Jump to content

Which 56mm?

kielinski

By kielinski
in Fuji X Lenses

 Share

Recommended Posts

kielinski Explorer

kielinski

Posted
Posted

I stopped in to my local camera shop to actually handle these lenses.  Both felt great and were of sturdy construction.  After reading online reviews I'm finding it difficult to justify buying the APD over the regular lens.

 

APD Pros:

Smoother bokeh

Maybe slightly more contrast

 

APD Cons:

About 1 stop less light transmission (could be a problem in low light conditions)

Considerably more expensive

 

Anyone have any thoughts/opinions?

Link to post
Share on other sites
mjh Enthusiast

mjh

Posted
Posted

An argument in favour of the non-APD version would be its support for phase-detection AF. It all boils down to the question whether an extremely pleasant bokeh is of paramount importance to you. If it is then by all means go for the APD. Otherwise the normal, non-APD version is the more versatile choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Maurice Community Regular

Maurice

Posted
Posted

Indeed, i have read that too about the phase detect AF. Another Con.

 

That's a lot of Cons for one special effect, you will have something unique that's for sure, but on the other hand some people say it almost looks too artificial -like photoshop blur. :(

 

Also, there are many ways available to DIY by modifying a standard UV filter for example:

 

But .. i do get the appeal of wanting to have that special version of a already fantastic lens. :rolleyes:

Maintaining maximum performance that a DIY hack of course will not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
mjh Enthusiast

mjh

Posted
Posted

Also, there are many ways available to DIY by modifying a standard UV filter for example.

Yeah, but achieving the APD effect – excellent sharpness within the depth of field, combined with a really smooth bokeh both behind and in front of this zone – by any other means is next to impossible.

 

An undercorrected lens (the standard choice for a smooth background bokeh) would also compromise sharpness within the depth of field and the foreground bokeh suffers as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
drb Contributor

drb

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the replies! I'll hem and haw for awhile and probably end up with the APD.

What's the verdict after you have used it?

I'm worried about the slower focus and less light on the APD.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...
gamblor Newbie

gamblor

Posted
Posted

I couldn't find an official 56mm thread so I'll post here.

On Monday I won an auction for the 56mm but unfortunately it wasn't as nice as described and I sent it back. I did get to test it out though. Absolutely beautiful image quality!

My question is, how is the focus ring on everyone's 56? The one I had had a really slippery focus ring and I couldn't even put the lens on the camera without spinning the focus ring and aperture ring inadvertently a few times.

 

Now, I'm just wondering if paying more for a brand new 56mm is worth it, rather than trying to save $100 on a used one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
PatrickB Apprentice

PatrickB

Posted
Posted

I'd get the regular 56mm, which is around €300,00 cheaper at the moment, and spend the difference in a 90mm f2. This would give more compression, smoother bokeh and transitions than a 56mm. 

 

Gamblor, the ring is awkward indeed, I usually grab the end of the lens or the lens hood. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
gamblor Newbie

gamblor

Posted
Posted

Ah ok (re: the ring). Does yours turn super easily then? I'm just wondering if that was just the used one I got. On Fuji vs Fuji he says it's tight.

 

As for which one to get, I'm definitely getting the regular 56mm. I was just wondering whether to pay 90,000 yen for a brand new one or keep looking for a used one in good condition for 75000 to 80,000yen.

 

I'm definitely not interested in the 90mm as 1)my studio is too small and 2) I'd rather get the 50-140

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dis Collaborator

Dis

Posted
Posted

Ah ok (re: the ring). Does yours turn super easily then? I'm just wondering if that was just the used one I got. On Fuji vs Fuji he says it's tight.

Focus ring is quite tight. Nevertheless it doesn't help mounting the lens. One has to grab it by aperture ring in the end position or by the lens front and rear at the same time by one hand. It's not easy but you'll get used to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tom H. Experienced

Tom H.

Posted
Posted

I have the APD. I never used the normal one. The aperture ring is far too loose for my taste, but that is subjective. Some like it that way. Focus ring is nice and smooth. Focus is improved with latest firmware V4 on the X-T1, even if it's not using phase detect AF. Not a lens for fast action though, but I use it for street shooting from time to time and don't have any real issues. It renders in a very pleasing tone, remembers me of my old Canon 135 f2. But better and sharper and without and aberrations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Neil Rosenberg
      Infrared Photography on X-E2 665nm

      By Neil Rosenberg · Posted

      I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Neil Rosenberg
      Infrared

      By Neil Rosenberg · Posted

      In reply to the original question, it all depends on what you mean by infrared.  If you mean "see thermal information", then I agree with the comments here.  However, if you mean near-infrared, the X-T4, or basically any digital camera can be modified to "see" it.  Check out Lifepixel.com and Kolarivision.com for more info. As regards lenses, I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Greybeard
      XS10 and manual lenses

      By Greybeard · Posted

      No - I don’t think so - it means you can take pictures if you remove the lens completely - but I’m not sure that is a problem
    • mcewena
      XS10 and manual lenses

      By mcewena · Posted

      I bought a manual lens over xmas and it took me a while to find the "shutter w/o lens" function in the menu settings.  So far I haven't found a way to either put that on the Q menu or marry that setting to one of the 4 custom modes.   Am I missing something? Is there a problem if I just leave that setting enabled even when the OEM auto lens is in place? tia
    • Greybeard
      Apple Support for Compressed RAF files

      By Greybeard · Posted

      It appears that Apple now (at last!) fully supports FujiFilm Lossless and Compressed RAF files. In the latest updates of MacOS Tahoe 26.2, iOS 26 and iPadOS 26 compressed files are supported in Finder/Files and the Photos app. Good news for those of us with Macs and iPads.
×
×
  • Create New...