Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My findings:

 

Tested with 35mm 1.4 @ 1.4

 

AFC works! It never worked for me before the update. Even for relatively static subjects. But now its great! Way more accurate. I can finally use AFC.

 

Eye detection didn't work so well. But my lounge is dimly lit so that could be why.

 

Overall it seems faster! I took a whole bunch of pics and they seemed to write to the card faster?? Usually my camera would blink for ages if I did that. Also reviewing pictures seems to be a bit faster.

 

The new zone af feature is nifty. Works well. I prefer the accuracy of the single af point though.

 

Overall awesome update. More testing for me now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit by FX Admin:

 

Sorry, I had to delete this link - for several reasons:

  • We don't know this software - can be a virus too
  • If it's Fuji firmware, we don't know what status it has (final / beta / alpha)
  • Depending on the status a buggy firmware can harm your hardware too

Having said this: If you want to take this risk, feel free to go to the Fujistas

http://fujistas.com/foro/x-t1/ya-disponible-firmware-4-0!!!!/

 

Sorry to be a spoil-sport - but your security is important to us...

 

Andreas

Edited by FX Admin
Download from software with unknown status
Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be the best to wait for more testers, the official release is very near. I will see what Patrick will find out, before I try this. But I think that when the official fw comes it can be installed - the fw from this link looks exact like the last official one, and is also named FWUP0005.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if this firmware is a beta, when the official firwmare done, can we upgrade it over the beta ? or not ?

Good question - I don't know.

 

I had to delete this link - for this and several other reasons:

  • We don't know this software - can be a virus too
  • If it's Fuji firmware, we don't know what status it has (final / beta / alpha)
  • Depending on the status a buggy firmware can harm your hardware too

Having said this: If you want to take this risk, feel free to go to the Fujistas

http://fujistas.com/foro/x-t1/ya-disponible-firmware-4-0!!!!/

 

Sorry to be a spoil-sport - but your security is important to us...

 

Andreas

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question - I don't know.

 

I had to delete this link - for this and several other reasons:

  • We don't know this software - can be a virus too
  • If it's Fuji firmware, we don't know what status it has (final / beta / alpha)
  • Depending on the status a buggy firmware can harm your hardware too

Having said this: If you want to take this risk, feel free to go to the Fujistas

http://fujistas.com/foro/x-t1/ya-disponible-firmware-4-0!!!!/

 

Sorry to be a spoil-sport - but your security is important to us...

 

Andreas

Actually I downloaded it from Fujistas also, if anybody doubted, I've just pasted the link I found there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...