-
Posts
55 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Forums
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by PascallacsaP
-
-
Seascapes from Zeeland, the Netherlands (X100S)
Autumn beach 1 by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr
Autumn beach 2 by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr
- Ektachrome and papedo
- 2
-
Fujinon 56mm does landscape (X-T1):
Foggy dawn 1 by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr
Foggy dawn 2 by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr
-
This is just brillant.
Thanks a lot!
-
Shot with the XF 60mm f2.4 macro. This is a 3 image manual HDR rendered in Capture One and merged in Lightroom. The view is from the Bastei near Dresden in Germany around 07:00 AM.
Very nice photo, but maybe you should post it a bit larger.
-
- eilex, yeemiau, Ektachrome and 2 others
- 5
-
- PSantos, Golden Oxen, Enzio and 2 others
- 5
-
- bigbadwolf, Es_Dior, Harlem and 5 others
- 8
-
-
View from Castel Beseno, Trentino, Italy (X100S)
Castel Beseno 3 by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr
Castel Beseno 4 by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr
- papedo and Ektachrome
- 2
-
- Steve C, Patrick FR and brusco
- 3
-
Flashmob in the streets of Rovereto, Trentino, Italy (X100S)
(In)visible Dancing 1 by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr
(In)visible Dancing 2 by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr
-
- Ektachrome, olli and CRAusmus
- 3
-
- Ektachrome, Ziggy and KaptajnKnass
- 3
-
-
You almost convinced me...
Don't want to change anyone's mind. Was just giving an opinion (that's what the OP was asking for, right?).
Keep up the good work and be happy with whatever you own!
-
What's wrong with hearsay if the source is good?
Anyway, I haven't decided yet...
-
Pascal, test the lens yourself, don’t go by people whom you don’t know !
I haven’t tested both lenses BUT for the money it costs I found that the results were very good indeed! I couldn’t possibly say that the two lenses are identical though.
Read here ( there are already several open threads on this lens!)
http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/292-the-humble-though-honorable-xc-50-230mm-f-45-67/
I agree with you that testing both lenses is probably the best thing to do (if I just had the time), but I am quite sure that at the end I will prefer a lens that is better built and gives me that slightly better control over exposure and DOF. This is not to say that the 50-230mm is a much weaker lens. It's just a personal preference.
-
Both lenses were tested by Photozone:
50-230:
http://www.photozone.de/fuji_x/880-fuji50230f4567
55-200:
http://www.photozone.de/fuji_x/879-fuji55200f3548
55-200 seems significantly better optically, especially with regard to sharpness.
I am also considering the purchase of a telephoto lens for my X-T1 and I will definitely go for the 55-200. The reach is not much different from the 50-230 really, but the sharpness and aperture range definitely is. To me this alone is worth the price difference.
-
-
-
-
Great shot!
Thanks!
-
On Flickr go to your photostream. Click on the photo you want to post. That will open the photopage for that image. Click on the share icon (on the lower right, it's the third of a group of four and looks like an arrow pointing right). On the box that pops up select BB Code and select the size you want to post from the drop down list. Then copy the link and paste it straight into the reply box on the forum. If you want to make sure it has worked you can click on the 'More Reply Options' on the bottom right and hit 'Preview Post'.
Hope this helps.
Thanks a lot Olli!
-
X100S in the streets of Trento, Italy
Very busy man (cinematic) by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr
Thanks for the tip Olli!
landscapes with fuji x
in Landscape & Travel
Posted · Edited by PascallacsaP
Recent outing with my new 55-200mm lens (mounted on my X-T1).
Another misty morning 1 by Pascal van Gerven, on Flickr