Jump to content

lleo

Members
  • Content Count

    236
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About lleo

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

942 profile views
  1. The i40 has the "hidden" HSS function in manual mode. If I remember well, I've read somewhere that with the update this function disappear.
  2. lleo

    s

    I'd go for the 35 only because the 23 it's a closer focal to the 16. Anyways you should go to the shop with your camera and try both before to decide.
  3. If you have the chance, try two samples. There's no one lens like the other
  4. Yep, expecially the last one. Island muss wunderschön sein
  5. Being made in Japan is quite good, though the price won't drop as quickly as for the other models. Actually the X-Pro 2 is the model that maintains the price better and longer than all other Fujis. Whatever the guys at Fuji want to put on the model it's fine with me. However a silver model would be appreciated.
  6. Same construction, different results. Here it is: https://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/5770-35mm-comparison/ Saying that the f/2 is superior to the f/1,4 it means lying. Anyways, this particular sample. Another one might be better. Lenses are assembled by hand and not two are identical. That's why I always compare two or more, if available at the shop, before to buy it. I've been doing this through the last... probably 30 years or more. And it always worked. By the way, in the new series it seems that the better ones are the 23 and the 50. The 35 is the weaker one.
  7. It should have an options in the menu, rule of thirds and others. It has probably to do with display, try to check there.
  8. Yep but you're comparing two different lenses. Anyways the 23 is simply great. Mine had awesome starlights.
  9. Check the post: the 35 f/1,4 is much sharper and detailed than the f/2 which, in the case, is not even a 35. The FOV speaks clearly. However, the 23 f/2 I owned was quite better than the 23 f/1,4. Which, in the majority of the cases, is better than the new f/2. As I wrote, you always must to try a len before to buy it, execially if you can try two or more of the same model.
  10. Here is a SMC Super Takumar but 85-210. My advice is to try them all before to decide. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144829918@N02/albums/72157675654758400
  11. The 23 f/2 is super. Mon, I owned both, the 23 and 35 f/2. The latter wasn''t as good as the f/1,4. If you check here, there''s a post where I compared the two: the f/1,4 is way superior. But, having said so, you always have to try the lenses by yourself. The best thing is when the shop have more samples of the same lens, so you can compare them before to buy. Usually they differ from each other.
  12. Yep, it's plenty of great manual lenses to use on the Fujis
  13. Or... you have to use the EVF in your X-Pro2, so the 1,4 won't bother the view
  14. IBIS should work regardless of the lens you use. I don't own the X-H1 so I'm talking by logic. In some tests they affirm that if you have a OIS lens, you'll have a double IS, on the lens and in the body. However I saw some tests and even if Fuji states you have 5 stops because of the IBIS, they're about 3 in reality.
×
×
  • Create New...