Jump to content

Travel lenses


Jonny Cigar

Recommended Posts

Let's just say that I want to travel light and with a max of two lenses. I currently own a 16mm f1.4 and a 35mm f.2 and would like to take street photographs, cultural events, portraits. I would like to experiment some astrophotography and landscapes.  

...but after trying the 16mm for a while I founded very wide and with lots of distortion due the wide angle. It's got some amazing reviews but maybe its just not the way I look at things. So I am tempted to sell the 16mm and get either a 23mm f.2 or 18-55 (apparently amazing kit lens) f2.8-4.

So my travel kit would be a 23mm and 35mm f2 or 18-55mm and 35mm.  what would be the best combo? Or should I just keep my 16mm? 

any suggestion would be appreciated 

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have both the 23 and 35 f/2 lens, and while I like them both, for travel, I don't think there is enough difference to make these your only 2 lens. For travel, I find my 18-135 to be the most flexible/useable lens for whatever situation you find yourself in. The 18-135 is weather sealed and IOS, adding to the versatility whenever you are out and about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, cug said:

If 16mm isn't your cup of tea, but primes are what you want to use, maybe selling both and getting 23/2 and 50/2 will get you what you want?

And add 27/2.8 in between. I think anyone who love 35mm FL as I do would love 27mm as well. Just give it a chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My overseas travel set is the 18-55/f2.8-4 and 10-24/f4.  In the past, I have found that I took very few pictures at focal lengths greater than 70-85mm (full frame equivalent) so this set works nicely.  I could reduce the size and weight by substituting my 14/2.8 for the 10-24, but I prefer zooms when being a tourist at busy attractions.  Sometimes I cannot frame the image the way that I want by moving to a better location in crowded places.  For travel to places to view wildlife, I add the 55-200.

My wife and I love to travel and either walk a lot or take public transportation to experience the local flavor, so lightweight Fuji gear is wonderful.  While I have a full set of Fuji f2 primes, I prefer zooms when traveling.  To me, zooms are my friends in these situations for not only the above reason but also to minimize lens changing.  My experience is that I would miss opportunities and increase the possibility of sensor dust (which has happened to me during travel) with primes.  The quality of these 3 Fuji zooms is such that I don't worry about a smidgen more IQ that primes might give.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too much noise is made about lenses that "do it all" at the expense of what you're comfortable with. When I'm traveling in new places with new scenery, I don't want to be adjusting to focal lengths that feel unnatural and new to me. That's a recipe for bad photographs, even if a new lens will technically allow you to do "more." I'm most comfortable with my 23mm and 35mm f/1.4 lenses, so that's what I bring when I travel. Depending on where I'm going I may bring my 55-200mm or my 56mm for the remaining 5% of shots depending on where I'm going, but my top 2 lenses are always what I'm most comfortable shooting with and I only adjust my kit if I feel that it merits bringing a third lens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Not sure what your current ILC body is, but if you want to go really light and find that the 16mm is too wide, then how about picking up used X100 series camera for the trip?  It would suit your needs specified, including environmental portraiture (which you likely want in a vacation) and you could likely sell it for the same amount when you return if budget is an issue. 

Usability would be very similar to your current X series body, but I would still get it a few weeks before leaving to ensure you are fully up to speed with all the functions and setup. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • It is really easy to find out if the wifi is on. Your computer or tablet or cell phone will have a network settings dealing with wifi, bluetooth, ethernet or “other”. Open that up and go into the section for wifi, and take note of which networks are listed. Turn on the camera and keep watching the list of networks. If your camera’s wifi is turned on, a new network should suddenly show up in your computer/tablet/phone’s network listings. Now go into the camera’s menus and start a wireless connection (the x-app or camera remote app can help you with this). You should see a network show up now. It is not hidden because it has to be visible so that your computer/tablet/phone can join the camera’s network to transfer images. Turn the camera off and that network should disappear. Turn the camera back on and see what happens.
    • Sweet Creek Falls, Oregon. X-H1, Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Acros.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I think my Fuji 150-600 F8 is a brilliant wildlife lens in terms of sharpness, portability and value but the small aperture does cause issues at the start and end of the day - even pushing the ISO as far as I dare, I can see shutter speed down to 1/25s - stabilisation isn't an issue but asking a deer to stand still for that is too much! In the same situation, an F4 would give 1/100s so the difference to the success rate would be phenomenal... and that's without the other improvements like shallower depth of field. I also find that the Fuji's subject detect AF gets pretty iffy in low light - I keep updating to the latest firmware but it doesn't seem to get any better. I was originally looking at the Nikon 500mm F4 E but good examples secondhand are still reasonably expensive but like-for-like Sigma lenses are around half the price. Reviews I have read suggest that they are as good optically, AF performance and IS-wise but you gain a few hundred grams of weight (but less than the older Nikon model). For a couple of grand, I can live with that. Does anyone have any experience mounting one on an XH2S? What about with the 1.4 teleconverter? It feels like that is pushing it anyway - hefty lens + TC + Fringer all sounds a bit...wobbly? It is on the Fringer approved list but I am wary about AF speed in particular. I had also considered looking for a used Nikon 400mm F2.8, which would be even faster (and heavier) and could couple with a TC to give 560mm F4 but again, it is that lens+TC+Fringer combination that worries me as being just too many links in the chain. Of course, what I really want is a native Fuji prime but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon - and if you look at what Nikon and Sony are doing, if Fuji do ever bring out a 500mm prime, it will probably be a small, light and cheapish F5.6, which is only 2/3 stop better than my zoom at the same focal length. Any thoughts anyone?
    • The Amazon link is an annoying feature of this forum - its automatic and is applied to every post for advertising purposes. My question was - how do you know the camera wi-fi is on and requires turning off? I would have thought this would just use up the battery for no purpose if you aren't specifically using a function that requires wi-fi.
    • I've made a point to push Angelbird memory products as they are the best performance cards you can get, The sustained write speed is important.
×
×
  • Create New...