Jump to content

"black block" in middle of random files in Lightroom?


Recommended Posts

Hello all! 

I've recently added a Fujifilm 50Sii to my arsenal and am experiencing this odd phenomena that I haven't been able to find anything about online. I'm using Lr Classic 13.5 on a 2020 MacBook pro. Once importing from the memory card is done (or as it is populating really) random images will have a large black box down the middle of the image (see attached screenshots, the third image is the same file opened in Develop via crop function) in the Library's smaller previews, on the larger selection, and in usually in Develop mode. Sometimes when I move to Develop the box goes away and stays away. Sometimes it does not go away, and sometimes it goes away but then reappears when I switch back Library.  

 

Most of the time I can delete the files and reimport, but I'm having to do this several times to ultimately "get" all the files from a shoot. What is going on? Is this an issue with Lr?  Is it an issue with my graphics card? Should I not be using smart previews, or is it something else? This only happens to maybe 5% of the images, but it's a real pain... 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happens if you use the Finder or Image Capture to move the images from the card over to the drive?

Both of these should show you image previews for files on the card, the finder should show you file previews for images on the drive as well. The thumbnails can take a minute or five to generate depending on how many files are on the card.

It could be that there are so many large files that LR is having a hard time generating previews as you are scrolling around that it cannot keep up and you see the black background instead of the image thumbnail.

The next time it happens, use the Finder to go into the library where the files are stored and see if the Finder will let you take a look at the image. If the image is complete, then your image is safe, but may require fiddling with LR to get it displayed.

A lot of apps use Apple’s built-in operating system procedure to generate their thumbnail previews, rather than make them theirselves. If the os gets bogged down trying to generate a lot of thumbnails for large files, the app bogs down in displaying them. And GFX files are large.

p.s. Welcome to the forum.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Jerry! 

 Sorry I let this topic slide because the few files I couldn't recover were dogs anyway. However, I took the Fuji out for a spin today on a very important shoot and the Black Bar of Death is back and worse than ever! I can view them in Finder and open in Adobe Camera Raw, but that is such a pain to do with each one... 

Before the bar would go away usually when I'd open in Develop mode but now that isn't even working. As it stands now I can only view/edit 5 out of 32 images! WTF? 

Is this a LrC issue with Fujifilm RAF?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do wish I had an easy answer for you. Based upon what you are describing, it does sound like Lightroom is using the operating system procedures to generate previews/views rather than doing it on its own.

It gets worse because normally the operating system really only does that on a temporary basis so that its own database of thumbnails does not get too large — say you have a folder of several hundred images, every time you open it, the Finder regenerates new thumbnails for those images because it is easier and takes less space than storing the thumbnails for multiple folders each holding several hundred images; saving that many would really bog things down. Programs that rely on using the operating system to get the previews/views are supposed to store the results they get as needed.

Try turning off everything else you can that is running in the background such as mail apps, messaging apps, etc., anything you can turn off, do so. This allows the operating system to devote its resources (speed and memory) to your previews/views.

It does sound like your data is safe, which is great news. Writing a letter or two to Adobe may get you a better response, but it could also end up with someone telling you to get a newer machine with more memory and drive space.

Edit: You may have some better results from putting only a few images in a folder — split the group into several / many folders and open them that way. It will take longer to go through the entire group but smaller sets puts less strain on the operating system.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • It is really easy to find out if the wifi is on. Your computer or tablet or cell phone will have a network settings dealing with wifi, bluetooth, ethernet or “other”. Open that up and go into the section for wifi, and take note of which networks are listed. Turn on the camera and keep watching the list of networks. If your camera’s wifi is turned on, a new network should suddenly show up in your computer/tablet/phone’s network listings. Now go into the camera’s menus and start a wireless connection (the x-app or camera remote app can help you with this). You should see a network show up now. It is not hidden because it has to be visible so that your computer/tablet/phone can join the camera’s network to transfer images. Turn the camera off and that network should disappear. Turn the camera back on and see what happens.
    • Sweet Creek Falls, Oregon. X-H1, Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Acros.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I think my Fuji 150-600 F8 is a brilliant wildlife lens in terms of sharpness, portability and value but the small aperture does cause issues at the start and end of the day - even pushing the ISO as far as I dare, I can see shutter speed down to 1/25s - stabilisation isn't an issue but asking a deer to stand still for that is too much! In the same situation, an F4 would give 1/100s so the difference to the success rate would be phenomenal... and that's without the other improvements like shallower depth of field. I also find that the Fuji's subject detect AF gets pretty iffy in low light - I keep updating to the latest firmware but it doesn't seem to get any better. I was originally looking at the Nikon 500mm F4 E but good examples secondhand are still reasonably expensive but like-for-like Sigma lenses are around half the price. Reviews I have read suggest that they are as good optically, AF performance and IS-wise but you gain a few hundred grams of weight (but less than the older Nikon model). For a couple of grand, I can live with that. Does anyone have any experience mounting one on an XH2S? What about with the 1.4 teleconverter? It feels like that is pushing it anyway - hefty lens + TC + Fringer all sounds a bit...wobbly? It is on the Fringer approved list but I am wary about AF speed in particular. I had also considered looking for a used Nikon 400mm F2.8, which would be even faster (and heavier) and could couple with a TC to give 560mm F4 but again, it is that lens+TC+Fringer combination that worries me as being just too many links in the chain. Of course, what I really want is a native Fuji prime but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon - and if you look at what Nikon and Sony are doing, if Fuji do ever bring out a 500mm prime, it will probably be a small, light and cheapish F5.6, which is only 2/3 stop better than my zoom at the same focal length. Any thoughts anyone?
    • The Amazon link is an annoying feature of this forum - its automatic and is applied to every post for advertising purposes. My question was - how do you know the camera wi-fi is on and requires turning off? I would have thought this would just use up the battery for no purpose if you aren't specifically using a function that requires wi-fi.
    • I've made a point to push Angelbird memory products as they are the best performance cards you can get, The sustained write speed is important.
×
×
  • Create New...