Jump to content

Fuji XT-1/ XT-10 Focusing Speed and Accuracy in Low Light Situation (Firmware 4)


Recommended Posts

What is very interesting in my experience is that when I upgraded, I had also reset my settings to factory as a precaution. I then shot with all of my lenses and thought: the focus doesn't seem much faster than the 3.x update. However, I was able to focus by candlelight, which was new. THEN, I realized that hadn't turned on High Performance because of the factory reset. THAT made a huge difference. My 35, 56, 55-200 and 18-55 acted like new and improved lenses.

 

So my takeaway is that the 4.0 update not only improved everything on high performance, but it also brought the "non-high performance" performance up too.

I thought the same thing.....the focus did not change much in single point AF, and I am still trying to understand those Zone focus as well as Tracking focus to get the most of it ( so I am practicing those two to see how they work best)

As far as the eye recognition, I would say that it is a 50/50 chance that the focus does actually find the eye :);) ( but I actually never use face recognition, so I don't care about the feature)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

 I tried using AF-C with the Electronic Shutter and it obviously failed. With the Mechanical Shutter it worked as well as I'd hoped, much better than before. 

 

I know it was a decision Fuji made, but I consider this more a bug. Clearly they had to have the camera "ignore" either the ES setting or the AF-C setting since they are mutually incompatible, but WHY would they ignore the AF-C?

 

It would be much better if AF-C, a PHYSICAL BUTTON were always honored than ES (and especially ES+MS omgwtfbbq). They could even make it an option (which to prioritize), but the current default just makes it feel like the camera is unable to track focus, not that a setting is stopping it from even trying. 

 

That said you clearly knew the rules, so it is indeed user error :P

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unlike much of the optimistic sounding reports I've read using various lenses, my experience with my 55-200mm is that AF speed in decent light is no better and it now refuses to focus reliably at all in very low light where firmware 3.10 used to work quite impressively.  This is checked with a specific high contrast target in my yard using consistent dim lighting and comparing it to my Olympus EM10.

My XT1 used to outperform the EM10 in low light by a couple EV or more with ease.  Now it's struggling and failing at light levels as the EM10 still works at.

When it tries to focus now, the EVF now dims considerably and it hunts, trying to AF.  I get AF confirmation now when the target is grossly OOF, repeated attempts just drive it more OOF altho, occasionally, it wil be close to focused, maybe 1 in 4 or 5 attempts.

 

When using firmware 3.10, anything I could clearly see in the EVF with a vertical contrast feature it would focus on no problem.  Now it even seems to have a harder time in decent light and lower contrast subjects than it used to.

 

I do like all the extra AF groups and control options provided but I'm disappointed with the reduction in low light AF performance on this lens that I make a lot of use of in dim conditions.

 

I wish I could reload V3.10, it worked better for me.

Maybe v4.10 will fix these issues.

 

I wonder if you're using a setting that silently disables PDAF, because that would explain a lot of what you're experiencing since the contrast AF never worked as well as PDAF and the new PDAF works in even lower light than the old one. 

 

Are you sure you are in MS-only (not MS+ES), that Face Detection is disabled etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

AF-C works perfectly with ES. 

 

Tracking in burst mode doesn't, but there is no "tracking in burst mode" button.

 

Not in CL and CH though right? When the drive dial is set to CH and the focus dial is set to AF-C (both physical dials) but the shutter is set to ES the outcome is that CH is honored but AF-C is ignored and focus is locked on the first shot. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not in CL and CH though right? When the drive dial is set to CH and the focus dial is set to AF-C (both physical dials) but the shutter is set to ES the outcome is that CH is honored but AF-C is ignored and focus is locked on the first shot. 

 

That's what I just said. No AF tracking in burst mode. The X-T10 clearly says this when the combo is set. The X-T1 doesn't. New UI vs. old UI.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

 

 

[...]I'm sure it's possible to work around the limitation of the current generation Fuji cameras - but couldn't the next generation already bring us to DSLR performance?

We are getting there but there is still quite a lot of work ahead before we get there.

 

I know that Nikon is in the making/testing a FF mirror less body, if everything goes fine, it might see light in Q1 2016.

 

Could be the next hit or could a dead end like the Nikon Df...

 

But mirror less camera haven't been around for a long time, decade maybe? And we already have very impressive things, Fuji for one, Sony for their A7 line, Olympus also. Quite a lot of improvements have been made and plenty are still to come.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have changed to full Fuji since the start of the year. Sure its not as fast as CaNikon, but it does the job well and I have no complaints about it. It does of course misses, but I learned to press and depress my shutter while I 3D track and Burst low at the same time to ensure my camera is still focusing on where I want it to be..

 

You just have to learn it's tricks..

 

I mean come'on, back in the days where CaNikon's AF was crappy (e.g nikon D200, or Canon 5D mk1), people still shot weddings with it and ended up well.

 

Im pretty sure Fuji's AF is better than a d200 or 5Dmk1...

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...