Jump to content

Which Fuji X cameras do you use?  

816 members have voted

  1. 1. Which Fuji X cameras do you use?

    • Fuji X-Pro1
      147
    • Fuji X-Pro2
      96
    • Fuji X-T1
      411
    • Fuji X-T10
      110
    • Fuji X-E1
      105
    • Fuji X-E2
      179
    • Fuji X-E2s
      14
    • Fuji X-A1
      17
    • Fuji X-A2
      3
    • Fuji X-M1
      32
    • Fuji X100
      49
    • Fuji X100s
      87
    • Fuji X100t
      105
    • Fuji X70
      12
    • Fuji X10 / X20 / X30
      60
    • Fuji X-S1
      15
    • Fuji XF1
      7
    • Fuji XQ1/XQ2
      10

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

I am thrilled to have just bought an XPro1 about 3 months ago! I love this camera with the 35 f1.4... I bought this just as the ne 35mm lens came out, and well.... The new XPro2. That's ok, I am thrilled with the way that it handles, and the image quality simply blows me away! I know I will want another camera down the road, X T2 possibly, but these lenses will follow me to the end of my days. Now to put an X100s or t in my arsenal!

 

Great forum by the way! This is my. First post, I think.

 

Monty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all from Devon, UK. I've the X100s, but am considering a brother for it in the shape of the X30 !. These have come down in price by almost 50%.

The X30 is fantastic. I saw a couple of B&W pics of an LA Fire department briefing a few months ago. I was convinced it was taken with a full format camera and T Max 100. Turns out they were taken with an X30 using the monochrome/red filter setting. I bought one immediately. In the US you can buy one from Digital Rev for $400. You may be able to get the same price in Britain. A fantastic camera with absurd super macro: 1:1 at one centimeter from your subject. Get one, you won't regret it. Resolution is pretty amazing. It's my go to camera if I want something light.

Link to post
Share on other sites

XT1 and XPro 1.

Don't actually use the XPro1 much as I find it non responsive enough and the focusing is still slow for the work I do. I did enjoy it thou but also miss many pictures with it. Not as many as I have missed with the X100 when I had one, my first Fuji. The Xt1 is not bad when it comes to focus fast and accurately but is not enough.

So I am waiting for the XPro2. Unfortunately Fuji Taiwan (where I live) is not very proactive when it comes to promote their product among us professional. So I am waiting to have a chance to text it properly first. This time I won't buy it without having the opportunity to test it for several days if I can. 

I have the 28mm, the 35mm F1.4, the 56mm 1.2 and the fantastic 50~140 f 2.8 and the 10~24mm  f 4. I want to buy the teleconverter and the 16 f 1.4. All good lenses and now I need a body that respond fast and focuses even faster because I really wish I can do without my DSLR all together. Different cameras yes but I believe one day will be possible   for me to use only mirrorless for my work. Right now it is still impossible. Yet I took many really nice pictures with my Fuji that could have not been taken with a DSLR (too big, intrusive and noisy (shutter noise wise I mean)

I do dream of a Fuji like mirrorless camera full frame as responsive in everything as the DSLR........but I suppose this won't happen in the near future. Honestly I could do with APS C sensor if I had more pixels. Now with the X Pro 2 at 24 megapixel my prints could look better but there are already over 40 megapixels cameras out there so I won't say 24 megapixels...WOW!!!. I work for a magazine and designers crop images all the time (I hate it). I have read several enthusiastic reviews on the XPro2 but I really want to see myself what it does and doesn't first.

Said all that I still love the Fuji X quality of images.......just want it faster, faster and faster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the XE2 and X PRO1....love the XE2 especially after the update..I haven't had the XPRO1 long and I must say,I'm not entirely in love with it..It is second hand to me but was only bought last summer from the last owner.

I would be willing to swap it for a X30..anyone interested please contact me.Only thing is I cannot get it to the uk until 12th March,that's because my o/h goes back to here sons on that date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...