Jump to content

XF18-55mm f2.8/4 Aperture problems


Kader2727mosta

Recommended Posts

Hi guys 

i have got X-T10 with XF18-55mm f2.8/4

the problem i have is that when i put the Aperture on manual mode and the zoom at 18mm f2.8 and go to 55mm the aperture stays stuck at F2.8 .... in other words it acts just like pro 16-55 f2.8 lol 

Notice : my body and lens are updated.

Edited by Kader2727mosta
Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it looks like the lens isn't communicating properly with the camera. With luck it might just be a tiny bit of dirt/fluff/oil etc on the contacts. Have you tried removing the lens and very gently cleaning the contacts on both lens and camera with a soft cloth?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dfaye said:

So, it looks like the lens isn't communicating properly with the camera. With luck it might just be a tiny bit of dirt/fluff/oil etc on the contacts. Have you tried removing the lens and very gently cleaning the contacts on both lens and camera with a soft cloth?

Yeah i've cleaned it and updated it also but still same , on Automatic mode it works properly but when i switch to manuel it works as 16-55 f2.8

Edited by Kader2727mosta
Link to post
Share on other sites

As lens&body have the newest firmware installed, I think the rotary encoder telling your lens at what focal lenght it is, is either broken or unattached to the mainboard, hence not communicating. If you stop the aperture down yourself to f/8 or something, while at 55 mm, this will probably show as 18 mm f/8.

Anyway, your lens needs to be serviced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, quincy said:

As lens&body have the newest firmware installed, I think the rotary encoder telling your lens at what focal lenght it is, is either broken or unattached to the mainboard, hence not communicating. If you stop the aperture down yourself to f/8 or something, while at 55 mm, this will probably show as 18 mm f/8.

Anyway, your lens needs to be serviced.

Yeah that's true , thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...