Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm on Adobe CC Photography program (photoshop+lightroom $10/month) and they came out with an update just before I received my pre-ordered X-T10. 

 

It sucks how Adobe holds you hostage when you buy a new camera, forcing you to make a big upgrade just to get camera support when they could so clearly backport the camera support only if they wanted to. IMHO it's a reason to just bite the bullet and get the CC plan because that way you don't have to think about it, but it's also pretty expensive. 

 

At the same time most of the competitive options are just as expensive. You pay $10/month for Capture 1 too, but that doesn't come with Photoshop!

 

You could always try Darktable, the open source equivalent, though I haven't used it and YMMV:

http://www.darktable.org/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I am using the CC Lightrooom, and only signed up to it a couple of days ago, but absolutely cannot get it to recognise my RAF files. It sounds from some of the replies above that this should not be a problem for me as I imagine what I am using is the very latest version of Lightroom. I'm also finding it very hard to find any way of contacting Adobe.

 

Does anyone know how to solve this please?

 

BP

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just use the Free(!!!) Adobe DNG convertor. Google is your friend.

Convert the RAW files to DNG and off you go.

My T2 isn't recognised by LR5 so this is what I do. Adds an extra step in the processing but isn't too onerous or time consuming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...