Jump to content

Recommended Posts

They may be taller, but they look to take up the same real estate on the top plate as they do on the T1.

 

First world problems I guess.  For all we know, this isn't even legit.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Turbo Boost" reminds me of the old PC's that would have a "Turbo" button on them, lol (showing my age).  I would of preferred "High Performance" instead.

 

Yeah, i can't really explain why, but this "boost" - label is a HUGE letdown for me. Its something i would not expect to be printed on top of a premium quality camera, but rather onto some cheap toy car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The things that excites me most about the ISO and SS dial is that the lcok button look like the top part is black and the lower part is grey, suggesting to me that these are not latched. Ie click up dial spins freely, click down dial is locked. If that is the case I will be one happy camper, because the ISO dial annoys the f out of me currently, and is the only thing that makes me remove camera from my eye. If they have implmented this I will have all the controls I need at my fingers without needing to remove camera from eye.

 

While they are at it, could they move the ISO read out in the EVF to the left hand side of the screen and the SS to the RIght hand side, it hurts my brain to turn the ISO knob on the left and look at the right hand side of the screen.

 

G

Edited by gordonrussell76
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I do hope those a toggle switches that will let us lock the dials when WE want to.  Although I've never noticed the location of the ISO info being displayed on the right hand side, changing it around is a good suggestion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, i can't really explain why, but this "boost" - label is a HUGE letdown for me. Its something i would not expect to be printed on top of a premium quality camera, but rather onto some cheap toy car.

I would of preffered "nitro engage" and a bright blue oversized led button. And a little stick shift on top to change drive modes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would of preffered "nitro engage" and a bright blue oversized led button. And a little stick shift on top to change drive modes.

 

Well, the X-T2 got a joystick, shouldn't be a problem to glue a little 8-ball on there. And painting some fancy racing stripes across the body should doable, too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

three batteries in total would equal about 1150 shots. Close but still not DSLR range

If I'm shooting a job and being battery conscious (EVF + eye sensor and turning the camera off when I don't immediately need it) I can consistently get 600 shots off of a battery with my X-T1. What I usually do is switch out the grip battery as needed and keep the in-body battery as a backup. If the X-T2 has similar battery performance, that should mean an easy 1500-2000 shots.

 

What I'm most excited about are the joystick on the vertical grip and (what looks to be) an extended horizontal grip that the vertical grip adds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just wish they would let us access all three batteries without removing the grip. Or maybe this one does?

 

Looks like the two batteries in the grip slide in from the side, easily accessible. The one in the camera is fine where it is i think. Probably just in there as a backup most of the time.

Assuming it only starts using that battery when the other two are completely depleted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the X-T2 got a joystick, shouldn't be a problem to glue a little 8-ball on there. And painting some fancy racing stripes across the body should doable, too.

 

If you need a racing stripe, your best bet is buying an old Nikon F3 :D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woohoo locking dials and a video option on the drive dial happy camper here where do I place my advance order :)

 

I am not massively happy about the new EV dial, but seeing as how I'll never use it I guess I will just deal with it :)

Edited by gordonrussell76
Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that it looks as though its the same one on the X-Pro2 when I tried a X-Pro 2 out recently I found the dial on that particular model to move a little too freely for my liking, it was also too big for my preference and I don't like the C functionality I think it over complicates it all. 

 

However and lets be honest here I am not a huge fan of EV at all, I prefer working in full manual majority of the time. Now that ISO dial is going to be free moving I doubt I will ever touch the EV knob again. But others like it so I am glad its there. I am happy for features I have no use for to be present. I get that others have a use for them. I am also humble enough to realize that many features I don't use now might be because of my own failings in understanding and as I grow as a photographer I may find I do use them. 

 

So whats the release date going to be eh. I am off to Canada on an amazing 3 weeks trip around Vancouver Island, the smaller islands the rockies and onakagen valley. I fly 8th August, do you think the X-T2 will be available by then. I am was originally thinking very very unlikely, but now we are starting to see images, and given June announcement. On the other hand the earthquake makes me wonder whether it might be further delayed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The X-T2 also looks like it is bigger, which I see as a negative. Besides, I would not want to do without an optical viewfinder.

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

I blame this part on that silly 4k video feature that less than 15% of users are going to use but we will have to cope with the size increase >.>

Link to post
Share on other sites

I blame this part on that silly 4k video feature that less than 15% of users are going to use but we will have to cope with the size increase >.>

I think that is a correct assumption indeed.

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

I blame this part on that silly 4k video feature that less than 15% of users are going to use but we will have to cope with the size increase >.>

 

I'm not 100% convinced of that with small point and shoot fixed lens cameras and the Panasonic GH4, GX8 all shooting 4K and having a smaller body than the XT2.  They are a bit smaller due to smaller sensor, but compared to their conterparts that don't shoot 4K they are roughly the same size.

 

It's fair to assume that the XT2 would not be identical to the size of the XT1, but if any larger .... I'm expecting it to be pretty negligible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...