Kalle

I prefer usually a pair of 23 mm + 56 mm when traveling. I don't use flash and in my opinion zooms don't have the low light quality I want.

I have seen a test, where they tested a big brands f/1.4 50 mm made both in and out Japan (several different plant). In that case, made in Japan was much better.

I used to have 14 + 35 + 90 and changed to 23 + 56. Today 23 is the most used with X Pro2 and with X Pro1 27.

I prefer primes. Combinations 14 + 35 + 90 or 23 + 56 are the classic combinations.

No, because X T would be too heavy and too big to be a small camera. Extra grip is good for those, who need extra battery or use heavy tele without tripod.

In New Fujifilm X Magazine mr Ueno talks about f/2.0 300 mm, not 200 mm.

I wouldn't buy X Pro without OVF or with tilt screen. X Pro should be enough robust to use in any place.

I would say it depends. I would buy f/1.4 35 or f/1.4 23 depending, is your goal set up 23 + 56 or 16 + 35 + 90 mm. X T10 is too good camera to use with zoom. I had f/1.4 35 mm and f/2.4 60 mm att first with my X Pro1. I still use 35 mm a lot, but I have 90 mm instead 60 mm.

I'm waiting for X Pro2 (or what ever it will be named) as a second body. X100T would also be nice.

I would take 23 mm + 56 mm to trip. That is just enough to carry when you are cycling but covers well most of the situations. I would even think about X100T. One well known Finnish long distance cyclist used to have heavy DSLR, but he has changed to X100S in the latest trip. http://jukkasalminen.com/varusteet/ http://jukkasalminen.com Remember to take 2 extra batteries and some kind off small tripod. I have 3 extra batteries with me (X Pro1) and Sirui T-025. T-025 is too heavy for cyclist, but Sirui 3T series or Gorillapod would be perfect.