davidmold

I found a way to fix the issue: rotate the button back into position (turn it clockwise) using an X-acto knife. Then place a small square of duct tape over the button to hold it in place. The square must be large enough to stick to the button and some of the metal around it. You can still use the button through the tape, and the tape prevents it rotating back into the bad position.
 
My X-T10 is out of warranty, and the thumb rest has fallen off, along with the rubber grip material on half of the camera, and this button failure. I haven't abused this camera - they are simply not built to a very high standard, I'm afraid. It still takes wonderful pictures, but I can't say I would recommend anyone buy one of these.

If only this lens were able to cook me breakfast in the morning, I might think about buying it one day.

I'd like to ask that people not flood the group with pleas for us not to do things they don't like.
 
Doh! I just did it myself!

There you go. It's the fear of judgment like that. That's why they don't do it.

Hello Sophie
 
This is just one forum of many, covering just one, tiny aspect of the truly vast subject of street photography.
 
Have you looked at the other forums here, such as architecture, people at windows, kids & teenagers, street markets, loneliness / solitude, and shop windows?
 
Even with those other categories you are seeing just a tiny selection of street photography. 
 
Forums, by their nature, tend to "categorise" different subjects, and it's very easy to judge an overall subject by seeing just one, tiny part of it.
 
The "gimmicks" you refer to are real occurrences, they were not posed.
 
If you look at any of the books of photographs by Robert Doisneau, Elliott Erwitt, Gianni Berengo-Gardin, and many, many others, you will see that they were photographing those "gimmicks" 50 or 60 years ago, and those gentlemen were the pioneers of street photography.  Doisneau and Erwitt, in particular, show amazing senses of humour and irony in the work they produced from the 1950s onwards.
 
Street photography is not "heading" anywhere... it's still doing exactly what it did since Henri Cartier-Bresson started back in the 1930s, almost one hundred years ago, as you will easily see if you visit any exhibition of street photographs taken in any of the last 8 decades

The only firmware update that would genuinely improve the X-T10 would be one that turns the drive dial into an ISO dial, along with a sticker you could download or purchase to place over it, with the ISO properly marked. That one simple change would turn it from the "little brother of the X-T1" into the best camera ever made.

On this one:
 
In fact, if you switch the aperture to A, you can use the rear command dial (or front if you prefer) to adjust the aperture, so you can control it all from the camera body if you want, and use it one handed, as long as you have A selected on the shutter dial.

With Fuji you are in continual danger of taking a rather nice picture, whereas with other systems you spend so much time fiddling with your nice camera that the danger is averted.

Well then you should do it, it's a great lens.

I'd personally recommend to buy XF23mm for it's price. X100s is totlaly different camera to X-T10. Different controls position, hand grip, buttons customization, menu customization.
 
When I had X-E1 it was not dramatic difference with X100s, but still significant for me enough to decide return to single camera + few lens option.
 
One more point. With a habit of wearing 2+ lens, X100s made me to buy and try Wide/Tele convertors. Which is increasing budget, but can't compete ergonomically with X-T10 + corresponding lens.

I disagree with the premise that the XF23 is slow and produces only average results. Although the lens is large in comparison to some other Fuji lenses (though not when compared with most lenses of similar quality), I have found the autofocus to be nice and fast, and in my view the image quality from it is among the best of what the Fuji range can achieve. This view is also supported by the more technically oriented reviews. For example: http://admiringlight.com/blog/review-fujifilm-fujinon-xf-23mm-f1-4-r/3/
 
If you take a look at the Flickr pages for this lens, they contain some of the most beautiful images you'll see taken on any Fuji system, and while the X100T has advantages in terms of size and convenience, in my view the quality of its lens doesn't come close to the sheer beauty the XF23 has to offer. While the 27mm pancake lens is, well, a pancake, its performance is not poor *for a pancake lens*. The lens on the X100T is also a pancake lens, and so its performance is really very comparable with the 27mm, as has been demonstrated quite clearly by those who get excited about the numbers.

Yeah I know, it's too dark, any camera could of made it, it's basically a silhouette - I "need" to get it into a workflow, lift the shadows, dampen the highlights, clone out the toy, crop away the curtain - yada yada etcetera etcetera
 
But the thing with the X-Pro1, is it can make a SOOC jpeg that so captures what you saw, there suddenly isn't any reason to try and change life!!!
 
Agree/disagree hate it/love it
 
Eff it.
 
It's life, it's the intimate mood of family life and more and more I find the X-Pro1 is my go to camera for attempting to capture it
 
That OVF connects me to what I'm seeing.
 
