Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I've been using my XT-1 and only recently i noticed that there are a few white pixels appearing on images. I tried blowing on the sensor with a tool and took a picture with the lens cap closed, but I still see these pixels. 

 

Not too familiar with sensor issues, but since they appear even with no light (cap closed), are they "bad pixels"? I didn't think this would be something that's common. Any suggestions? :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a crop of the area where this happens

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

as usual the first and foremost place to get in touch with is the shop where you bought it.

 

In lieu of this the warranty applies in any country at the distributor, this is true even if you bought somewhere else.

 

Everything sold in the EU carries a statutory minimum guarantee of 14 months.

 

You might have not noticed this before but it was probably there from the start. Most people never notice this because they never test it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No in case on B&H they don’t have a guarantee to honor. Get in touch with Fuji in your country.

 

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/find/HelpCenter/WarrantiesRepair.jsp

 

Just in case they might say they are not responsible.......they are, for a minimum of 1 year

 

Should they be resistant and uncooperative get in tough with Tokio head office.

 

http://warranty.fujifilm-digital.com/contact

Link to post
Share on other sites

They called hot pixels, occurring during long exposures or high iso values. Those pixels are more sensitive by light than the others. I had this problem on my X-T1 within two months after purchasing. Went back to the store and they send the camera to Fuji service where they remapped the sensor and I have no problem up to now! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice to hear that Fuji came up trumps 

 

B&H doesn’t......

All items sold by B&H are warranted solely by the manufacturer/distributor, except "direct import" a/k/a IMP items. All items needing repair (other than IMP) should be sent to the manufacturer/distributor directly for service. B&H is not liable if the manufacturer/distributor fails to perform warranty service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
This effect is a very common one and is caused by dead or damaged pixels.

Pixels may be "stuck on" and a single pixel producing a bright one colour dot or a small group of pixels

 

In images they are often termed "hot pixels. Most sensors have some. They are a common consequence of aging. Some sensors will have them from new, some won't.

 

LCD screens also have them. Software is available to map them and to adjust the image to greatly remove their effect. As a simplistic example, if you had a single "hot pixel" if you averaged the light values in the adjacent pixels and replaced the "stuck" value wit the average value it would be exceeding unlikely to be noticed in the very large majority of images. The algorithms used for correcting them are liable to be more complex than this but this explains the concept well enough.

 

Some cameras have a hot pixel correction function - a long exposure shot is made in 'total darkness' (eg - with lens cap on) and the camera then adjusts for anything it finds in the dark frame.

 

Hot pixels will usually be most obvious in areas where they stand out against the background, and in longer exposure images.

 

"Stuck" pixels are most obvious if they are stuck on - but pixels that are always off will also be encountered. Here's an image showing an always off greem pixel.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Same here with my one year old X-T1. All images from the last two days show one white pixel (reproducable with lens cap on, normal exposure 1/30, ISO 200). Unfortunately I bought it used and while have the original receipt from Amazon.de, I'm not sure, Fujifilm support will handle it as waranty case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny this came up recently. I just noticed the same thing with my X-T1. Between that and the warped accessory port door, I'm finally sending it in for warranty work. The camera wasn't abused but it is scuffed a bit and some of the rubber grip is loosening a bit - I hope they don't try and say it's not covered under warranty anymore. Fingers crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny this came up recently. I just noticed the same thing with my X-T1. Between that and the warped accessory port door, I'm finally sending it in for warranty work. The camera wasn't abused but it is scuffed a bit and some of the rubber grip is loosening a bit - I hope they don't try and say it's not covered under warranty anymore. Fingers crossed.

My accessory port door was warped too, it seems like bad design. They replaced it for me as a part of warranty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My accessory port door was warped too, it seems like bad design. They replaced it for me as a part of warranty.

 

 

Between that and the hot pixels, I finally sucked it up and shipped my camera out to them today. I was having trouble with their customer service for the last little while, and just realized they have a separate customer service department for the "pro" X series cameras. I found that out this morning and everything has been so much smoother - the replies were so much faster and the guy was helpful and straight forward. I got more accomplished in two or three emails this morning than I had in a dozen or so emails over the last couple months. 

 

I'm not sure if I listed too much, but I made note of the pixels, the warped door, and the rubber grip starting to come loose. I'm pretty sure I have an early copy of the camera, so I'm hoping they'll just replace it. We'll see how it goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Between that and the hot pixels, I finally sucked it up and shipped my camera out to them today. I was having trouble with their customer service for the last little while, and just realized they have a separate customer service department for the "pro" X series cameras. I found that out this morning and everything has been so much smoother - the replies were so much faster and the guy was helpful and straight forward. I got more accomplished in two or three emails this morning than I had in a dozen or so emails over the last couple months. 

 

I'm not sure if I listed too much, but I made note of the pixels, the warped door, and the rubber grip starting to come loose. I'm pretty sure I have an early copy of the camera, so I'm hoping they'll just replace it. We'll see how it goes.

Ah yea they treat the pro line differently. I need to contact them again for sensor issues and they're not responding via email! Could you direct message me the contact info you found for the pro center?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yea they treat the pro line differently. I need to contact them again for sensor issues and they're not responding via email! Could you direct message me the contact info you found for the pro center?

 

For sure, are you in Canada?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here with my one year old X-T1. All images from the last two days show one white pixel (reproducable with lens cap on, normal exposure 1/30, ISO 200). Unfortunately I bought it used and while have the original receipt from Amazon.de, I'm not sure, Fujifilm support will handle it as waranty case.

The Problem has been solved by Fujifilm Germany on waranty. It took two weeks including shipment, about five working days for testing and repair, including firmware update to 4.10. So for me everything worked very well, no problem buying an X-Pro 2 or X-T2 next year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm happy to report good news, too.

 

I got my camera back today. I shipped it out Friday Oct 31 and it arrived at the repair centre Monday Nov 2, so it was pretty much exactly one week's time. Something I found interesting is that Fuji's arranged pickup was through Purolator, but they shipped it back to me via Canada Post. 

 

So far it seems like this was a great experience. They didn't explicitly mention the hot pixels or sensors in the repair log, but they had listed it in the description of the camera upon arrival, so I'm guessing that means they addressed it. They gave it a "Pro Service Level 2" (whatever that is :lol:), replaced the accessory port door, and to my surprise, replaced all the grip. :) If it weren't for a couple scuffs on the metal, I would have thought they'd given me an entirely new camera. I didn't realize how faded the rubber had gotten on mine. :lol:

 

I was nervous, but I shot a couple frames with the lens cap on and couldn't find any hot pixels. The accessory port door doesn't seem any different, but it's flat and sits flush, so hopefully it doesn't warp on me again. It feels great to have a camera again. That was a long week. :lol:

 

edit: Forgot to mention Canon. I sent my 70D out twice for autofocus issues (I couldn't get the micro adjustment to calibrate properly), had to wait two weeks each time, only have Canon send the camera back to me stating that it appeared to be in working order. That's mainly why I was so nervous about sending this one off to Fuji, but thankfully it was an entirely different experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...