Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

A few weeks ago I bought the Fuji 90mm but didn't get to use it due to a tight schedule this past month (actually, I only tried it out just once when at home). It has been sitting inside a camera bag all this time.

 

Yesterday when I took it out, I inspected it and saw this quite conspicuous speck WITHIN the lens itself (you can see it in the photo attached, slightly down left to the middle of the lens). I am quite sure it's dust.

 

Now I know that every lens accumulates dust no matter how well you take care of it, and it shouldn't really affect the images you take, but I guess I thought it would be different with this weather & dust resistant lens? especially when it is brand new, haven't been used and stored properly?

 

What do you guys think I should do? Continue as if nothing happened, or try and have it replaced?

 

Thanks :)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea I thought these WR lenses wouldn't gather dust. For image quality it doesn't matter. But if I were you I'd try to get it replaced just for the idea (especially if you bought it in a store where you can just drop by). If they don't replace it, continue as if nothing happened :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is one of the several other threads where people have signaled dust inside the lenses.

 

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/450-love-your-fujifilm-lenses-keep-away-from-dust/

 

 

I had bought a 10-24 a year ago and the first copy ad some dust of specs of something inside the lens as it came out the unopened box!

 

Yet, not being a weather resistant lens ( WR) and a zoom this could have happened when the lend was tested after been put together (although one would hope that this happens in a dust free environment!).

 

 

This is absolutely unacceptable in a WR lens. I would have it replaced. They replaced mine although I was well within the legal respite period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sluw & Milandro for replying.

 

The thing is, can't the guys at the manufacturer's authorized lab in my country tell me - "Hey, this lens has been with you for a few weeks now, we have no way to know how you handled it and it could be that this speck is your fault, we're not going to replace it" ? Just thinking about this before spending a few hours driving back and forth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, but this is a weather resistant lens and one of its most important selling points would be precisely to be impervious, throughout all its life not the first few days, to things like this. Whatever it might be that you did with it, unless you went through a sandstorm which would have left a lot more scars outside than a few specs of dust inside, should have been well within the criteria which make this lens a WR one!

 

You know, customers aren’t “ always right” but that doesn’t mean that they are always wrong by default.

 

You have a lens in your possession which should have never had this in the first place and there is one of two things at play.

 

1) the specs of dust were there before the lens was sold to you. Not your fault.

 

2) the specs of dust made it into a WR lens which is supposed to be impervious to water and dust. Not your fault.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, but this is a weather resistant lens and one of its most important selling points would be precisely to be impervious, throughout all its life not the first few days, to things like this. Whatever it might be that you did with it, unless you went through a sandstorm which would have left a lot more scars outside than a few specs of dust inside, should have been well within the criteria which make this lens a WR one!

 

You know, customers aren’t “ always right” but that doesn’t mean that they are always wrong by default.

 

You have a lens in your possession which should have never had this in the first place and there is one of two things at play.

 

1) the specs of dust were there before the lens was sold to you. Not your fault.

 

2) the specs of dust made it into a WR lens which is supposed to be impervious to water and dust. Not your fault.

 

Yeah, there's a lot to what you're saying. 

I just spoke with the main Fuji representatives in my country, and they said that I need to bring it in and they will CLEAN it. I said - Isn't it a pity to start opening a brand new lens and isn't it just worth to be fair about it and replace it? They said - That's something "the managers" will have to decide. 

 

So here's where I'm at - I could go there (it's a bit of a drive) and probably argue with them, most likely not getting what I want in the end(to replace it) and hence just wasting my time since I'm definitely not agreeing to them opening the lens. OR I could just forget about it, hoping that speck of dust won't cause any harm.

 

What do you think?

 

I did come up with the idea to just contact the main international offices of Fuji, though I can't really seem to find their email? They just want me to refer to the local representative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should definitely contact their main office and make your case, as it happened already before with another forum member from Bulgaria ( I don’t know your location) he was first refused the repair unless he paid, then after contacting the Fuji main office it was all cleared and the Bulgarian importer budged into “ we are going to repair your camera free of charge"

 

Here you can contact the head office in Tokio.

 

https://contact.fujifilm.com/cgi-bin/mail/form.cgi/contact_tokyo_headquarters?_ga=1.225719197.665361477.1432290617

 

Maybe I should apply for the job of Fujifilm Ombudsman? I am doing a lot of complaint administration for them on this forum already  :)  they seem to need someone in this capacity and I could use a new job!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Internal cleaning means: disassembling, cleaning, assembling AND adjustment (adjustment when applicable, we can't know it).

IF adjustment is needed by design, then we can get back the lens worse than before...

 

Exactly why I will never agree for them to try and clean it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed you should try to get it replaced. Cleaning is an option though. A while back I had some dust in my 18-55 (a non WR lens!) and I mailed them I didn't expect to gather much dust inside their premium line of lenses. They cleaned it free of charge. Great service!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I had the same with my 18mm, 27mm, 56mm, 10-24. When you are within guarantee. Fujifilm will clean it for free in most cases. Only when the guarantee has expired the change is big you have to pay for the cleaning. Best thing to do in these cases contact Fujifilm directly or the shop you bought the lens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

My 2/90 has two specks of dust, big specks [for dust] haven't noticed them in the images but it is a little bugging & on my mind if I ever sell it, not that I'd ever be doing that, probably, would be nice to have a clean one al the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...