best performance cards you can get, The sustained write speed is important.
×
×
  • Create New...