Jump to content

Seen any new and “ interesting " accessories for the Fuji system? (or general purpose ones)


Recommended Posts

 

This seems like an accident waiting to happen...

Link to post
Share on other sites

JJC are making these. I am using them in my bags, but not attached to the lid! They make changing a lens so much easier, especially if you have a spare compartment with one in. You can find them on ebay. In the UK they are about £17 for four.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
Speaking of JJC (and reviving this old thread), I recently bought their lens hood for the 16-50 OIS (I bought the lens second hand and it came with caps only). It's a really tight fit, the first time I put it on I thought I was going to crack it. Reversing it onto the lens is also hard to do. I either leave it attached on the lens or just leave it at home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Speaking of JJC (and reviving this old thread), I recently bought their lens hood for the 16-50 OIS (I bought the lens second hand and it came with caps only). It's a really tight fit, the first time I put it on I thought I was going to crack it. Reversing it onto the lens is also hard to do. I either leave it attached on the lens or just leave it at home.

I've had mixed success even with the Fuji OEM hoods. The one that is the tightest fit and feels like you explained is the one for the 50-140. Other hoods seem not tight enough.

Edited by iSilentP
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
On 3/16/2017 at 4:27 AM, milandro said:

this is a quite interesting accessory, which is actually, at least originally, not originally meant for photography ( I spoke of something similar a few posts before) but can be used quite well for quick photography when you need to quickly point your camera and hopefully shoot pictures and no bullets  ;)

 

Especially when used to quickly point a very long lens ( where people sometimes have to “ find” the subject) this will be very good.

 

reddotreflex.jpg

Olympus makes a camera-specific red-dot sight. It works on any camera with a flash shoe. In the past, I used the Olympus site with an X-T2 for birds-in-flight photography. I still have it but no longer use it since I bought my X-H1. 

A few other Olympus products can be recycled for use on the Fujifilm X series. For example, their twin flash bracket for macrophotography can be revamped to create macro flash system similar to the Canon MT-24 or MT-26 or Meike MT-24. Just mount a Godox wireless trigger on your flash shoe and install two Godox flash units on the Olympus bracket's macro arms. Manfrotto makes a less versatile bracket to use with a similar Godox flash setup. It all works because the Godox trigger and flashes are wireless. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

What an interesting thread! It’s been quiet for years, but let’s revive it. Here are some accessories I’d like to see and would almost certainly buy:

Lens caps that are easier to grip (my fingers tend to slip off of the Fuji ones, and I haven’t found a source of aftermarket caps for all the sizes 39 mm to 95 mm of my Fuji lenses).

Three mounts allowing the camera to sit on a horizontal surface, one each for shooting in landscape or portrait orientation or straight up, and each one allows the absolute minimum distance between camera body and horizontal surface.

A tiny handheld device you look through to see the field of view of each of your prime lenses, to speed making the best choice. Could go in the hot shoe or be handheld. Though, I’m calibrating a tailor’s cloth measuring tape to be held at arm’s length, which may work great.

A frosted pane to handhold in front of the lens, so you can turn and look toward the light source and use the camera as an incident light meter. It would of course be calibrated (some known number of stops to compensate it).

A blowing or sucking nozzle with a crossbar at the correct distance from the tip, for cleaning the glass sensor cover, so you can get it very very close to the sensor cover without ever touching (the crossbar touches the lens mount just before the tip would touch the sensor cover).

Two replacement viewfinder eyecups that are intended for users who always wear glasses, and who never wear glasses, instead of the compromise design. After all, does everybody go back and forth?

An optical quality clear glass "filter" that fits directly on the camera body rather than on the lens. It would protect the sensor for optics experiments, unusual lens configurations, use with bellows for macrophotography, and similar purposes.

Edited by Astigmatism
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...