Professionals and amateurs alike produce beautiful and wonderful portraits with X series cameras, and it's always worth pushing the envelope, but I personally love the fact that our cameras are just as happy to be picked up, set, and fired.
 
 
 
 
Trying Mummy's Breakfast by Adam, on Flickr
 
Thanks for looking.

For no other reason than “I want too & I LOVE it” I thought I’d review my (the) X-PRO1.
 
This review is merely the ramblings of an enthusiastic enthusiast, a mediocre amateur who’s entire skill (and I use the word in its loosest possible sense) set pretty much comprises thinking, ‘that looks nice, I think I’ll snap it’ a man who’s post posting technique pretty much stops at, “lets saturate the colours and make it darker”
 
Anyone subjected to hours of the kids show, Peppa Pig, should recognise the Mr Bull character and his catch phrase of “let’s dig up the road” well, that phrase could easily be applied to my desire to take pictures.
Now some of you may read this, and somehow get offended, how dare I say some of these things? Well try 1)reading to the end and 2)not skim reading.
 
Anyway…
 
Part One
 
So the X-PRO1, what’s all the fuss - mythology and downright untruths…
 
The X-PRO1 is so well built, easily the best in the Fuji range?
 
As the kidz say “lolwhut?”
 
The X-PRO1 is far bigger than it needs to be technically (don’t fret we’ll come to ergonomics later), it hasn’t got any extra stuff inside that the smaller X bodies don’t, and the net result is of a rather hollow feeling camera that belies its physical bulk. The dials have a pleasant tactile feeling, but wobble about a bit if pushed and the EV is so easy to rotate that checking it’s where you left it (it won’t be) quickly becomes second nature.
 
The Frame Lever sorry EVF/OVF switch is upside down IMO (well mine isn’t because I took it off and mounted it the correct way up!), it’s attachment feels flimsy and the whole mechanism for swapping between OVF & EVF feels like the camera is performing a great labour
 
The scroll wheel on the back feels especially flimsy, wobbling about with too much vertical play, but it does at least have the decency to double as a physical button (X-T1 why don’t you have this?)
 
The shutter button rattles about like a ball joint that passed its useful life several thousand miles ago.
 
The slow operational speed of the X-PRO1 makes me a better photographer. It gives me time to think
 
No. You give you time to think. BUT personally speaking the fact that the X-PRO1 is slow, means I have to work to its pace. This helps me; I suspect that you’re already capable of thinking photographically. Perhaps you’ve even learnt to plan your shots before bringing the camera to your eye or even before you’ve left the house that day!
 
The honest truth IMHO is that learning a slow and quirky camera makes you better at using a slow and quirky camera. If in the course of that learning curve you learn more about photography in general, then rejoice – but take the damn credit - YOU did that, not the camera.
 
The X-PRO1 files are almost film like in appearance
 
Are they F***. Film is film like. The X-PRO1 is just less digital looking than other more modern cameras (like any X-Trans II camera for example)
 
IMO, the X-PRO1 output is bit like CD vs MP3, sure CD sounds more analogue LIKE than MP3, but don’t be trying to tell me that CD is wild, raw and scratchy like a record (or indeed film) because it’s not.
 
OK so that’s my personal take on the myths and untruths, let’s move beyond this apparent unpleasantness and get straight too
 
Part Two
 
Emotive engagement - the importance of being Earnest
 
A crap job with a great wage is hard toil, a great job with a liveable wage is a joy to undertake
 
So, imHo the X-PRO1 is not the über build quality, files like film, free photography lesson with every click, that some would have you believe.
 
So what.
 
It’s without any shadow of doubt in my mind an absolute joy to shoot with. It’s truly greater than the sum of its component parts. Like a Morgan or Westfield sports cars or SS model Rolexes, less is definitely more.
 
In a disposable prosumer world where pretty much every camera is differentiated only by its manufacturer and lens mount, not its spec sheet, where every little black mag alloy box shares must have features that are ground into obsolescence by the next release, it is (in my opinion) an absolute bloody sheer magical delight to use a camera that’s kinda like a camera. No, I don’t mean shutter dials that miss off half speeds or fly-by-wire aperture rings or snail-by-wire focus rings – I mean a camera that doesn’t have Wi-Fi or GPS or have the need for the user to remember when to use or not to use an electronic shutter, the X-PRO1 is a camera that demands you to either 1)know 2)figure out 3)feel out with trial & error, the best settings.
 
