Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have just bought a second but near mint x-e1 which I have paired with vintage lens. I am using a canon fd 50mm, and a Takumar 55mm and have found the images to be soft.

 

I have also used a 35mm Fujian and the images are sharper.

 

I think I am using the camera wrong. I have updated to the latest firmware and can see the focus peaking. In the evf the image is sharp but when I half press the shutter release the image seems to get softer and I refocus, I also use the ring button to magnify the subject and refocus but I am getting soft images. 

 

Is this the property of the lens I have? or the as I suspect the way I am using the x-system. Your guidance would be much appreciated.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Half pressing the shutter suggests you would like the lens to autofocus. I am assuming your vintage lenses do not support this. Manual focus only using focus peaking is the only way with these lenses I assume. No point in half pressing the the shutter I guess

 

best 

Ronald

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not see anything similar with my x-e1 and a Nikon AF 85\1.8 and a Novoflex adapter..

You could check if you can get a better focus if you put your camera on a tripod and do a kind of focus bracketing. Focus according to the focus assitant, take an image and then turn the focus ring a little bit in one direction, take another image and finally turn the ring in the other direction a little bit over the first position take athird image. If the first image is the sharpest than the remaining softness comes from the lens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@zuluviper

I played a little with the manual focus. At one point I also felt that the EVF gets soft when I press the release button half way. But when I looked carefully I noticed that just the focus peaking goes off. I had high lighted straight edges which pretended sharpness. This is about the same what happens when you do an unsharp masking in Photo Shop.

Are you sure this is not what you have seen?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Focus peaking is turned off by the half-press. Just shoot. Legacy glass designed for film cameras can be a disaster depending upon the design of the lens. I have two Canon Serenars of considerable age, both with flat rear elements. Film is matte, but sensors are shiny, so the light bounces back and forth between them, destroying contrast.

 

Many very fast vintage lenses are notoriously soft wide open. They were designed to help focus SLR film cameras in low-light and could be used wide-open in an emergency but at considerable cost in sharpness. Working for a morning paper, much of my work was in available darkness. The classic f/1.2 58mm Nikkor helped a lot, but I tried to keep it at a minimum of f/2.0-2.8 for the actual exposure. At the time, Nikon made the f/1.2 Noct-Nikkor, which was optimized for widest aperture shooting, but at the price I could not convince my boss that it would provide enough return on investment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Larry had very good truthful comments.  Like finally saying the Emperor is wearing no pants, it's not "fashionable" to say a bit of vintage glass is not sharp wide open, yet as Larry knows and others + myself, it be fact.

 

There is a romantic "draw" to an extent to play with old adapted glass in this manner. For me, it works best to take some "potshots" with the adapted glass for fun, but if the subject matter is something I cannot return to easily or re-create, TAKE SOME PICS WITH A REAL FUJI LENS before you vacate the scene.... that way you come home with something on your card in focus.

 

Once in awhile the adapted vintage glass will nail something or have it's own "soft focus" that comes out rather desirable too.

 

Great post/topic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can find great lenses to be shot manually and giving you both sharpness where needed and “ bokeh” too

 

Please, look at this portrait in this thread on adapted lenses and their rendering.

 

post-106-0-96881500-1459148480.jpg

 

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/2599-new-bokeh-monsters-or-classic-cheap-adapted-glass/?do=findComment&comment=24193

 

This portrait was taken with a X-E2 with an adapted 50mm 1.8 at 2.8.

 

Personally I don’t find anything wrong with this lens used this way.

 

Of course I wouldn’t use this lens always and for everything because it would be foolish to do so.

 

I use a combination of X lenses , manual modern lenses, adapted classic lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a quick shot with my Pentax SMC Takumar 3.5/35mm to show the rendering of the Pentax lens coating (and probably aging).

 

41744958.764391be.1024.jpg
 

Don't set the WB to Auto, of course, when you want to show the character of old glass. But in my opinion, the uniqueness of vintage lenses is one of the attractions.

 

As another example, here's the same car (but with a bit cloudier sky) shot with my Pentax SMC Takumar 200/4.

 

41745038.45741e2b.1024.jpg

 

As a comparison, here is approximately the same scene, shot with the Fuji XC 50-230. It is clear that this is the sharper lens, with most contrast. But is that always the most important feature of a lens?

 

41745270.504f614e.1024.jpg
 

Edit: SOOC JPEG, film simulation Std, other settings on neutral, besides sharpness (+1).

Edited by johant
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...