Jump to content

Travel lenses

Jonny Cigar

By Jonny Cigar
in Fuji X Lenses

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jonny Cigar Newbie

Jonny Cigar

Posted
Posted

Let's just say that I want to travel light and with a max of two lenses. I currently own a 16mm f1.4 and a 35mm f.2 and would like to take street photographs, cultural events, portraits. I would like to experiment some astrophotography and landscapes.  

...but after trying the 16mm for a while I founded very wide and with lots of distortion due the wide angle. It's got some amazing reviews but maybe its just not the way I look at things. So I am tempted to sell the 16mm and get either a 23mm f.2 or 18-55 (apparently amazing kit lens) f2.8-4.

So my travel kit would be a 23mm and 35mm f2 or 18-55mm and 35mm.  what would be the best combo? Or should I just keep my 16mm? 

any suggestion would be appreciated 

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites
jwascher Apprentice

jwascher

Posted
Posted

I have both the 23 and 35 f/2 lens, and while I like them both, for travel, I don't think there is enough difference to make these your only 2 lens. For travel, I find my 18-135 to be the most flexible/useable lens for whatever situation you find yourself in. The 18-135 is weather sealed and IOS, adding to the versatility whenever you are out and about.

Link to post
Share on other sites
mdm Experienced

mdm

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, cug said:

If 16mm isn't your cup of tea, but primes are what you want to use, maybe selling both and getting 23/2 and 50/2 will get you what you want?

And add 27/2.8 in between. I think anyone who love 35mm FL as I do would love 27mm as well. Just give it a chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites
mma2 Rookie

mma2

Posted
Posted

My overseas travel set is the 18-55/f2.8-4 and 10-24/f4.  In the past, I have found that I took very few pictures at focal lengths greater than 70-85mm (full frame equivalent) so this set works nicely.  I could reduce the size and weight by substituting my 14/2.8 for the 10-24, but I prefer zooms when being a tourist at busy attractions.  Sometimes I cannot frame the image the way that I want by moving to a better location in crowded places.  For travel to places to view wildlife, I add the 55-200.

My wife and I love to travel and either walk a lot or take public transportation to experience the local flavor, so lightweight Fuji gear is wonderful.  While I have a full set of Fuji f2 primes, I prefer zooms when traveling.  To me, zooms are my friends in these situations for not only the above reason but also to minimize lens changing.  My experience is that I would miss opportunities and increase the possibility of sensor dust (which has happened to me during travel) with primes.  The quality of these 3 Fuji zooms is such that I don't worry about a smidgen more IQ that primes might give.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nero Rising Star

Nero

Posted
Posted

Too much noise is made about lenses that "do it all" at the expense of what you're comfortable with. When I'm traveling in new places with new scenery, I don't want to be adjusting to focal lengths that feel unnatural and new to me. That's a recipe for bad photographs, even if a new lens will technically allow you to do "more." I'm most comfortable with my 23mm and 35mm f/1.4 lenses, so that's what I bring when I travel. Depending on where I'm going I may bring my 55-200mm or my 56mm for the remaining 5% of shots depending on where I'm going, but my top 2 lenses are always what I'm most comfortable shooting with and I only adjust my kit if I feel that it merits bringing a third lens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
ggweci Newbie

ggweci

Posted
Posted

Not sure what your current ILC body is, but if you want to go really light and find that the 16mm is too wide, then how about picking up used X100 series camera for the trip?  It would suit your needs specified, including environmental portraiture (which you likely want in a vacation) and you could likely sell it for the same amount when you return if budget is an issue. 

Usability would be very similar to your current X series body, but I would still get it a few weeks before leaving to ensure you are fully up to speed with all the functions and setup. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • thelostkiwi
      Looking for Full Frame lenses to adapt to GFX

      By thelostkiwi · Posted

      I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Thank you. I will research it.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...