Sure this process means more balls up shots, more missed shots, harder (MUCH harder) work with moving objects, but it also means a damn sight more reward when what comes out of the camera is pleasing, you can, with complete honesty say “I made that” and you can feel proud too, because with the X-PRO1 it might not of been easy
 
This brings me to engagement, for me I like LOVE that the X-PRO1 challenges me, it inspires me to try harder, then try harder still. OK, full disclosure… I also have a X-T1, because y’know, my 3 year moves around a lot, and it’s nice to be able to shoot wide open without needing an ND filter and its nice having so many controls at my fingertips.
 
But the X-T1 just makes me fire off more blanks than the Territorial Army, it’s a fast camera and it makes me feel the need for speed, it’s a hyper sports motorcycle, tearing up the highway, the X-PRO1 isn’t a bike… it’s a chopper baby, cruising the highway and taking in the sights and views
 
[i want to work the phrase ‘Zed’s Dead’ into that last paragraph but so far it’s alluding me]
 
Sure the X-PRO1 has a clearly digital output, but its files are its signature dish, run most cameras files through lightroom and they seem to turn out the same… again full disclosure, I don’t use LR, can’t get my head round it, but flick through Flickr’s explore and you’ll see many very samey shots, from many different cameras, nearly always processed with Adobe’s algorithm…
 
Well the X-PRO1 DOES have something with its files… I’m not exactly sure what….
 
(Reading DPR I think it may be the point at which the tone curve cuts to black, but I don’t understand all those graphs and shit like that. Sorry.)
 
…but there’s a grittiness to the X-PRO1, be it SOOC Jpeg or RAW that’s immeasurably pleasing. Words like ‘organic’ get used a lot… it’s as good as description as any… but for me, just unrelentingly pleasing, worthwhile, special
 
When I feel I’ve got a shot right with the X-PRO1, I’m pleased, I feel I’ve worked for it. The X-PRO1 as a body makes success harder to come by (than many more modern cameras), but because of this the delight when one manages to do so is tangible.
The ergonomics of the X-PRO1 are a little bit special too. I know some people love to hate the pseudo SLR styling of many mirrorless models, but let’s be honest here, Panasonic, Olympus, Sony et el all offer “range finder” shaped bodies… well they do if you define range finder as a rectangular camera without a central VF.
 
No the X-PRO1 is special as it’s just that bit bigger, that’s the plus point for that big hollow feeling that I pointed out earlier, you can actually hold the damn thing comfortably.
 
The other obvious thing that the X-PRO1 has is of course that OVF.
 
The inclusion of an OVF is simply to be applauded, no redaction, make that a standing ovation, a design triumph worthy of a ticker tape parade.
 
There are those that say, The X-PRO1 is a pseudo range finder, it’s not a true one. If you want a true digital RF, then the big L is the only game in town and let’s be honest, that’s a very true statement.
 
But it’s also a statement that is, in my view, an oxymoron. The X-PRO1 isn’t trying to be a Leica. Up until the release of the M240 the X-PRO1 was the only game in town that gave you the rangefinder shape, an optical VF AND the ability to use an EVF to check critical focus and framing.
 
And at time of writing (Aug 2015) the X-PRO1 is still the only camera that can offer this without taking your eye away from the view finder.
 
And let’s not forget the magic of having different strength magnifications of OVF to choose from!
 
The Leica cameras may indeed be the only digital range finder game in town, but the X-PRO1 is a whole new 21st century game.
 
The X100T shows how this game can go, and it can go in a very good direction.
 
[Full disclosure: I’ve nothing against Leica, or Leica shooters and I’d like to try one, one day…]
 
Part Three
 
Accessories – pimp my ride or must haves?
 
The X-PRO1 was as you’ll know, released with three prime lenses. Yup primes, the de rigueur 18-55 didn’t arrive until later.
 
I love the 3 original primes (& to a slightly lesser extent the XF27) they –too me- capture the essence of what the X-PRO1 is all about, a decent sized camera body, with small primes that are fast and sharp. I’m not completely daft, I realise the 16/23/56/90 are almost certainly better lenses, but they’re comparatively big, they’re comparatively expensive and –too me- they don’t fit with the original X-PRO1 design ethos.
 
[i might very well get the XF23 for my X-T1 though, and the 120 macro]
 
The X-PRO1 also has a leather case and the original hand grip.
 
IMO these products are both superb and perfectly fit with the X-PRO1. Namely each is pretty useless if you’re in a hurry, but if you’re prepared to take your time, and accept that they need removing to access anything and that removing them is s-l-o-w then the quality is excellent.
 
The grip may not have Arca Swiss dovetails and a hole for the batter/card door, the case doesn’t have that handy flap of the later X100 case, but… so what?!
 
