Jump to content

dannat

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

dannat's Achievements

  1. some of those unhappy are trying it on Sony FF chips -it wasn't designed to cover this. on aps-c it should be alright
  2. i wish they would drop the 100mm section, & make it 200-400, i find 100-200 mostly unusale -its either too close or doesn't get you close enough. im fine with f5.6 at 400mm -no faster needed -it adds too much bulk/weight. actualy id be happy if they made it a prime, either 300/4 or 400/5.6 with OIS
  3. does anyone know if the 60 AF's well enough with a raynox macro filter in tow? i am surprised how well my 18-55 AF's with the raynox 250 in place on the x-e1
×
×
  • Create New...