Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi ~ Hello everyone!
 
I am from Taipei, Taiwan, I took this photo
 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 
Is in Taiwan Kinmen County to participate in a photography competition, won the finalists in the competition group, but also in the network popular award list, if you agree with the photos look good, beautiful, enough level, trouble to facebook search this photo to help by praise Thank you!
 
The polling time is until 10:00 on October 13, 2017
 
Use Fujifilm X-T2 + Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR to shoot
 
Destination URL:
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Graphically, the bottom half of the image is not uninteresting. There's some kind of pattern with triangles - the flag, the shadow on the ground beneath it and the triangle formed by the extended arm of the sunlit man in front, and going down, the back of the silhouette continued by the shadow on the ground. There's also the adjacent black triangle formed by the roof shadow, whose upper side goes top left.

 

I like how the dark silhouette of the man and white markings on his shirt echo the black flag as well. The colors are interesting, adding vividness to the scene.

 

Other than that, I agree that it's not obvious what the image is really about, and the top half is little more than your typical holiday snapshot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with Hermelin.  It does look like a random snapshot without any thought to composition, framing, or subject matter. If it's intended as street, I also see no decisive nor interesting moment.  The stone arch looks like it would be interesting in person, as would the two tattooed characters.  But a photo of interesting subjects does not necessarily make an interesting photo.

 

Random snapshots can be fun and have lots of personal value to the photographer.  But that doesn't mean they have to mean anything to the rest of us.  For me, one of the most challenging aspects of learning photography was/is learning the difference between photos that have a personal, sentimental value and photos that have value to unbiased, neutral viewers.

 

Harry-angel, by going after Hermelin's photos you might be getting a little too defensive.  Criticism is OK, especially when people are directly asking for it (OP: "Do you think the photos are nice?" Hermelin: "No.").  There was nothing rude or mean about Hermelin's response.  Not everyone needs hand-holding or coddling.

Just my two cents.  Not trying to rant or offend, just stating my own opinion.  Feel free to disagree.

Edited by kimballistic
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree too. There’s some interesting stuff happening, and some interesting-looking people, and there’s a photogenic arch in the background. In the right hands, the scene might have made a good photo.

A moment earlier, or a moment later, and the opening of the arch might have acted as a frame-within-a-frame to isolate one or more of the figures - especially if the photographer had taken a step or two to the right so that the camera was pointing directly forwards rather than angled to the right.

A step back, and the whole of the arch could have been in shot, without the incomplete edges and without the sloping edges and figures cut off at the knee caused by the upward tilt of the camera.

A page or two forwards and we could have a closer crop on the scene, with the stonework filling the frame and closer waist-up shots of the figures.

However, this is just a snapshot.

I see no skill or composition in it.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Warwick
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Hermelin,

No offense meant but did you ever have a critical look at your own photos....?

I’m sorry, but I’d say that is is exactly what you’re doing yourself: you point the camera at random street “scenes” and post them here. I don’t see big stories in your pictures either.

I'm sorry but I disagree. There's a big difference between the shot in this thread and my shots. I wouldn't even bother taking a shot like this. This picture is all over the place and my eyes don't know what to look at.

 My photos aren't perfect but at least there is a clear subject in them. But this thread wasn't about my photography... This guy asked an opinion and I gave my honest opinon. I don't remember asking you about your opinion on my photos however.

Edited by Hermelin
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...