Which film camera does the X100/S/T most resemble?

[osullic]

Just for fun...

Which film camera do you think the X100/S/T most resembles?

Post a picture or link to a picture if you can.

 

Here's what DPReview seems to think:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilmx100/images/rangefinders.jpg

Canon Canonet QL19 and Olympus 35 RC

 

[Dis]

I'd say it's Leica M3

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/gadgetlab/2011/03/5494289480_c6136fefc1_b.jpeg

[ppacks]

size wise to me it's Leica CL and Minolta CLE from the 80's

[James163]

Feature for feature, the Konica Hexar.  35mm/2.0, autowind, almost silent leaf shutter.... right down to the easily bumped on/off switch.    The X-100 is one up on the Hexar with the built-in flash but down on the lack of built-in lens hood.

[macabee]

Reminds me of the Leica M2 I once had, most probably the reason I like the X100s

[ramosa]

Another vote for the Leica CL.

[milandro]

The Leica CL? ( I owned it) was a smaller camera than the X100 series with interchangeable lenses (40mm and 90), no autofocus, no automatic exposure.

 

 

Dimensions 121 mm × 76 mm × 32 mm (4.8 in × 3.0 in × 1.3 in) Weight 365 g (12.9 oz)

 

 

 

The Konica Hexar ( I owned this too) : Fixed 35mm f2 lens, autofocus, many types of automatic exposure virtually identical ( including the built in grip!) to the X100 series with the exception of one being digital and the other using film

 

 

Dimensions 137.5mm x 76.5mm x 64.5mm; 490g without batteries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The X100

 

 

Dimensions 126.5 (W) × 74.4 (H) × 53.9 (D) mm Weight 445 g (0.981 lb) (including battery and memory card)