Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I just booked 3 days Easter Holidays in Rome.... Gear Recommendations Anyone?

What I have "in stock" at the moment... I won't take more than 3 lenses and 1 body.

BODIES
- X-T1
- X-E3

LENSES
- Samyang 12mmF2
- XF 23mmF1.4
- XF 35mmF1.4
- XF 27mmF2.8
- XF 10-24
- XF18-55
- XF 18-135
- XF 55-200

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just come back from Rome, and I took the following

 

X-E2s  with 14mm2.8 - 23mm1.4 - 27mm 2.8 and 35mm 1.4.

At no point did I feel I was lacking a lens.

 

I know this is 4 lenses, but the 27 is a no brainer due to its size, turns the X-E2 into a good pocket camera.

 

Enjoy Rome - and don't buy to many selfie sticks :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

X-E3, 10-24, 35, 55-200.

 

I find Rome at night is fantastic. Fewer people x Long Exposures make for some surreal views.

 

Don't eat at places with English menus. They're almost always touristy crap. Bring your phone, Google Translate (whatever the AR app is) works great and you'll at least be able to get a general idea of what you're ordering. Or you can do what I do, pick the busy restaurants (empty restaurants is never a good sign) and ask them to make you whatever the specialty of the house is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Take the XT2 for the articulated LCD for low angles along with the 10-24 and 18-55. I've been to Rome and about 60% of the shots were taken with the 10-24 lens. The ultra wide angle is useful for tight city streets and expansive church interiors.

 

Regards,

Bud James
 
www.budjames.photography
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am also going to Rome this summer and will also bring 1 camera and 3 lenses.

My setup will be.

X-t2,

XF 18-135, for more close ups of the statues and monuments. Perhaps also for some tighter shots from the surrounding hills.

XF 10-24, for inside the buildings and some wide shots, and

XF 23mmF2, for street and filming. Still in doubt whether to bring my XF 16mmF1.4 instead. The 23mm is small and lighter compared to the 16mm..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also going to Rome this summer and will also bring 1 camera and 3 lenses.

My setup will be.

X-t2,

XF 18-135, for more close ups of the statues and monuments. Perhaps also for some tighter shots from the surrounding hills.

XF 10-24, for inside the buildings and some wide shots, and

XF 23mmF2, for street and filming. Still in doubt whether to bring my XF 16mmF1.4 instead. The 23mm is small and lighter compared to the 16mm..

Absolutely, the 23mm is light and small. However, the 16mm is significantly wider and able to work at half the light-level. It weighs 375 grams while the 23mm is 180 grams. I will happily lug an extra 200 grams for the vastly increased capability the 16mm provides. Both the 35mm and the 16mm are covered by the 10-24mm, but it is an f/4.0 which takes great care to use effectively in low light situations. At f/1.4, the 16mm opens up the darkness. 

 

Is 200 grams too heavy for all the great interior shots you will bypass?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...