Jump to content

Why does this camera have a top display?!?!


Recommended Posts

The GFX has 2 modes. All external dials and all menu based like a conventional digital slr. In the 2nd mode, the top display is to facilitate quick access to settings. The lens has a C setting which enables you to control the aperture using the assigned dial on the camera body. Clever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My previous Nikon D600 had a LCD on top - as most other DSLRs do. I don't miss it on my X-Pro2, but still it was kind of helpful on the D600 and would be helpful on the X-Pro2 especially when shooting with the screen switched off and only use EVF. You have all the information you need on a tiny screen.

Edited by menphrad
Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the top display and the pretend prism housing are design clues to signal that it's a serious pro camera.  Just in case we missed the clues from the $5000 price tag and the huge sensor.

 

Same reason that every movie these days is a remake of an old movie - the accountants will not allow the designers/directors to take any risks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same reason that every movie these days is a remake of an old movie - the accountants will not allow the designers/directors to take any risks. 

 

In this, I honestly believe that there are no more new stories which would turn into a classic in future. The works of Grimm brothers, Hans Christian Anderson and Stan Lee are limited......and therefore needs to be remade.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Honestly a mini top screen with finger dials is much more efficient than the classic fuji dials. I totally understand why people love them, and I'm glad fuji has provided options for both.

 

From what I've read you can configure the dials to adjust whatever settings you want, which is also great. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I don't need a LCD on the back.

 

I know one guy... He checks what he'd shot weeks later because it's like to shoot the roll of film - abstract and calm down - send it to the lab - get it back - scan and finaly look at what he's got... saying WTF is that!?! :lol:

Edited by mdm
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know one guy... He checks what he'd shot weeks later because it's like to shoot the roll of film - abstract and calm down - send it to the lab - get it back - scan and finaly look at what he's got... saying WTF is that!?! :lol:

Actually that's good practice. More people should do that. It removes the emotional attachment you may have had to a certain moment and allows you to judge the shot more for how good it actually is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually that's good practice. More people should do that.

 

Well, I just partly agree. This practice might be ok providing you've got the series of good shots and later on you will choose the best. However by some reason you may have the series of bad shots and even don't be aware about it if you didn't check the results briefly while shooting. No?

Edited by mdm
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I just partly agree. This practice might be ok providing you've got the series of good shots and later on you will choose the best. However by some reason you may have the series of bad shots and even don't be aware about it if you didn't check the results briefly while shooting. No?

If it's paid work, sure, check it while you're shooting.

 

But I rarely review anymore when shooting. With the evf I know my exposure beforehand and if you're not shooting everything wide open, focus should usually be fine too.

 

I usually have the X-T2 in my work bag and I'll review the shots only once my 7 day duty is over. Works for me, helps me be brutal when culling shots.

 

Not that long ago film was still king and there was no such thing as checking the shot until it came back from the lab.

 

I still shoot film on occasion for the zen of it. It's good practice for everyone.

Edited by Tom H.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The reason for the top display is that a lot of pros shoot and waist level or even lower (sometimes with the camera on a very short tripod on the floor; think automobile editorial photography, for example) in the studio. Many, many pros used Rolleiflex TLR, Hassy CMs, all with a waist-level viewfinder for decades.

 

Also, remember the attachable viewfinder will tilt up (vertical) with it's adapter; this is also for intended for waist level use. The top display is very useful for shooting this way. 

 

Fuji is very good at really understanding it's customer's needs; they think every design decision through very thoroughly, the design features are there for sound reasons. 

Edited by Puma Cat
Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually that's good practice. More people should do that. It removes the emotional attachment you may have had to a certain moment and allows you to judge the shot more for how good it actually is.

It *IS* a good practice. I will often go back to images from photography events, workshops or holidays months or even a few years later and review the "take", look for new insights into an image, and also, often will re-process a "select" with the new tools that are always available. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will often go back to images from photography events, workshops or holidays months or even a few years later and review the "take"

 

Yes, I do the same with old images, but when I came from shooting walk I won't wait neither a week nor a single day cause I feel like a boy with a bag of toys my mom just bought me and brought home. Not in this case really. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • It is really easy to find out if the wifi is on. Your computer or tablet or cell phone will have a network settings dealing with wifi, bluetooth, ethernet or “other”. Open that up and go into the section for wifi, and take note of which networks are listed. Turn on the camera and keep watching the list of networks. If your camera’s wifi is turned on, a new network should suddenly show up in your computer/tablet/phone’s network listings. Now go into the camera’s menus and start a wireless connection (the x-app or camera remote app can help you with this). You should see a network show up now. It is not hidden because it has to be visible so that your computer/tablet/phone can join the camera’s network to transfer images. Turn the camera off and that network should disappear. Turn the camera back on and see what happens.
    • Sweet Creek Falls, Oregon. X-H1, Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Acros.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I think my Fuji 150-600 F8 is a brilliant wildlife lens in terms of sharpness, portability and value but the small aperture does cause issues at the start and end of the day - even pushing the ISO as far as I dare, I can see shutter speed down to 1/25s - stabilisation isn't an issue but asking a deer to stand still for that is too much! In the same situation, an F4 would give 1/100s so the difference to the success rate would be phenomenal... and that's without the other improvements like shallower depth of field. I also find that the Fuji's subject detect AF gets pretty iffy in low light - I keep updating to the latest firmware but it doesn't seem to get any better. I was originally looking at the Nikon 500mm F4 E but good examples secondhand are still reasonably expensive but like-for-like Sigma lenses are around half the price. Reviews I have read suggest that they are as good optically, AF performance and IS-wise but you gain a few hundred grams of weight (but less than the older Nikon model). For a couple of grand, I can live with that. Does anyone have any experience mounting one on an XH2S? What about with the 1.4 teleconverter? It feels like that is pushing it anyway - hefty lens + TC + Fringer all sounds a bit...wobbly? It is on the Fringer approved list but I am wary about AF speed in particular. I had also considered looking for a used Nikon 400mm F2.8, which would be even faster (and heavier) and could couple with a TC to give 560mm F4 but again, it is that lens+TC+Fringer combination that worries me as being just too many links in the chain. Of course, what I really want is a native Fuji prime but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon - and if you look at what Nikon and Sony are doing, if Fuji do ever bring out a 500mm prime, it will probably be a small, light and cheapish F5.6, which is only 2/3 stop better than my zoom at the same focal length. Any thoughts anyone?
    • The Amazon link is an annoying feature of this forum - its automatic and is applied to every post for advertising purposes. My question was - how do you know the camera wi-fi is on and requires turning off? I would have thought this would just use up the battery for no purpose if you aren't specifically using a function that requires wi-fi.
    • I've made a point to push Angelbird memory products as they are the best performance cards you can get, The sustained write speed is important.
×
×
  • Create New...