Jump to content

wedding shoot, recommendation needed for focus settings


shane

Recommended Posts

Hello Shane,

 

A wedding is a very important event, which can't easily be rewound and replayed for a re-shoot if you get the photos wrong. 

 

My advice to you is, if you need to ask such a question, then perhaps it would be better to have the assurance of an experienced wedding photographer present to ensure backup for any mistakes.

 

You don't get a second chance at a wedding, and if you screw up through lack of experience, you are going to disappoint the wedding couple, their family and their friends, and possibly leave yourself open to a lawsuit.

 

In a church (down the aisle), a telephoto is not ideal.  You need 21mm or 28mm to allow for low light, and the depth of field and surroundings to give the photo some context.  You don't want to blur the background in the church, you want to include it.

 

Really, think very carefully about covering the wedding until you've followed experienced wedding photographers enough to understand what is expected, and to have enough experience not to screw up.  It's a BIG responsability :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Shane,

 

A wedding is a very important event, which can't easily be rewound and replayed for a re-shoot if you get the photos wrong. 

 

My advice to you is, if you need to ask such a question, then perhaps it would be better to have the assurance of an experienced wedding photographer present to ensure backup for any mistakes.

 

You don't get a second chance at a wedding, and if you screw up through lack of experience, you are going to disappoint the wedding couple, their family and their friends, and possibly leave yourself open to a lawsuit.

 

In a church (down the aisle), a telephoto is not ideal.  You need 21mm or 28mm to allow for low light, and the depth of field and surroundings to give the photo some context.  You don't want to blur the background in the church, you want to include it.

 

Really, think very carefully about covering the wedding until you've followed experienced wedding photographers enough to understand what is expected, and to have enough experience not to screw up.  It's a BIG responsability :)

AGREED!  That is unless you know the couple and they've ASKED you to do the photography.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

gentlemen,

Thanks for the advise regarding shooting a wedding, I do understand the stakes. Thy are clear, that they want me to do this. I do commercial work, and have shot fashion and event, so can perform when needed. I was just hoping for advice on the best focus options, my success rate with focus tracking is not impressive. I do better with back button focus, and manual focus.

regards

Shane

Link to post
Share on other sites

To answer what I think Shane was getting at...So far I've preferred AF-S with the low burst.  I've tried the continuous focusing mode but it was a little hit and miss.  I've only shot a couple of processionals with the fuji set up, but in decent light single focus worked fine for me.  I usually have two bodies on me...18mm and 35mm...or 23mm and 56mm...just depends a little on the venue.  I know with the AF-C focusing mode it's best to keep it to the 9 AF points in the center and do either the low or high burst mode.  The last one I shot with a x100t in AF-C and the x-t1 with the 35mm on AF-S.

 

I wasn't super familiar with the x100t and found it best to set everything manual on it.  For me when it was in Aperture priority or auto ISO, it made odd choices.  It did fine in AF-C and low burst in good light.  The XT1 did great as well.

 

I've shot on Nikon and Canon...while Nikon has the better AF speed and accuracy overall, I feel like the fuji does just as good as when I was shooting on the Canon 5d MarkIII.  Have fun, try to anticipate what's going to happen next, and have a lot of extra batteries.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just hoping for advice on the best focus options, my success rate with focus tracking is not impressive. I do better with back button focus, and manual focus.

Have you tried AF-C + zone 9 + Cl? This usually works great for me with such slow motion like aisle walking.

 

Back in manual focus days we were shooting with prefocus. Focus peak assist and continuous drive revive this technique for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

gentlemen,

Thanks for the advise regarding shooting a wedding, I do understand the stakes. Thy are clear, that they want me to do this. I do commercial work, and have shot fashion and event, so can perform when needed. I was just hoping for advice on the best focus options, my success rate with focus tracking is not impressive. I do better with back button focus, and manual focus.

regards

Shane

I have the same type of concern. My plan is the 16-55 mm 2.8 with a mono-pod. My thought is a zoom will allow me to recompose faster than a prime lens as who ever is walking the isle gets closer to camera position. The one thing I am thinking is to get focus confirmation. On the back of the XT-1 their is a light that occasional blinks. It is for both the SD card recording and a Warning that the exposure is a problem. In short I know if it is blinking green on the back of the camera I need to change exposure or re-focus, something is wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey  newbie,

forget the zoom and monopod. you need a fast prime like the 35 1.4 or the 56 1.2 and zoom with your feet. I did testing, and it focused better when i walked backwards with the bride and groom. In the rehearsal I got to do testing in actual conditions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • It is really easy to find out if the wifi is on. Your computer or tablet or cell phone will have a network settings dealing with wifi, bluetooth, ethernet or “other”. Open that up and go into the section for wifi, and take note of which networks are listed. Turn on the camera and keep watching the list of networks. If your camera’s wifi is turned on, a new network should suddenly show up in your computer/tablet/phone’s network listings. Now go into the camera’s menus and start a wireless connection (the x-app or camera remote app can help you with this). You should see a network show up now. It is not hidden because it has to be visible so that your computer/tablet/phone can join the camera’s network to transfer images. Turn the camera off and that network should disappear. Turn the camera back on and see what happens.
    • Sweet Creek Falls, Oregon. X-H1, Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Acros.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I think my Fuji 150-600 F8 is a brilliant wildlife lens in terms of sharpness, portability and value but the small aperture does cause issues at the start and end of the day - even pushing the ISO as far as I dare, I can see shutter speed down to 1/25s - stabilisation isn't an issue but asking a deer to stand still for that is too much! In the same situation, an F4 would give 1/100s so the difference to the success rate would be phenomenal... and that's without the other improvements like shallower depth of field. I also find that the Fuji's subject detect AF gets pretty iffy in low light - I keep updating to the latest firmware but it doesn't seem to get any better. I was originally looking at the Nikon 500mm F4 E but good examples secondhand are still reasonably expensive but like-for-like Sigma lenses are around half the price. Reviews I have read suggest that they are as good optically, AF performance and IS-wise but you gain a few hundred grams of weight (but less than the older Nikon model). For a couple of grand, I can live with that. Does anyone have any experience mounting one on an XH2S? What about with the 1.4 teleconverter? It feels like that is pushing it anyway - hefty lens + TC + Fringer all sounds a bit...wobbly? It is on the Fringer approved list but I am wary about AF speed in particular. I had also considered looking for a used Nikon 400mm F2.8, which would be even faster (and heavier) and could couple with a TC to give 560mm F4 but again, it is that lens+TC+Fringer combination that worries me as being just too many links in the chain. Of course, what I really want is a native Fuji prime but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon - and if you look at what Nikon and Sony are doing, if Fuji do ever bring out a 500mm prime, it will probably be a small, light and cheapish F5.6, which is only 2/3 stop better than my zoom at the same focal length. Any thoughts anyone?
    • The Amazon link is an annoying feature of this forum - its automatic and is applied to every post for advertising purposes. My question was - how do you know the camera wi-fi is on and requires turning off? I would have thought this would just use up the battery for no purpose if you aren't specifically using a function that requires wi-fi.
    • I've made a point to push Angelbird memory products as they are the best performance cards you can get, The sustained write speed is important.
×
×
  • Create New...