Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well, Other than a new X-T2 with 24mp or higher I'm very happy with my lenses.

I own the Zeiss 12, the 18-55 (outstanding), the 35 1.4, and the 55-200.

I got into the mirror less Fuji in order to cut back on the weight that I was carrying around so these lenses pretty much wraps it up for me unless something amazing crops up.  The 90, 120, none of those light my fire.  Before I purchased the 55-200 I seriously considered the 50-140 but due to the size and weight, I decided to opt for the 55-200 and "put up" with minor annoyances of it missing focus on occasion, and that "are you happy to see me" lens protrusion when racked out to 200mm.   :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an XE-2, current lens are 18-55, 27, 56, 60. I am still on the fence over which telephoto zoom, but leaning towards the 55-200, as much for its smaller size and weight as the cost. Others on my list:

 

18 f2 to complete smaller prime collection

35 f2 "  "   "   "   "   "

14 F2.8 or 16 F1.4

120 Macro with 1.4X converter 

 

Hope Fuji comes out with a 200 prime, F4 would be fine for me

 

Rod S

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wishlist:

 

18-35 1.8 WR, for travel use. I travel weekly, so this would be my all time kit.

120 WR Macro, for macro and portrait use.

35 1.4 WR, as general evening walkaround and 'round-the-house lens.

 

All with linear motors please, my 50-140 made me appreciate those :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys!

 

I got:

 

10-24 

 

23 1.4

 

50-140

 

Wondering for fast ultrawide (mean wider than 16mm) something like 9mm, 10mm at least 2.8. Or new 10-24 WR 2.8 kinda.

 

Maybe 23mm WR? (But in a video about 16mm on youtube, guy from Fujifilm Australia said that, there is no problem to shoot 23mm 1.4 in the rain so it`s not a big deal I guess  :) used them abused them, no problem so far)

 

And of course, some sort of ultra fast prime would be interesting to have, smth. like 33 F0,95. It`s possible, optical schemes are already exist so yeah, why not. 

 

Tilt-shift, at least few of them. And fisheye from FUJI, not rokinon etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes yes yes...buy the lens that fit your work/photographic needs. We all know this, but it doesn't stop us photographers from salivating over other lenses that we might not actually 'need' but rather 'want' for some reason or another. I have this problem and I will eventually find the means/reason to buy them lol. In the meanwhile, here's my wishlist...

 

1. XF16-55 F2.8 R LM WR (want to sell of the XF 18-55 for this)

 

2. XF50-140 F2.8 R LM OIS WR

 

3. XF56 F1.2R APD

 

4. XF10-24 F4 R OIS (pls Fuji...make a WR version for this lens....pls)

 

 

What are some of yours?

I have exactly those lenses except my 56 is not APD. Really think Fuji doing some excellent lenses. Next step is to make more of them WR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

100-400 zoom and 120 macro

 

The 90 was on it before news of the 120 came out.

 

For primes, I have 14, 23, and 56 so the 120 will fit the progression nicely.

For zooms, I have the 18-55 OIS and 18-135 OIS. The 100-400 will, I hope, have OIS or I will need a much faster sensor or need to consider the 55-200.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use two combos now:
 

1) XF23 1.4 R + XF56 1.2 R

 

2) XF16 1.4 R WR + XF35 1.4 R

 

Wishlist....

 

XF16 F2 R WR (maybe smaller than F1.4...)

 

XF23 F2 R WR (maybe smaller than F1.4... and I don't think it's much usefull to have so fast lenses for <23mm)

 

XF27 F2 R WR mk II pancake better than actual XF27

 

XF35 1.4 R WR mk II which I love most

Link to post
Share on other sites

 If Fuji make a 70mm f/2 or faster, I'll pre-order one on the day of announcement and pay any price.

 

 

me too.. i'm not sure about the 90mm being to long for me.. i will give it a try.. but again not sure if i will like it.. (just the focal lenght everything other will be awsome i guess) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone,

 

New to this forum, but been following the FR posts on Facebook for a long time. I am a big photography buff. I am not a professional photographer; but an academic and a policy analyst who uses photography to aid in my work. I have a huge library of bodies and optics, mostly in retro styling. I know for some of the folks it may sound like GAS or too much money to throw around. Well, both are correct; now couple that with a little bit craziness...and Bob's your uncle.

 

I have Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Lumix, and Leica gear, but we are primarily a Fuji household. I kinda work with a three lenses per body strategy. Following is my current Fuji gear coupled with lenses. I only use specific bodies with those specific lenses, very rarely do I deviate from this rule. I shoot JPEGs only and I have defined two custom shooting formulas (profiles) to each lens, one color and one black & white. There are some pictures of the gear on my 500px (www.500px.com/oterrason) and Flickr (www.flickr.com/oterrason) photo galleries.

 

X-Pro1

- 18mm f/2

- 35mm f/1.4

- 60mm f/2.4 Macro

 

X-E2 (Black)

- 10-24mm f/4

- 18-55mm f/2.8-4

- 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8

 

X-T1 (Graphite)

- 14mm f/2.8

- 23mm f/1.4

- 56mm f/1.2 (Non-APD)

 

X-T1 (Black)

- 16mm f/1.4

- 16-55mm f/2.8

- 50-140mm f/2.8

 

X-T10 (Black)

- Touit 12mm f/2.8

- Touit 32mm f/1.8

- Touit 50mm f/2.8 Macro

 

Still in the household, my daughter shoots with:

 

X100T (silver)

- Wide Angle and Telephoto attachments

 

X-E2 (Silver)

- 27mm f/2.8

- Jackar 'Snapshooter' 34mm f/1.8

- Lensbaby Velvet 56mm f/1.7

 

I have the 90mm f/2 on order, and shall be buying the 35mm f/2 and the 120mm f/2.8 Macro when they are released. I'd like Fujifilm to develop 23mm f/1.4 and 56mm f/1.2 lenses with weather resistance. I think it will also be a very cool if Zeiss comes out with its X-mount trio in weatherized versions.

 

Omer...

Link to post
Share on other sites

These are my actual lenses - and my wishlist

 

16mm f1.4 (I sold my 14mm f2.8 to buy it, and love it).

 

I wanted to do that too, but decided to keep both. I think perspective distortion is better controlled in the 14mm f/2.8 when shooting architecture; 16mm f/1.4 is better with organic subjects. BTW, nice pictures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

- 10-23mm f/2.8-4 (eq. to 15-34mm) smaller and lighter then current 10-24 f4

- 16-70mm f/2.8-3.5 (eq. to 24-105mm) similar size to current 18-55 f2.8-4 better with macro abilities like oly 12-40

- 70-275mm f/3.5-4.8 (eq to 105-412mm) similar size to current 55-200 f3.5-4.8

 

All with size, weight and AF speed in mind, water resistant and sharp at all focal lenght even wide open.

Match them with a new sensor XT-2 with 5 Axis in body/dual IS stabilization and I could go anywhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...