Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Link to post
Share on other sites

My comments in the controversial street photography about humour, is shown by the same image of the nun and priest. To one, it is controversial and to another, it's humorous or just simply a gesture of welcome and friendship.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This one always makes me laugh - just picturing the frustration and desperation of trying to dispose of this chair to leave it like this.

 

"Soho Trash"

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
It seems to me that Street Photography is moving slowly but surely towards being a collection of joke shots. Lucky captures of peculiar happenings seem to win the awards. But street photography in it's true pure form came about as a way to document everyday life on the street. As Bruce Gilden puts it, it's a street photograph if you can 'smell the street'. With a lot of the photos I'm seeing, labelled as street photography, this is clearly not the case. They are good pictures of odd happenings, but I'm concerned that this style of photography is heading towards and being rewarded for producing gimmicks.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Sophie :)

 

This is just one forum of many, covering just one, tiny aspect of the truly vast subject of street photography.

 

Have you looked at the other forums here, such as architecture, people at windows, kids & teenagers, street markets, loneliness / solitude, and shop windows?

 

Even with those other categories you are seeing just a tiny selection of street photography. 

 

Forums, by their nature, tend to "categorise" different subjects, and it's very easy to judge an overall subject by seeing just one, tiny part of it.

 

The "gimmicks" you refer to are real occurrences, they were not posed.

 

If you look at any of the books of photographs by Robert Doisneau, Elliott Erwitt, Gianni Berengo-Gardin, and many, many others, you will see that they were photographing those "gimmicks" 50 or 60 years ago, and those gentlemen were the pioneers of street photography.  Doisneau and Erwitt, in particular, show amazing senses of humour and irony in the work they produced from the 1950s onwards.

 

Street photography is not "heading" anywhere... it's still doing exactly what it did since Henri Cartier-Bresson started back in the 1930s, almost one hundred years ago, as you will easily see if you visit any exhibition of street photographs taken in any of the last 8 decades :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It seems to me that Street Photography is moving slowly but surely towards being a collection of joke shots. Lucky captures of peculiar happenings seem to win the awards. But street photography in it's true pure form came about as a way to document everyday life on the street. As Bruce Gilden puts it, it's a street photograph if you can 'smell the street'. With a lot of the photos I'm seeing, labelled as street photography, this is clearly not the case. They are good pictures of odd happenings, but I'm concerned that this style of photography is heading towards and being rewarded for producing gimmicks.

 

I think you should lighten up a bit.  Loosen the camera strap from around your neck and breath.  I actually enjoyed these humorous images though I DESPISE street photography and the entire gender it encompasses.  Even a jerk like me can like something.   :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Headless Wave in Istanbul

<a data-flickr-embed="true"  href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/fdwalker/21146165573/in/dateposted/" title="Headless Hand | Istanbul, Turkey"><img src="https://farm1.staticflickr.com/625/21146165573_a692826dc0_b.jpg" width="1024" height="681" alt="Headless Hand | Istanbul, Turkey"></a><script async src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

A little sea breeze on the ferry in Istanbul

<a data-flickr-embed="true"  href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/fdwalker/23887355706/in/photostream/" title="Istanbul, Turkey 2015"><img src="https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5668/23887355706_b4b54f6d2b_b.jpg" width="1024" height="678" alt="Istanbul, Turkey 2015"></a><script async src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

Sun tanning in Cinarcik, Turkey

<a data-flickr-embed="true"  href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/fdwalker/23736758770/in/dateposted/" title="Cinarcik, Turkey 2015"><img src="https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5718/23736758770_5a721396cb_b.jpg" width="1024" height="678" alt="Cinarcik, Turkey 2015"></a><script async src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

Follow it all at ShooterFiles.com !

http://shooterfiles.com/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • Anyone out there have any experience/feedback on the Laowa 55 mm tilt shift? I’d be using it on the GFX 50s ii. 
    • Hi, I'm researching a gimbal to get someone as a present & they use a Fuji XS-10. I did a quick search of previous threads on gimbals but all of them seem to either get no replies or spammed by a link to an Amazon list. I'd appreciate any comments from folks who've actually used specific gimbals with the XS-10. I'm aware that some, such as certain models from Zhiyun, DJI & FeiyuTech either don't say that they are fully compatible with the XS-10 but other sites say they do work ok but some functions don't. It's quite difficult to work out which functions work & which don't. Thanks.
    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • This was snapped during a lunch.  Total shooting time—a few seconds. We so often read that a proper "portrait" should be snapped with a longer than normal lens, a low ISO to get lots of detail, and have a soft light held up above the head, and slightly to the side. The key, in my opinion, is always carry a camera.  Have your camera available to capture candid, authentic photographs.  Available light, no posing.   This portrait used 2000 ISO, the lens wide open at f4, and 1/100 sec. to stop any movement.  I didn't even take time to compose—I just snapped.  I leave the "Face Detection" on unless I'm photographing a landscape or subject other than a person. The GFX100RF has the equivalent of a 28mm lens.  The large sensor renders fine detail even at fairly high ISO ratings.  And the drawing of the lens is just perfect in my opinion.  It was set to B & W, with slightly reduced sharpness and clarity (set in-camera).  Ideal for "portraits."  Now, for some subjects I will likely increase the sharpness and clarity to the normal setting.  The camera is new, and I'm still experimenting with it.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...