Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi! I'm new here. I'm thinking of buying XT10 but I don't know what lens to buy. Money is a bit of an issue so I can only buy 1 lens (for now).

 

I was thinking of buying zoom lens first but I'm torn between the 18-55 and the 10-24. On one hand, the reviews on 10-24 are superb and the focal lengths it covers appeal to what I usually shoot but I'm worried that it will be unbalanced on the XT10. On the other hand, getting the 18-55 is definitely way cheaper and may be more versatile.

 

However, I am also having doubts with the zoom lens now since a lot of people are recommending the 35 and 23 to me. I usually get frustrated with primes and being restricted in one focal length. Yet, people are telling me that it will be worth it?

 

I'm a bit confused now on what to buy first. Advice please? Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to say the same thing.

 

I have a 18-55 and after owning the 10-24 for over a year I sold it in favor of a 12mm Samyang which is a great companion to the 18-55.

 

I would also recommend the 50-230mm because it is such a great lens for very little money. I own it and love it.

 

I also own the samyang 8mm f2.8  fisheye ( not strictly speaking a necessary lens but an incredible performer ) and the 60mm macro which you might use for a number of purposes but, again, won’t be, strictly speaking, necessary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to get the 18-55 for these reasons:

 

1. It's an excellent lens with very good IQ and size.

2. You can find excellent copies or even new ones for $250.

    (My local craigslist has been inundated with copies from a seminar where they gave away an XT10 with 18-55.)

3. It's the only way you can find out where your focal length sweet spot is.

 

After going through about a dozen lenses, I have the 18-55, 35 1.4, and Rokinon/Samyang 12 on my XPro1.

I had the 10-24 too, but sold it because it was too bulky for me.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitely recommend that 18-55, it's awesome.  Great build quality, great image quality, the IS is super useful, not just for images but also video (even if you don't intend to shoot video, you might have to every now and then).  It also gives you a range of useful focal lengths which you might want or need.  If you can't afford multiple lenses than get one that will be most useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tried to like the 18-55, but I failed. Nothing wrong with the optics, but it was too large for me on a X-E1, and too impractical on a X-Pro1. But it might be a great combination with the X-T1! And like I said, nothing wrong with the optical quality.

 

One of my favourite XF lenses is the 27mm. "Normal" FOV, small and light, and very sharp.

 

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand the reservations against the use of an all purpose zoom.

 

I too have never  been a zoom person and when I shot analog cameras I never had a zoom for any substantial length of time because I never really liked them.

 

However as I age, I don’t want to carry around as much as I used to, also because it is no longer my profession to do so.

 

I used to have two bodies + 15, 24, 35, 50, 85, 200mm ( and a 300 that I’ve hardly ever used).

 

Now I have one camera body and the panoply of lenses that I’ve described above ^ and maybe I’ll get a second camera body (but I am thinking about it long and hard about that) to avoid changing lenses all that often.

 

But I could go around with one lens alone and indeed I have done so with the 35mm f1.4 that I’ve sold when I bought the 18-55.

 

If I buy a new body it will be a X-E2 and it will be complemented by a 35mm f2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Good choice.

 

I would, if I were you, get the 18-55 first and then see if you really want the 35mm f2 after using the zoom at that focal length for a while. Then buy the 35mm f2 or even consider buying a 35mm f 1.4 ( with a more pronounced advantage in light efficiency terms over the zoom)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you normally prefer to shoot 10-24 then that is what you should get. A grip will help with balance if you decide you don't get on with the combination initially. Don't let anyone else dictate your preferred focal lengths, you'll only end up changing anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say it depends. I would buy f/1.4 35 or f/1.4 23 depending, is your goal set up 23 + 56 or 16 + 35 + 90 mm. X T10 is too good camera to use with zoom.

 

I had f/1.4 35 mm and f/2.4 60 mm  att first with my X Pro1. I still use 35 mm a lot, but I have 90 mm instead 60 mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you say that you are used to the 10-24mm focal length. GET IT! :)  many will say to get the 18-55 for the wide to zoom, I would agree. But get the one that you are most used to as it is you who will use the lens, not them. 

 

I know its unbalanced when you attach the zoom lens on the xt10, because its always on my camera than my 35mm and 56mm. I have no problems with it because its not much of a bother. I was thinking of the 23mm since I see that most of my shots are on the 24mm but I still prefer the versatility of the zoom specially when tight spaces are involved. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...