Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,

I recently sold my Canon 5D Mark iii as I wanted something smaller to take everywhere I go and I have grown to love Fuji! I am between the brand new XT3, X100F, and the XE3. I want to have the camera everywhere I go and I do a lot of street photography. I was hoping I could hear some opinions on which camera would suit me best.

Thanks,

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Three completely different cameras. The X100F has a fixed lens and, unless you don't need anything more, you can go for that. However, you might find yourself in a situation you need a different lens.
So I'd go for the XT3 or the XE3. Apart the characteristics, you should go in a shop and handle both, since they're two different philosophies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I think it's impossible compare the XT3 whit the others two cameras, simply because the size, so different. Sorry Steve, I don't think that "XT3 would provide you with everything". AndrewB if you "want to have the camera everywhere I go and you do a lot of street photography" with the XT3 you're going to have quite problems.

Cheers

Edited by Paco
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an XPro2, an XE3, and an X100F. Love them all and if I had the XT3 I’d love that as well. But I find myself walking out the door with the X100F or the XE3 more often than the Pro 2. If I could only have one, I’d go with the XE3 for three reasons - its small, I can change lenses, and it feels great in use.  So does the X100F - so how do I distinguish — the ability to change lenses. But if I were you, I’d get both. They are FUN and the output in phenonmenal. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you said you could afford two Fuji models, I would go with the X100F and the XT20 (don't overlook this option) or XT3. If you can only have one, and you wants as small a footprint as you can get while still having some lens options, I would go with the X-E3. If you are are certain that a 23mm (35mm fov on full frame) will suit the vast majority of your needs and you can only have one Fuji, I would go with the X100F.

The XT3 is the largest and certainly gets you away from the concept that the X100F and the XE3 provides. However, having owned all the models listed above, I don't find the XT3 to be as large as some articles and reviews suggest. I guess it is all in the feel of the beholder, but I was expecting a feel or experience that was significantly different than the XT20 and, while larger, I don't find it any more challenging or difficult or cumbersome to take the XT3 anywhere I took the XT20. But, as with all things, others may have a different impression.

  • X100F if you are absolutely certain 23mm is all you need and you like the retro rangefinder look
  • XE3 if you want the smallest footprint that lets you change lenses. (XE3 is a sweet camera)
  • XT3 (or XT20) if you want traditional SLR look and additional features at a cost 
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you " want to have the camera everywhere I go "  and different focal lengths , you are looking for a very small foot-print with a zoom lens. I would say it has to get into a coat pocket and no extra accessory.

None of the actual Fuji cameras fit the bill.......and like you, I am waiting for Fuji to produce that camera.

So for the time being I am with another brand and  keep waiting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the X100F but do sometimes find the wide angle lens just a bit too wide.  I take street and architecture mostly so a short zoom is plenty but as a petite older female, I like a petite camera that is unobtrusive, fits into a coat pocket and that no-one notices.  So like tooppy i am with another make for now.  Having said that, the picture quality of the Fuji is stunning, as is the level of control you have over everything the camera can do, but take a week off to get through the instruction book first or you won’t know what you’re doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

X-E3 is very versatile and discrete. My casual walkabout kit comprises E1 or E2 with 27mm pancake and a tiny 50mm f2.O Jupiter (Leica thread) lens in a pocket. Can’t get to like the faux pentaprism of the T series, but most forum members seem to love it, judging by number of posts.

try handling both in a good camera shop - if you can find one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...