Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi guys 

i have got X-T10 with XF18-55mm f2.8/4

the problem i have is that when i put the Aperture on manual mode and the zoom at 18mm f2.8 and go to 55mm the aperture stays stuck at F2.8 .... in other words it acts just like pro 16-55 f2.8 lol 

Notice : my body and lens are updated.

Edited by Kader2727mosta
Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it looks like the lens isn't communicating properly with the camera. With luck it might just be a tiny bit of dirt/fluff/oil etc on the contacts. Have you tried removing the lens and very gently cleaning the contacts on both lens and camera with a soft cloth?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dfaye said:

So, it looks like the lens isn't communicating properly with the camera. With luck it might just be a tiny bit of dirt/fluff/oil etc on the contacts. Have you tried removing the lens and very gently cleaning the contacts on both lens and camera with a soft cloth?

Yeah i've cleaned it and updated it also but still same , on Automatic mode it works properly but when i switch to manuel it works as 16-55 f2.8

Edited by Kader2727mosta
Link to post
Share on other sites

As lens&body have the newest firmware installed, I think the rotary encoder telling your lens at what focal lenght it is, is either broken or unattached to the mainboard, hence not communicating. If you stop the aperture down yourself to f/8 or something, while at 55 mm, this will probably show as 18 mm f/8.

Anyway, your lens needs to be serviced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, quincy said:

As lens&body have the newest firmware installed, I think the rotary encoder telling your lens at what focal lenght it is, is either broken or unattached to the mainboard, hence not communicating. If you stop the aperture down yourself to f/8 or something, while at 55 mm, this will probably show as 18 mm f/8.

Anyway, your lens needs to be serviced.

Yeah that's true , thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...