Jump to content

Fujifilm will launch the first X series camera with 1” sensor in about 3 months (Anonymous Source)


Recommended Posts

so you are talking about a X camera with a 1” sensor?

 

12,80mm x 9,60mm ( approximately half the size of the X trans which is 23.6 x 15.6mm)

 

​I don’t understand the advantage of this other than it would be a camera for a completely different client than the Fujifilm X system has at the moment.

 

 

To me, if anything, the Fuji X system involvement is showing that the brand is moving away from that kind of market segment completely!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this were an X-30 type camera as opposed to an X-S1 type camera I would be interested. I have the RX100 (original version) and am looking to replace it. Right now, replacing the RX100 with any of Fuji's fixed zoom compacts would be backward step for me, but if Fuji came out with a serious RX100 competitor I would definitely be looking at it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an early rumour of course.  But only a few months ago the Fuji suits were spinning a move away from no profit compacts to focus on the bigger dollar end.

 

Full frame please. Two, right away.  Might even get an end of line Sony A7 to see how it goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this were an X-30 type camera as opposed to an X-S1 type camera I would be interested. I have the RX100 (original version) and am looking to replace it. Right now, replacing the RX100 with any of Fuji's fixed zoom compacts would be backward step for me, but if Fuji came out with a serious RX100 competitor I would definitely be looking at it.

Agreed. I'd love to see an X30 variant, even with a fixed or reduced focal range to help keep size down.

 

It's funny seeing some people complain about Fuji not catering enough to the high end market. Then they release fast WR primes and pro zooms, and people complain about the price and/or size. Same with complaints about lenses being too big, and complaints about the APS-C sensor. Looks like they're damned if they do, damned if they don't. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an early rumour of course.  But only a few months ago the Fuji suits were spinning a move away from no profit compacts to focus on the bigger dollar end.

 

Full frame please. Two, right away.  Might even get an end of line Sony A7 to see how it goes.

 

The current RX100 goes for $850. I suspect Sony are making plenty of profit on these type of high end compacts as could Fuji.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the XS1 & X A1 and would buy an updated XS2 with faster auto-focus = imho the XS1 is a great all in one camera for travel in Africa ( & other spots )  and without a long lens the system cameras do not replace it = would love to take pictures of birds in flight = when I tried the HS50EXR the birds were no closer when you compared the photos with those of the XS1

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is indeed a place in the market for WR camera with a fixed zoom for all those who have limited specific requirements covered by an all purpose zoom lens. People that are going to go through dusty places on earth while on holiday, but this will be falling into the most dangerous category of a camera made for a niche market which can so easily fall flat on its face loosing lots of money while Fuji is doing so well doing what they are doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are so right about how dusty a camera gets after a day on dirt roads, but it can be addition to rather than instead of system cameras - let fuji judge what they can turn a coin on - they are well into other niche markets and a better super-zoom than the XS1 would blow a lot of DSLRs out - I used a 500 sigma with nikon body from Pangolin Photo Safari in Botswana and I just could not carry that gear around the world - and few safari companies are out there that lend you gear! I really like my 50mm lens & X-A1 but they are for a different job!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the concept of the weather resistant FinePix S1. A nice tool for the dirty jobs. Never understood the X-S1. But a weather resistant X-S2 with 1" X-Trans sensor could be desirable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If one considers the x series as a quality mark rather than a particular mount or sensor, examine the marque and a long lens is missing, simplistically putting the XT10 behind a XC 50 - 230 or XF zoom with a 1in sensor you then get equiv. +/- 600mm to replace the XS1, just means carrying 2 cameras, 1 long zoom & 1 short zoom which is now a viable option, rather than 1 and a bag full of lenses, and how many photographers go out with 2 now anyway = just a thought!

Link to post
Share on other sites

short of having a crystal ball, as for the majority of the all too popular guesses and “ rumors” which started this forum after all, we will only know it when we get there.

 

I’ve never been a part of a community more prone to discuss things that aren’t there and that, in some case, will never be there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

short of having a crystal ball, as for the majority of the all too popular guesses and “ rumors” which started this forum after all, we will only know it when we get there.

 

I’ve never been a part of a community more prone to discuss things that aren’t there and that, in some case, will never be there.

So, to ask the obvious question, why are you here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So could I suggest that you do as I do and simply ignore the stuff you don't like? Whether you like it our not lots of people do like speculating and dreaming about camera gear still to come. As you noted, this forum has its origins in a camera rumour site so out should come as no surprise that it is even more common here. If you're not interested,or you think it's pointless, why not just ignore it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not arguing - I too am simply making a reflection.

 

To quote myself - "could I suggest" and "why not just". There's a difference between 'telling' and 'suggesting'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Evening,

 

Sensors are always an interesting subject,

the 1 in is twice the area of the XS1 2/3 & about  1/3 of the size of the APS-C

 

3 yrs younger than the XS1 performance / area would be expected to be better

 

and then you have to think of the size of lens that you have to front the camera with to gain the 600 odd equivalent mm 

Its not going to be small !

 

The XS1 comes in at about a kg

 

most interesting

 

and IQ for me is not the problem - I often print to A3 but no bigger and they are not for looking at with a looking glass but to be slapped on the wall behind glass

the faster auto focus - better manual focus - higher low light sensitivity - they would be higher on the agenda

 

quite prepared then to carry two cameras - never fancy to swop  lens in the field - if the wide angle is not sufficient

too much can go wrong!

 

it may be a stop gap until Fuji Perfect the long lens for the XT Series

 

each to their own

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem weird from Fuji to be working on an 1" sensor camera body, specially considering that they finally made some net income last year, 2015 prevision seems rather good also.

 

Logical thinking would be to first stabilize the income and then tackle new products, specially since the 1" marke is rather filled with bridge camera where Nikon is nailing it with the P900 and the Nikon 1 being quite a decent competitor in that sensor size area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...