FX 60mm 2.4 Macro

[dv.]

×××× OPEN THREAD ×××*

feel free to add any images taken with FX60mm 2.4 Macro

 

more snail photos can be found here: http://ourphoto.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=5890

 

 

 

[dv.]

 

[dv.]

 

 

more can be found here: http://ourphoto.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=6043

[Enzio]

one from me ...

 

XE108893 by Enzio Harpaintner, auf Flickr

[milandro]

a different approach to nature

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

[Russ]

Leaf Skeleton # 4 by Russell Dixon, on Flickr

[mnscott]

Taken earlier today, just as rain clouds moved in.

 

[winspeare]

What is the focusing like now on the x-t1? I had this lens on the x-e1 and sold it because of the autofocus (and the 1:2 ratio)

[romain]

af on an xt-1 works fine if you use it in good lighting conditions without the macro mode on, but not great otherwise. I can live with it till it's replaced though

[Xavier Schotte]

My contribution. X-Pro1 + XF 60mm.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

[marcelo_valente]

Looking at you by Marcelo Valente, on Flickr

[marcelo_valente]

Some, non macro shots:

 

Weekly photo project 2014 Week 46 - Negative Space by Marcelo Valente, on Flickr

 

FXE21956.jpg by Marcelo Valente, on Flickr

 

Week Photo Project 2014 - Week 51 - Smiles by Marcelo Valente, on Flickr

 

No no no!!! by Marcelo Valente, on Flickr

 

FXE21992.jpg by Marcelo Valente, on Flickr

 

FXE21990.jpg by Marcelo Valente, on Flickr

 

FXE21963.jpg by Marcelo Valente, on Flickr

[PhotoDan]

Would like to post here but can't figure out how to add a photo to it

[marcelo_valente]

Where are your photos? Flickr? From Flickr you should share using bbcode...medium is a good size.

[Red G8R]

These are great photos.

But I wish Fuji upgraded this macro lens or planned a 90mm. The upcoming 120mm is way too big for the Fuji bodies, IMHO. I've now ordered the Zeiss Touit 50mm macro and even that focal length might not be ideal but at least it's about the same size as the Fuji 60.

[marcelo_valente]

These are great photos.

But I wish Fuji upgraded this macro lens or planned a 90mm. The upcoming 120mm is way too big for the Fuji bodies, IMHO. I've now ordered the Zeiss Touit 50mm macro and even that focal length might not be ideal but at least it's about the same size as the Fuji 60.

I read the Zeiss had 1:1 magnification, which is a plus over the xf60mm

 

Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

[Xavier Schotte]

Another shot with the X-Pro1.
I like the 60 for portraits too.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

[marcelo_valente]

The 60 is a fantastic lens, but gets bad reputation because of the focus, which is true.

[fujixguy]

Freddy at Special Edition: NYC 2015 comic convention

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[fujixguy]

I own both the 56 and the 60. Although they are close in focal length, they are different enough in other ways to justify owning both. In good light, I find the 60 with its close focus ability to be more versatile. And being smaller and lighter, it is much easier to carry.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Enzio]

...

 

Schloss Oberschleißheim .... by Enzio Harpaintner, auf Flickr

[dannat]

does anyone know if the 60 AF's well enough with a raynox macro filter in tow? i am surprised how well my 18-55 AF's with the raynox 250 in place on the x-e1

[marcelo_valente]

does anyone know if the 60 AF's well enough with a raynox macro filter in tow? i am surprised how well my 18-55 AF's with the raynox 250 in place on the x-e1

The 60 with the raynox works the same, but if you are that close it's easier to focus manually and moving the camera back and forward. If you will use it you will need to buy a 39mm filter, if it's a cheap one remove the glass. This is because when the lens retracts the raynox will hit the lens body and will not allow the lens mechanism to work correctly, you need some kind of "spacer" to move the raynox a bit further away.

 

If you want some specific test I can do it for you.

 

Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

[pez]

I love this lens and frequently use it with a LED ring light a cheaper one that does not flash. OK the lens cover is naff. but I leave it off most of the time.  Low res pic attached.  The Ring LED was used.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

[Maurice]

You did notice that image looks like it would on a 8 bit Atari computer ?