Jump to content

Problem Shooting X-TI with Studio Strobes


mtmt

Recommended Posts

I cannot use my X-T1's  on either the 'CL' or the 'CH' setting when using studio strobes.  I'm using a wireless remote tripper which works well when the 'Drive' dial is set to 'S' (single shot).  However, whenever I increase the frames per second option, the strobes will not fire.  As far as I can tell, all of my other settings are correct; camera is in full Manual mode, the Shutter Speed is set to 1/180.  Having to shoot fashion or anything with movement is painfully slow when you're restricted to the 'Single Shot' mode.  Any help with this problem would be greatly appreciated.  Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your very prompt reply.  I feel a little stupid.  I've been shooting 35mm motorized SLR's and switched to DSLRs and never ran into this problem in over 50 years.  I'm completely baffled by why my Fuji's can't fire the flash in a slow burst mode.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your very prompt reply.  I feel a little stupid.  I've been shooting 35mm motorized SLR's and switched to DSLRs and never ran into this problem in over 50 years.  I'm completely baffled by why my Fuji's can't fire the flash in a slow burst mode.

 

I can't either but I hope it get's fixed in a FW-update if possible... otherwise in the X-T2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's usually implemented in cameras with built-in flashes to prevent overheating and battery sag. Makes no sense whatsoever on a camera with a PC connection and no built in flash....classic firmware bug. Kind of adds insult to injury in a system that has such lousy native flash options. And slowish sync speed (excepting X100 series). And no wireless TTL. And no direct control of flash exposure comp on most (any? maybe X-T1 & 10?) models. And by direct I mean a dedicated button. Or at least the darn Q-menu!

 

(Sorry - I try not to be negative, but I'm going to assume that Fuji may actually pay some small attention to this forum. Consider it feedback from an actual user.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's usually implemented in cameras with built-in flashes to prevent overheating and battery sag. Makes no sense whatsoever on a camera with a PC connection and no built in flash....classic firmware bug. Kind of adds insult to injury in a system that has such lousy native flash options. And slowish sync speed (excepting X100 series). And no wireless TTL. And no direct control of flash exposure comp on most (any? maybe X-T1 & 10?) models. And by direct I mean a dedicated button. Or at least the darn Q-menu!

 

(Sorry - I try not to be negative, but I'm going to assume that Fuji may actually pay some small attention to this forum. Consider it feedback from an actual user.)

 

Have no doubts that Fuji feels not having a dedicated flash system is a huge problem.  One they are committed to fixing and are close to a solution.  We have no idea how far the Metz issue set them back.  The TTL solution is one of Fuji's top priorities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...