Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not fully getting most of your points.

 

If this is all horribly wrong - there is not a single camera on the market that fulfills your requirements - easy to claim anything similar from any other brand or model. I advice to build one of your own camera - it can't be that difficult to develop the perfect landscape camera with your knowledge...and please call it the AA-1.  (referring to Ansel Adams) ;-)

 

Neither Sony or Olympus can serve as a reference when it comes to easy operability & ergonomics. The word horrible is in this case for me never far away. Not that Fuji is that good but looking at FW4.0, they are slowly copying now what's already many years a standard in most expert/pro DSLRs. 

 

I'm the first to admit that I'll rather use my Nikon gear to do landscape photography, simply because the X-T1 misses a bit the resolution to do so - though the result can be surprisingly good if you don't care too much about the format. Portrait is a little bit a different sake. Since I've always been using rather short than long focal lengths to do this, even the 56mm is a bit long for me. Macro is a specialism. If you do so, buy a kind of bellow system, you won't hear me complaining with some kind of solution, if I'd ever need it. That's personal. 

 

What is really horrible, is that the support of the X-Trans conversions by mainstream software is still not at the level to expected. Give me from this 16MP only a bit more effective detail and less artifacts and I immediately forget anything else on the market. I'm really praying Adobe gets to it one day.

 

And yes, flashes are the point of Fuji, I still don't get it why there is nothing decent around in their own accessory line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Can neither agree nor disagree, more of a matter of personal preference to me

2. Maybe I misread, but you can lock the spot meter to the focus point in the menus (already mentioned too). I'd probably use focus lock or manual focus in those situations

3. I can't speak for Macro, it's just not part of my subject matter, but it makes sense why that would roll out later in the road map given the need to flood the market with lenses that will support 90% of shooters.  I do support a 70 or 75mm f2. 

4.  I use yongnuo 560iii's and their wireless triggers and ND's when needed.  Manual flash is just something I've been accustomed too since film.  I have not tested the Nissin i40 yet, which looks to be a good mix of compactness and TTL

5.  Carrying multiple power sources and chargers is just part of doing business for me. Between my Fuji and Sony kits I carry about 10 batteries. Limiting a battery to one form factor may cause future design issues, I can't agree with that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure this has been said already, but I'm in a rush and can't read all the posts.

 

Regarding metering, you can just set the spot meter to follow the focus point. Problem solved.

 

Between that, the meter indicator in the viewfinder, the pretty accurate EVF, and live histogram, I'd say if anything, Fuji is one of the best camera makers on the market for metering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I second the sentiment - Buy the camera that suits you better than FUJI if you think FUJI is doing things horribly wrong.

 

It's a FUJI forum consisting mostly of people that like FUJI - for the most part I would think - not that there isn't room for improvements.

 

Listing improvements that could be made would have been MUCH better approach.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

some good points  , but ive learned to live with em i cant help but adore fuji

 

x10 x20 x 30 x100 x100s xe1 xe2 ......no regrets

 

.....what i find unacceptable are pure product snafuslike the sloppy aperture ring on my 14mm.... its unacceptable

 

i use a rubber sleeve to shore u tension 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

why all the attacks on this guy .....he seems a personable fellow     not a spammer   and gave some food for thought ....even if it wasent your cuisine 

 

the tone and personal nature and accusations of incompetence against  his is just ugly

 

 

.......way to grow the forum................not 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see a lot of the improvements you pointed out but the biggest thing fuji is doing wrong to me is their dwindling production and support of their professional films.

The prices of 400H are ridiculous compared to the (mostly superior) Portra - but sometimes the look of the Fuji films is preferable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see a lot of the improvements you pointed out but the biggest thing fuji is doing wrong to me is their dwindling production and support of their professional films.

The prices of 400H are ridiculous compared to the (mostly superior) Portra - but sometimes the look of the Fuji films is preferable. 

 

The rising cost of film is a direct result of the dwindling market.  Fuji is actually considering discontinuing their slide film as I understand it.  For those of us that love to shoot film, this is a huge disappointment.  However the more they have to raise costs to keep producing it, the less folks are buying it.  If you want it on the market, then by all means, go shoot it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

If metering is your issue why rely on the small in camera sensor. Buy a dedicated spot meter like the sekonic L-758D. it has a 1 degree spot measurement, you can set up profiles for each camera you own and will work out averages for a scene. Expensive but worth it.

Unfortunately light meters don't work with Fujis as their ISO numbers are off by quite a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously Fuji, this is taking that whole "old school looks" thing too far. Pull yourselves together! :D :D :P:D :D

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...