Sakini

Well, it´s just right for me, the ergonomics being in first place because of my use of large and heavy lenses, and to have a stabilized 16-55 for very dark indoors (where tripods and flashes are forbidden) will be a great thing, so I already preordered. Czech users who already tested the X-H1 extensively say that the battery life is very similar to the X-T2, also with use of the IBIS. Also the viewfinder looks very similar. It´s definitely a great step forwards to a really complete digital camera ecosystem, I only hope that the X-T line stays by it´s smaller form factor and the X-T3 doesn´t get this large grip, a more compact but powerful flagship is needed too.

16-55/2.8 and 50-140/2.8, as they are the most universal pair for a wide variety of actions. Heavy, but not too much when I see the results.

Not easy for Fuji - what to do with all those hasty people? They have done it to themselves willingly, but in the end those are the real Fuji fans and loyal costumers. And it would not look good when there is a flaw in the leaked firmware, and X-T1´s begin to "explode", other people who are not well informed about Fuji could through the complicated ways of internet recieve only the message "Fuji makes bad cameras and suicidal firmwares". They will surely do something about it, when there is real need, it´s about their public image, but they should work on their security measures. This leak was really not needed just a week ahead of the official release.

There must be a possibility for Beta testers to change later to the final 4.0 - either this, or this is simply the final version.

I will, when I find the courage to install it :-)

It would be the best to wait for more testers, the official release is very near. I will see what Patrick will find out, before I try this. But I think that when the official fw comes it can be installed - the fw from this link looks exact like the last official one, and is also named FWUP0005.

I would not trade it - the APD version has a creamier bokeh, but not always and when the situation is not ideal the bokeh can be very nervous and ugly. The "normal one" is more stable in this, I had the same chance but stayed with the classic version.

The AF has to be something much better - more powerful than the X-T1, something like 96% PD coverage on the sensor with -1 EV sensitivity, and advanced CD autofocus with -4 EV sensitivity (and faster than the actual one). Also the battery should be better, with larger capacity. A touch LCD screen would be also nice. Of course this technology would then find it´s way to the X-T2 and X-E3 - I think the X-E3 is waiting for a new sensor and processor, that´s why there´s still no sign of it for now.