The case is imo very well executed, the folding down front flap has so far managed to stay attached, even when left dangling for long periods of time (unlike my X100S case that I managed to lose the top part from)
 
The grip truly looks like it’s part of the camera, it simply improves the grip. Immensely.
 
The X-PRO1, the original primes, the original accessories even have a level of luxury packaging not found on the later bodies and lenses.
 
So, in summary, the accessories are must haves [especially the lenses ] they add to the camera, and they enrich the overall ownership experience.
 
I also tried an eye cup from another camera (didn’t like it) and I’ve fitted a soft release (love it) I also use 2 spare aftermarket batteries (no issues with them so far, after 15 months)
 
Conclusion
 
OMG dear reader, are you really still here? Oh no wait, now I get it, you skipped straight to this bit didn’t you?!!!
 
OK, so as I set out very clearly, just over 1900 words ago, I love this camera. I’ve even owned the damn thing twice.
 
Now for me, the X-PRO1 is famous for myths and untruths.
 
It’s not the last word in build quality. It’s the first of a line of steadily improving X bodies
 
Yes, yes, YES – I get it. The D Pad buttons are nicer to push than the blind key hole surgery that is the X-T1 D Pad. S-LO-W C-L-A-P. That doesn’t make for a superior build. You might prefer it (on th X-PRO1), sure why not, but IMO the X-T1 is a superiorly manufactured product in so many ways
 
The X-PRO1 is neither a Leica M clone nor a Leica wannabe. It’s a rangefinder concept camera born and dragged kicking and screaming with life into the twenty first century. People need to cut the umbilical cord on this Leica/Fuji shit. I suspect future iterations of the M will be more comparable to the X-PRO1 than vice versa…. Just a hunch.
 
The slowness of the X-PRO1 doesn’t make you a better photographer. You make you a better photographer, BUT the X-PRO1 is a fine tool to take with you on that journey.
 
The X-PRO1 files don’t look like film. The look like X-PRO1 files, not like Sony/Panasonic/Olympus files, not even like X-T1 files, they look like X-PRO1 files. Rejoice in them - for identity is important.
 
The Hybrid OVF is ingenious and very special.
 
OK… I think I’m done…..
 
If you care - all my X-PRO1 Flickr pics can be found here
 
https://flic.kr/s/aHsjUEpU8D
 
Regards
Adam
 

I did buy the 35mm f/2 lens.. what a fantastic piece of glass..! Just.. WoW..

Yeah exactly! It's both useless and confusing in different ways
 
For ISO the whole Q menu is overall a bad choice. It doesn't show you the "auto" parameters of auto-ISO when you switch so it's not helpful at all IMHO. Especially on the X-T10 the function button ISO menu is REALLY GOOD, letting you quickly scroll through the 3 auto-ISO slots and "see what's inside". Better than the other Fuji cameras and infinitely more useful than the Q menu version.

I disagree with the premise that the XF23 is slow and produces only average results. Although the lens is large in comparison to some other Fuji lenses (though not when compared with most lenses of similar quality), I have found the autofocus to be nice and fast, and in my view the image quality from it is among the best of what the Fuji range can achieve. This view is also supported by the more technically oriented reviews. For example: http://admiringlight.com/blog/review-fujifilm-fujinon-xf-23mm-f1-4-r/3/
 
If you take a look at the Flickr pages for this lens, they contain some of the most beautiful images you'll see taken on any Fuji system, and while the X100T has advantages in terms of size and convenience, in my view the quality of its lens doesn't come close to the sheer beauty the XF23 has to offer. While the 27mm pancake lens is, well, a pancake, its performance is not poor *for a pancake lens*. The lens on the X100T is also a pancake lens, and so its performance is really very comparable with the 27mm, as has been demonstrated quite clearly by those who get excited about the numbers.

Keep the 23 f/1.4, it's a significantly better lens optically, and arguably a more useful focal length if you only have one lens - classic reportage focal length which can shoot landscapes, street, docu and, with the quality of the 23 1.4 and the 1.4 even portraits nicely. Also has the MF clutch.
 
Ideally, though, keep it and save for the 35.

X-T1, X-T2, X-Twhatever, I don't care ... as long as Fuji gives us good glass.

Jeremy's right. At first I thought these custom settings would be very useful, but as I mostly shoot raw, they are not helpful at all. Also, it gets very confusing since when you switch to one, you can't then switch back to how you had it set up before, you can only switch between custom settings, which I found especially problematic with the values I had set for Auto ISO.