Jump to content

Recommended Posts

so, its down to a little more pixels, better autofocus, electronic shutter and more automatic exposure correction, maybe better video but that’s it?

Faster sync speed, HVF I guess, faster mechanical speed, dual SD, sealing. Quite great update over X-Pro1, real update over X-T1. The hard choice will be between X-Pro2 and X-T2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? Unless you have a better crystal ball then mine  :D

That's quite usual situation. A manufacturer makes a camera. Than they wipe out all the bugs and add features users miss via the second generation. The third gen is usually just minor upgrade to up-to-date technologies. That's just statistics. Lot's of examples of different brands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Faster sync speed, HVF I guess, faster mechanical speed, dual SD, sealing. Quite great update over X-Pro1, real update over X-T1. The hard choice will be between X-Pro2 and X-T2.

And a faster processor.  Sounds like a wonderful upgrade.

 

They didn't listen to a bunch of winers (who'll never be happy anyway) and throw everything but the kitchen sink at it.  I love it.  This is, and should remain, a shooters camera.  I hope they keep it this way...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Faster sync speed, HVF I guess, faster mechanical speed, dual SD, sealing. Quite great update over X-Pro1, real update over X-T1. The hard choice will be between X-Pro2 and X-T2.

 

Plus most or all of the refinements of the Fuji X100T and X-T1.  Several weeks ago, I shot an X-Pro1 body again after using the X100S/T and Fuji X-T1 for the last several years.  While using the X-Pro1, it felt outdated but not in a bad way--just the realization that Fujiflim has come a long way since 2011.  I imagine the X-Pro2 will be stellar so I'm not worried about functionality and performance.  

 

The big question for me is the sensor performance.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really disappointed that there will be no Tilt Screen. Actually, I do not really care about the Pro2. But I guess it also means that the E3, if there will be one, will also have none.

 

When I bought my T1 I was not very excited about the Tilt Screen. But I soon found out how usefull it is in many situations. In fact, I think it helps creativity as it is easier to use unusual points of view.

 

So when I want to participate in the hopefully faster autofocus and higher ISO of the next generation I will be forced to buy another fake DSLR, and I really really hate fake designs. Not even the highly appreciated ISO dial can compensate that.

 

Looks to me that nowadays design has highest priority. The Pro despite its name is not the camera to give professionals a tool with all the best ingrediences from the Fuji stock. It is designed to look like an old fashioned Leica made for old men to make the dreams from their youth come true. And the more versatile T1 needs to look like a DSLR because that's how serious cameras look.

 

But probably I am just a grumpy old man who is disappointed that his current dream, an E3 with ISO dial, Tilt Screen, and high ISO performance like the Sony A7s II, will not come true

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, at least for the time being, the rumors that I am hearing don't sound, to me, very exciting.

 

Not enough,anyway, to make me want to desire any upgrade. So I guess, I’ll wait and keep on enjoying what I have, which, realistically is way more than what I need.

 

I will urge myself and others to ponder on the eternal question whether to have is an addition to to be let alone an alternative.

 

Acquiring yet again another black fuji box containing a generation 2 will not change much in what most people are  or do with what they already have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ShutterNot:While there's life, there's hope

But I agree, like often, with milandro that whatever Fuji may pull from their hat, it will not make me a better photographer....but some things are just soo nice to have and a few more ISO stops with an autofocus that can keep track with the ISO would be helpful when I shoot at a blues concert or a party.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed - it will not make one a better photographer, but much faster and more accurate focus would be great to have along with all the other improvements.

 

You can rationalize all you want with respect to not improving your skills, but there are many improvements that can make photography more enjoyable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

X-Pro2: SEE the FIRST IMAGES taken with Fujifilm X-Pro2, documenting The Day After the Terror Attacks in Paris!

 

at fujirumros here: http://www.fujirumors.com/see-the-first-images-taken-with-fujifilm-x-pro2-documenting-the-day-after-the-terror-attacks-in-paris/

Ahh was hoping for larger image, doesn't look all that different and the highlights look pretty much the same as current Fuji cameras.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really disappointed that there will be no Tilt Screen.

I had own a bridge Fuji camera, HS50, dirt cheap against any X-camera, and it's screen can be tilted, flipped, rotated, whatever... They call it "vary-angle". Very handy and helps for creativity.

Don't understand why such great and existing feature isn't goes to the top models, unless marketers are kept it as "last chance" for last runs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose this has a lot to do with the retro look of the camera. I am quite sure this was an imput from the marketing department to the designers.

 

I am sure that the monetary saving is marginal at best but the look of the X pro would seriously put some of its potential buyers off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...