Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That, given its shape, which is especially made and thought to make the camera be used without glasses, so that it would prevent parassite light from outside,  the long eyecup is best used without glasses using the outstanding dioptric correction built in the camera but, if you must, you could use it with spectacles too.

 

If, for some reason that I might not understand, the built in dioptric correction is NOT enough you can use it with glasses but its precise purpose, would be lost. In that case you can save the money, methinks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I shoot a fair amount on snow and glaciers where the extreme glare as an eyeglass wearer makes using the standard eyecup difficult . I find the long cup to be just enuf improvement to be well worthwhile and even a necessity. I wish a similar eyecup were available for the X-E's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Photography was the major factor that made me finally get over my dislike of things touching my eyeball and to try contacts. I am a much happier shooter now that I don't have to worry about the glasses getting in the way or cleaning them constantly.  ;)

 

That being said, save your money if you are wearing glasses. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I use it with and without glasses. When I'm serious shooting I wear contacts. The long eyecup for permanent glasses wearing is likely not the best result. Your eye will actually be further away from the evf and there is slightly more light coming in from the top and bottom. It will not isolate the entire frames of your glasses like you think it would.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...