Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Adam :-)

I've been reading your story for a couple of weeks. I have always been intrigued by the X-Pro1, and also about the old XF 35. So on eBay, I found a used set containing an X-Pro1 with that lens and an XF 18. Your tips about the X-Pro1 are very useful, and your writing is inspiring. I very rarely cared much for the OVF on my X-100T, but I will give it a go with the XF 18 and zone focusing.

Thanks :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also a fan of your blog. And for my style of photography (and as an amateur), the X-Pro1 is still a very fine camera, when combined with the 18mm or 35mm lenses. I actually look forward to the future 23mm F/2 lens.

 

The X-Pro2 may be a tempting camera, but not at the price it's sold for here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Thanks to Adam's series I purchased another XPro1 for a couple of hundred quid, used, here in the U.K.  It was immaculate. Sure, it is slower to focus than my new Fujis but so what? The images it produces are just so lovely.

 

Thanks for taking the time to post that Drew, I really felt that the inaugural X ILC camera was worthy of some in-depth descriptive love, and the response I've had from the community has been very positive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I bought the Xpro1 almost 5 months ago and although there are some things I have issues with (mainly continues AF), there is nothing wrong with this sensor.

It is terrific! Produce beautiful images.

I would buy an x-t2 even if it had the x-trans I sensor

 

It doesn't really do continuous AF in the normal sense of the word (which tends to mean tracking), it literally just continuously runs the AF motor! :)

 

But you're 100% correct - the IQ is peachy :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

One issue I have with the X-Pro1 which I understand is not the issue with Fujifilm later releases is that I have to chose whether I want to be able to change shutterspeed or exposure.

 

If I put the shutterspeed on Auto I can change the exposurewith the exp.dial but if I select a shutterspeed manually the exposure dial will have no effect when turning it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One issue I have with the X-Pro1 which I understand is not the issue with Fujifilm later releases is that I have to chose whether I want to be able to change shutterspeed or exposure.

 

If I put the shutterspeed on Auto I can change the exposurewith the exp.dial but if I select a shutterspeed manually the exposure dial will have no effect when turning it.

 

I believe in the later cameras you can control ISO with the EV dial.

 

Do you shoot full manual or SS priority?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe in the later cameras you can control ISO with the EV dial.

 

Do you shoot full manual or SS priority?

You mean I can program the EV dial to increase/reduce iso instead of exp?

Manually, I manually select aperture and shutterspeed, but I have ISO on AUTO

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean I can program the EV dial to increase/reduce iso instead of exp?

Manually, I manually select aperture and shutterspeed, but I have ISO on AUTO

No, not exactly

 

The EV dial is basically a manual override for something the camera is controlling.

 

So for example in AE mode, it'll change the shutter.

 

I just tried with my XP2

 

In auto ISO, auto aperture but manual shutter mode, the EV dial changed the iso (which surprised me actually, I was expecting aperture)

 

In manual ISO manual SS, auto aperture mode, the EV dial changed the aperture.

 

I'm not sure if on the XP1 the EV dial can change the aperture (in shutter priority mode) but I'm pretty sure, that the XP1 can't change the ISO with the EV dial (iirc this was a feature that first came in on the XT1 but I might be mistaken)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The EV dial only works when shutter speed is set to A on the X-Pro1. To control exposure with a fixed shutter speed requires setting iso manually, personally I have ISO assigned to the Fn button to do this.

 

But yeah, this feature was added in firmware 4.0 to the X-E2 etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...