Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree with Larry, I would rather have a delay and receive a camera that performs as advertised and improves on the pre-production versions used by the 100 "testers" than one that has glitches that need fixes from the start.

 

I am not normally an early adopter but I love the X-Pro1 so much with the latest firmware that the X-Pro2 being an evolution rather than a new camera is a bit of a no brainer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Larry, I would rather have a delay and receive a camera that performs as advertised and improves on the pre-production versions used by the 100 "testers" than one that has glitches that need fixes from the start.

 

I have to agree with that. I hate waiting, and now waiting even longer, but I'd rather have it right than have it soon. Here's hoping it won't be delayed more than a few weeks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

These delays are super annoying.  They keep saying it's because of high demand, but why wouldn't they just ship out the ones that are ready to those that preordered early on?  I love my XT1, but the Xpro2 has some nice advantages I'm planning on using at weddings this year.  hurry up Fuji!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree.  It makes no sense to delay shipping X-Pro 2's to Fuji retailers as they are assembled, tested, packaged, and shipped.  The delayed shipping date of X-Pro 2's from Fuji in Japan tells me that Fuji is having an issue with obtaining components for the cameras from parts suppliers, or Fuji is still tinkering with the camera to cut down on the number of future firmware updates it will need to issue after sales commence.

 

If the latter is the case, Fuji may be dealing with the law of unintended consequences -  making modification "X" to add or better a particular feature, thereby causing an undesired effect "Y" to occur. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not that unusual for B&H and Adorama to be conservative with due dates for high-demand items. And no one complains if the stuff gets out a little earlier than the published due date. The most likely scenario is that demand is higher than they can fulfill with their originally scheduled first shipment. First camera from Fuji with a (potentially) better sensor - first new sensor in 4 years? Yeah, it's demand. Way too late in the game for most of the other scenarios - undiscovered flaw, etc.... Some may find Thom's analysis of the D500 delay interesting reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kevin Mullins says he has received the final production firmware for the X-Pro2, so it seems whatever the bug was they needed to fix, they have fixed it. I assume that means that all of the cameras that were already made, boxed up and packaged for shipping are now going to have to be opened back up and updated before they are boxed up again, repackaged and shipped out. I hope they are working overtime to get that done so we don't have to wait too much longer to get our cameras. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At a local photostore in Sweden yesterday when they showed a X-Pro2 with the final production release version. Yes its ready to ship.

 

 

How would a local store in Sweden know anything? Over here, shipping starts on 10MAR. That is if nothing else happens. And by the way, I hope that Fuji will revisit this so-called production firmware. While it does work, there are still a few things in it that should be taken care of. In any case, firmware certainly wasn't the reason to delay the hardware. But hey, what do I know? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Fuji staffer in Singapore says its a small hardware issue invoving the shutter release. Something about the shutter getting randomly stuck. It may be due to a tight weather sealing gasket. Its best they fix the issue first if that indeed is the only issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Fuji staffer in Singapore told me the delay may be caused by a small hardware issue invoving the shutter release. Something about the shutter getting randomly stuck. Possibly due to an overly tight weather sealing gasket. Its best they fix the issue first before shipping - if that indeed is the only issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • In reply to the original question, it all depends on what you mean by infrared.  If you mean "see thermal information", then I agree with the comments here.  However, if you mean near-infrared, the X-T4, or basically any digital camera can be modified to "see" it.  Check out Lifepixel.com and Kolarivision.com for more info. As regards lenses, I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • No - I don’t think so - it means you can take pictures if you remove the lens completely - but I’m not sure that is a problem
    • I bought a manual lens over xmas and it took me a while to find the "shutter w/o lens" function in the menu settings.  So far I haven't found a way to either put that on the Q menu or marry that setting to one of the 4 custom modes.   Am I missing something? Is there a problem if I just leave that setting enabled even when the OEM auto lens is in place? tia
    • It appears that Apple now (at last!) fully supports FujiFilm Lossless and Compressed RAF files. In the latest updates of MacOS Tahoe 26.2, iOS 26 and iPadOS 26 compressed files are supported in Finder/Files and the Photos app. Good news for those of us with Macs and iPads.
×
×
  • Create New...